Paper · 1973 · Agronomy Journal

Effect of a Killed Sod Mulch on Nitrate Movement and Corn Yield1

G. W. Thomas; R. L. Blevins; R. E. Phillips; et al.

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
98
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Corn ( Zea mays L.) was planted in a Maury silt loam soil under conventional tillage and in a chemically‐killed bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.) sod in 1970 and 1971 in order to determine the behavior of nitrate and the yield of corn under both cultural systems. Nitrate under both cultural treatments was sampled before and after June rainfall periods in both years. A large fraction of the nitrate was lost from the top 90 cm of soil under the killed‐sod plots, whereas, no nitrate was lost from the conventionally‐tilled plots. The loss of nitrate under the killed sod was attributed to two factors: 1) lower evaporation from the mulched soil; and 2) deep penetration of water and nitrate through larger pores in the wetter, mulched soil. Corn yields where nitrogen was applied tended to be higher on the killed‐sod plots in a dry year (1970) and about the same in a wet year (1971). However, the no nitrogen treatment on the mulched plots had a much lower yield than did the conventionally‐tilled no nitrogen treatment in the wet year of 1971. The results suggest that higher nitrogen rates may be required when corn is grown in a killed sod mulch as compared to conventionally‐tilled corn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate was lost from the top soil under killed sod.

Treatment
killed‐sod plotse0
Outcome
nitrate was lost from the top 90 cm of soile0
Direction
loste0
Comparator
conventionally‐tilled plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A large fraction of the nitrate was lost from the top 90 cm of soil under the killed‐sod plots, whereas, no nitrate was lost from the conventionally‐tilled plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–535 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn yields where nitrogen was applied tended to be higher on the killed‐sod plots in a dry year (1970)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–851 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No nitrate was lost under conventional tillage.

Outcome
nitrate was loste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no nitrate was lost from the conventionally‐tilled plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–535 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn yields where nitrogen was applied tended to be higher on the killed‐sod plots in a dry year (1970)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a dry year with nitrogen, killed sod tended to raise corn yield.

Treatment
killed‐sod plotse0
Outcome
Corn yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
dry year (1970)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yields where nitrogen was applied tended to be higher on the killed‐sod plots in a dry year (1970)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn yields where nitrogen was applied tended to be higher on the killed‐sod plots in a dry year (1970)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a wet year with nitrogen, corn yields were about the same across systems.

Outcome
Corn yieldse1
Direction
about the samee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“about the same in a wet year (1971)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn yields where nitrogen was applied tended to be higher on the killed‐sod plots in a dry year (1970)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without nitrogen in the wet year, mulched plots yielded much less.

Treatment
no nitrogen treatment on the mulched plotse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
much lowere0
Comparator
conventionally‐tilled no nitrogen treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the no nitrogen treatment on the mulched plots had a much lower yield than did the conventionally‐tilled no nitrogen treatment in the wet year of 1971”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn yields where nitrogen was applied tended to be higher on the killed‐sod plots in a dry year (1970)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–851 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest higher nitrogen rates may be needed with killed sod mulch.

Outcome
higher nitrogen rates may be requirede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher nitrogen rates may be required when corn is grown in a killed sod mulch as compared to conventionally‐tilled corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1199 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

364 papers: 330 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 330 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

360 papers more in this group

See all 364 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.