Paper · 2000 · Pesticide Research Journal

Impact of different insecticides used for bollworm control on the population of jassid and whitefly in cotton.

M. Mohan; K. N. Katiyar

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The impact of insecticides used for controlling bollworms was evaluated on sucking pests such as jassid and whitefly. Imidacloprid was found to be the most effective insecticide in suppressing jassid population up to next spray, whereas, its continuous use invited more whitefly population. The population reduction of jassid was also better in monocrotophos and endosulfan treated plots. Neem treated plots recorded relatively less whitefly population, whereas, continuous use of cypermethrin induced 10-fold resurgence. Recommended schedule maintained both jassid and whitefly below economic threshold level.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid most effectively suppressed jassids until the next spray.

Treatment
Imidaclopride0
Interactor
jasside0pest
Outcome
jassid populatione0
Direction
suppressinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imidacloprid was found to be the most effective insecticide in suppressing jassid population up to next spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–227 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous imidacloprid use increased whitefly population.

Treatment
continuous usee0
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
whitefly populatione0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its continuous use invited more whitefly population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–289 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monocrotophos treated plots reduced jassid population.

Treatment
monocrotophose0
Interactor
jasside0pest
Outcome
population reduction of jasside0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The population reduction of jassid was also better in monocrotophos and endosulfan treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–387 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endosulfan treated plots reduced jassid population.

Treatment
endosulfane0
Interactor
jasside0pest
Outcome
population reduction of jasside0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The population reduction of jassid was also better in monocrotophos and endosulfan treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–387 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem treated plots had relatively less whitefly.

Treatment
Neeme0
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
whitefly populatione0
Direction
relatively lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neem treated plots recorded relatively less whitefly population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–452 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous cypermethrin use caused 10-fold whitefly resurgence.

Treatment
continuous use of cypermethrine0
Interactor
whiteflye1pest
Outcome
resurgencee0
Direction
resurgencee0
Value
10-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous use of cypermethrin induced 10-fold resurgence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–520 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–109 · show in text ↑
e1

“whitefly population, whereas, continuous use of cypermethrin induced 10-fold resurgence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–520 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended schedule held both pests below economic threshold.

Interactor
jasside0pest
Second interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
jassid and whiteflye0
Direction
below economic threshold levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Recommended schedule maintained both jassid and whitefly below economic threshold level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–109 · show in text ↑

endosulfan · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

monocrotophos · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

imidacloprid · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 27 positive, 5 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

botanical · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.