Paper · 2018 · Polish Journal of Environmental Studies

Estimating Evapotranspiration and ItsComponents in Cotton Fields under DeficitIrrigation Conditions

Na Wu; Chuanjie Yang; Yi Luo; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Estimating field crop evapotranspiration (ET c ) along with its components of soil evaporation and crop transpiration is crucial for developing effective agricultural water-saving strategies. This study separately estimated ET c and its components in cotton fields using a SIMDualKc dual crop coefficient model. Data from a 2-year experiment (2010-2011) were used for model calibration and validation analysis. The experimental plots were irrigated at 1.00, 0.85, 0.70, 0.55, and 0.45 of full irrigation amount in north Xinjiang, China. Based on the results, SIMDualKc accurately estimated actual evapotranspiration (ET c adj ) and its components under deficit drip irrigation conditions. Cotton field transpiration accounted for 85.4-94.3% of the ET c in the study area. Although plastic film significantly limited evaporative water loss, the fraction of water loss was still 5.7-14.6% of irrigation water. The adopted estimation method could lead to better understanding of where and when water loss occurs and how much water should be used for maximal benefit. A better understanding of these factors is critical for sustainable agricultural water management practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SIMDualKc accurately estimated actual evapotranspiration and components under deficit drip irrigation.

Outcome
actual evapotranspiration (ET c adj ) and its componentse0
Qualifier
deficit drip irrigation conditionse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SIMDualKc accurately estimated actual evapotranspiration (ET c adj ) and its components under deficit drip irrigation conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton transpiration accounted for 85.4-94.3% of evapotranspiration.

Outcome
Cotton field transpiratione0
Value
85.4-94.3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton field transpiration accounted for 85.4-94.3% of the ET c in the study area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic film significantly limited evaporative water loss.

Treatment
plastic filme0
Outcome
evaporative water losse0
Direction
limitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plastic film significantly limited evaporative water loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water loss still represented 5.7-14.6% of irrigation water.

Outcome
fraction of water losse0
Value
5.7-14.6% of irrigation watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fraction of water loss was still 5.7-14.6% of irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–64 · show in text ↑

mulching · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.