Abstract
Field experiments were conducted consecutively for 2 years at Coimbatore between 2002-03 and 2003-04 crop seasons during winter (August - February). Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) followed by summer (March - May), maize (Zea mays L.) crops using different thickness black polyethylene mulch film of 30, 50, 75 and 100 micron were evaluated against conventionally planted (no mulch) cotton - maize cropping system for moisture conservation and enhanced crop production efficiency. Higher uptake of nutrients due to higher temperature coupled with higher available soil moisture caused significant increase in root cation exchange capacity, nutrient uptake, dry matter accumulation and partitioning of assimilates under polyethylene mulching with an average yield enhancement of 1.83 to 1.90 fold in cotton and 1.95 to 2.10 fold in maize crops besides saving water. The water requirement of mulched cotton was 58.63 ha-cm whereas conventionally grown cotton was 84.19 ha-cm. The water use efficiency of mulched cotton was 43.2 kglha-cm as against 16.6 kglha-cm for conventionally planted no mulch cotton crop. The poly-mulched cotton-maize system recorded the highest net return (Rs 74,1781ha) and benefit cost ratio (1.68) as against the conventional system (Rs 29,863 and 1.04).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Mulching increased cotton yield 1.83 to 1.90 fold.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- polyethylene mulchinge0
- Outcome
- yield enhancemente0
- Direction
- enhancemente0
- Value
- 1.83 to 1.90 folde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“under polyethylene mulching with an average yield enhancement of 1.83 to 1.90 fold in cotton and 1.95 to 2.10 fold in maize crops”
Claim · model-written summary
Mulching increased maize yield 1.95 to 2.10 fold.
- Treatment
- polyethylene mulchinge0
- Outcome
- yield enhancemente0
- Direction
- enhancemente0
- Value
- 1.95 to 2.10 folde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“under polyethylene mulching with an average yield enhancement of 1.83 to 1.90 fold in cotton and 1.95 to 2.10 fold in maize crops”
Claim · model-written summary
Mulched cotton required 58.63 ha-cm water versus 84.19 ha-cm conventionally.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- mulchede0
- Outcome
- water requiremente0
- Value
- 58.63 ha-cme0
- Qualifier
- 84.19 ha-cme0
- Comparator
- conventionally grown cottone0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The water requirement of mulched cotton was 58.63 ha-cm whereas conventionally grown cotton was 84.19 ha-cm”
Claim · model-written summary
Mulched cotton had water use efficiency of 43.2 kglha-cm versus 16.6 kglha-cm without mulch.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- mulchede0
- Outcome
- water use efficiencye0
- Value
- 43.2 kglha-cme0
- Qualifier
- 16.6 kglha-cme0
- Comparator
- no mulch cotton crope0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The water use efficiency of mulched cotton was 43.2 kglha-cm as against 16.6 kglha-cm for conventionally planted no mulch cotton crop”
Claim · model-written summary
The mulched cotton-maize system had the highest net return.
Verbatim
e0“The poly-mulched cotton-maize system recorded the highest net return (Rs 74,1781ha) and benefit cost ratio (1.68) as against the conventional system (Rs 29,863 and 1.04)”
Claim · model-written summary
The mulched cotton-maize system had a benefit cost ratio of 1.68.
Verbatim
e0“The poly-mulched cotton-maize system recorded the highest net return (Rs 74,1781ha) and benefit cost ratio (1.68) as against the conventional system (Rs 29,863 and 1.04)”
The same questions in other papers
mulching · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- negative
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →mulching · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
360 papers more in this group
See all 364 papers →mulching · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
17 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.