Paper · 2009 · DergiPark (Istanbul University)

Apple growing in greenhouse under subtropic conditions.

Burhanettin İmrak; Ali Küden; A. Sarieroğullarından

2
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Çukurova region and Mediterranean coastal line have early fruit growing possibilities, since these areas are earlier in terms of fruit harvest date than the other regions of Turkey as well as 10-15 days earlier than the European fruit growing countries such as Spain, İtaly, and France. Recently, growing summer apples getting more importance to the apple growers and consumers. Growers do not face problems in marketing apples in June, July and August when the apple supply is low. This study was carried out at the orchards of Pozmer (Pozantı Agricultural Research and Aplication Center) in Adana during 2008- 2009. Experiment was carried on 5 years old Mondial Gala, Anna, Golden Dorset and Vistabella apple cultivars on M9 rootstock which were grown both under greenhouse and open field condition. Greenhouse condition did not negatively affected the yield and quality of apple crop which were harvested 10-15 days earlier than the open field condition

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Adana, greenhouse condition did not negatively affect yield and quality of apple cultivars compared with open field condition.

Material
Mondial Gala, Anna, Golden Dorset and Vistabellae3
Treatment
Greenhouse conditione4
Outcome
yield and qualitye4
Direction
did not negatively affectede4
Comparator
open field conditione4
Setting
Adanae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple growing in greenhouse under subtropic conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–54 · show in text ↑
e2

“in Adana during 2008- 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–616 · show in text ↑
e3

“Experiment was carried on 5 years old Mondial Gala, Anna, Golden Dorset and Vistabella apple cultivars on M9 rootstock which were grown both under greenhouse and open field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–800 · show in text ↑
e4

“Greenhouse condition did not negatively affected the yield and quality of apple crop which were harvested 10-15 days earlier than the open field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apples under greenhouse condition were harvested 10-15 days earlier than under open field condition.

Treatment
Greenhouse conditione4
Outcome
harvestede4
Direction
earliere4
Value
10-15 dayse4
Comparator
open field conditione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple growing in greenhouse under subtropic conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–54 · show in text ↑
e4

“Greenhouse condition did not negatively affected the yield and quality of apple crop which were harvested 10-15 days earlier than the open field condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–956 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.