Paper · 2008 · Xinjiang nongye kexue

Influence of White Pollution on Root Growth of Cotton

Wang Xiao-sheng

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was carried out for studying the influence of residual plastic film in soil on growth of cotton root and yield as well as on the soil physical property.Results showed that(1) soil water content and porosity reduced along with adding residual plastic film,but soil bulk density and particle density increased.(2) There was stimulation of residual plastic film on growing of the cotton root in 0-40 cm soil,root area(RA),root length density(RLD) and root dry weight(RDW) of cotton increased greatly when residual plastic film ration was less than 900 kg/hm2,but the root biomass was reduced because the root growth was inhibited by residual plastic film in 40-100 cm soil.(3) Dry matter weight of cotton plant and canopy/root ration reduced with adding residual plastic film which destroyed the harmonization of cotton root and shoot so that reduced the production of cotton.So stimulating root growth by a certain amount of residual plastic film could bring about adaptive response of cotton plant.but there was a negative influence of residual plastic film on biological yield and economic yield,and the greater the amount of residual plastic film was accumulated in field,the greater cotton plant was brought about its effect on reduction of output.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing residual plastic film reduced soil water content and porosity.

Treatment
adding residual plastic filme0
Outcome
soil water content and porositye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil water content and porosity reduced along with adding residual plastic film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–268 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing residual film increased soil bulk and particle density.

Treatment
residual plastic filmt1
Outcome
soil bulk density and particle densitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil bulk density and particle density increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–321 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
t1

“soil water content and porosity reduced along with adding residual plastic film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under 900 kg/hm2 film, cotton root area, length density and dry weight increased in 0-40 cm soil.

Treatment
residual plastic film ration was less than 900 kg/hm2e0
Outcome
root area(RA),root length density(RLD) and root dry weight(RDW)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root area(RA),root length density(RLD) and root dry weight(RDW) of cotton increased greatly when residual plastic film ration was less than 900 kg/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual film inhibited root growth at 40-100 cm and reduced root biomass.

Treatment
residual plastic filme0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
40-100 cm soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root biomass was reduced because the root growth was inhibited by residual plastic film in 40-100 cm soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton dry matter weight and canopy/root ratio declined with more film.

Treatment
adding residual plastic filme0
Outcome
Dry matter weight of cotton plant and canopy/root ratione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter weight of cotton plant and canopy/root ration reduced with adding residual plastic film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual film reduced cotton biological and economic yields, increasingly with accumulated film.

Treatment
residual plastic filme0
Outcome
biological yield and economic yielde0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a negative influence of residual plastic film on biological yield and economic yield,and the greater the amount of residual plastic film was accumulated in field,the greater cotton plant was brought about its effect on reduction of output”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1263 · show in text ↑

mulching · soil: physics · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

mulching · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 30 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

mulching · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 59 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.