Paper · 1994 · California Agriculture

In Santa Cruz County, Granny Smith conversions to organic show early success

Sean L. Swezey; Jim Rider; Matthew R. Werner; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
27
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Conventional and organic semidwarf Granny Smith apple production systems were compared during 3 years of conversion to certified organic management on California's Central Coast. Yields were significantly higher in the organic production system in 1989 and 1991 due to significantly greater fruit load. Growth indicators such as tree girth, terminal growth, leaf area, and so on, did not generally differ, but tissue levels of nitrogen were generally higher in leaf and new wood bark tissue in the conventional system, while phosphorus levels were generally higher in tissue of the wganically managed trees. Key sconomic pest damage did not differ significantly in any year, although fruit and leaf damage due to some lepidopterous secondary uests was greater in some years in the conventional system. Apple kaf hoppers showed significant hcreases in leaf damage in the organic system. Price premiums for wganic apples consistently proiuced higher per-acre return for this system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple yields were significantly higher in the organic than in the conventional production system in 1989 and 1991.

Treatment
organic production systeme1
Outcome
Yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Conventionale0
Setting
California's Central Coaste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional and organic semidwarf Granny Smith apple production systems were compared during 3 years of conversion to certified organic management on California's Central Coast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yields were significantly higher in the organic production system in 1989 and 1991 due to significantly greater fruit load”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit load was significantly greater in the organic than in the conventional apple system, accounting for the higher yields in 1989 and 1991.

Treatment
organic production systeme1
Outcome
fruit loade1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
Conventionale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional and organic semidwarf Granny Smith apple production systems were compared during 3 years of conversion to certified organic management on California's Central Coast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yields were significantly higher in the organic production system in 1989 and 1991 due to significantly greater fruit load”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth indicators such as tree girth, terminal growth and leaf area did not generally differ between the organic and conventional apple systems.

Treatment
certified organic managemente0
Outcome
Growth indicatorse1
Direction
did not generally differe1
Comparator
Conventionale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional and organic semidwarf Granny Smith apple production systems were compared during 3 years of conversion to certified organic management on California's Central Coast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“Growth indicators such as tree girth, terminal growth, leaf area, and so on, did not generally differ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–404 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue nitrogen levels were generally higher in leaf and new wood bark tissue in the conventional system than in the organic system.

Organ / stage
leaf and new wood bark tissuee1
Treatment
conventional systeme1
Outcome
tissue levels of nitrogene1
Direction
highere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional and organic semidwarf Granny Smith apple production systems were compared during 3 years of conversion to certified organic management on California's Central Coast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“tissue levels of nitrogen were generally higher in leaf and new wood bark tissue in the conventional system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–517 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue phosphorus levels were generally higher in organically managed apple trees than in the conventional system.

Treatment
wganically managed treese1
Outcome
phosphorus levelse1
Direction
highere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional and organic semidwarf Granny Smith apple production systems were compared during 3 years of conversion to certified organic management on California's Central Coast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“phosphorus levels were generally higher in tissue of the wganically managed trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–606 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Damage by key economic pests did not differ significantly between the systems in any year.

Outcome
Key sconomic pest damagee1
Direction
did not differ significantlye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional and organic semidwarf Granny Smith apple production systems were compared during 3 years of conversion to certified organic management on California's Central Coast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“Key sconomic pest damage did not differ significantly in any year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–673 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit and leaf damage by some secondary lepidopterous pests was greater in some years in the conventional system.

Treatment
conventional systeme1
Interactor
lepidopterous secondary uestse1pest
Outcome
fruit and leaf damagee1
Direction
greatere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional and organic semidwarf Granny Smith apple production systems were compared during 3 years of conversion to certified organic management on California's Central Coast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit and leaf damage due to some lepidopterous secondary uests was greater in some years in the conventional system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–800 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple leaf hoppers caused significantly greater leaf damage in the organic system.

Treatment
organic systeme1
Interactor
Apple kaf hopperse1pest
Outcome
leaf damagee1
Direction
hcreasese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional and organic semidwarf Granny Smith apple production systems were compared during 3 years of conversion to certified organic management on California's Central Coast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“Apple kaf hoppers showed significant hcreases in leaf damage in the organic system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–884 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Price premiums for organic apples consistently produced a higher per-acre return for the organic system.

Treatment
Price premiumse1
Outcome
per-acre returne1
Direction
highere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional and organic semidwarf Granny Smith apple production systems were compared during 3 years of conversion to certified organic management on California's Central Coast”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“Price premiums for wganic apples consistently proiuced higher per-acre return for this system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–979 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.