Abstract
This paper presents the results of field experiments on the effect of foliar application of various IZAGRI fertilizers on yield formation and quality of two spring triticale varieties. The study was conducted in 2023-2024 on medium loamy gray forest soil in Kama region of the Republic of Tatarstan. Two spring triticale varieties, Timur and Orden, were used as subjects. Fertilizers from IZAGRI series were used for foliar application: IZAGRI Bor-Molybdenum (1 l/ha), IZAGRI Vita (1.0 l/ha), IZAGRI Potassium-Silicon (1.0 l/ha). Foliar feeding was carried in the earing phase, the consumption of working fluid was 200 l/ha. The maximum effect in increasing the leaf surface area was obtained with the use of IZAGRI Potassium-Silicon fertilizer (on Timur variety a growth was 21.2%, on Orden variety - 21.5%). The use of the studied fertilizers contributed to an increase in the ear realization coefficient (ESC), which indicates their anti-stress activity. On Timur variety the maximum values of the coefficient were in the variant with IZAGRI Potassium-Silicon and on Orden variety - with IZAGRI Bor-Molybdenum. The use of top dressing increased the yield of spring triticale (on Timur variety the yield increase from foliar feeding was at the level of 10.3-18.2%, and on Orden variety - 6.1-13.9%). On Timur variety the greatest increase in yield (by 0.65 t/ha) was ensured by the use of IZAGRI Potassium-Silicon fertilizer. On Orden variety approximately the same yield was ensured by the use of IZAGRI Vita (an increase of 0.54 t/ha) and IZAGRI Potassium-Silicon (0.52 t/ha). In Orden variety the protein content in the grain is significantly higher than in Timur one. The maximum protein yield from 1 ha was obtained when using IZAGRI Potassium-Silicon fertilizer, which allows us to recommend it for inclusion in Agrotechnology for spring triticale cultivation in Kama region of the Republic of Tatarstan.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium-Silicon increased Timur leaf surface area by 21.2%.
- Taxon
- SPRING TRITICALE
×Triticosecalet0 - Material
- Timur varietye0
- Treatment
- IZAGRI Potassium-Silicon fertilizere0
- Outcome
- leaf surface areae1
- Direction
- growthe0
- Value
- 21.2%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“IZAGRI Potassium-Silicon fertilizer (on Timur variety a growth was 21.2%, on Orden variety - 21.5%)”
e1“increasing the leaf surface area”
t0“SPRING TRITICALE”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium-Silicon increased Orden leaf surface area by 21.5%.
- Taxon
- SPRING TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Orden varietye0
- Treatment
- IZAGRI Potassium-Silicon fertilizere0
- Outcome
- leaf surface areae1
- Direction
- increasinge1
- Value
- 21.5%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“IZAGRI Potassium-Silicon fertilizer (on Timur variety a growth was 21.2%, on Orden variety - 21.5%)”
e1“increasing the leaf surface area”
t0“SPRING TRITICALE”
Claim · model-written summary
Studied fertilizers increased the ear realization coefficient.
- Taxon
- SPRING TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- studied fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- ear realization coefficient (ESC)e0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The use of the studied fertilizers contributed to an increase in the ear realization coefficient (ESC)”
t0“SPRING TRITICALE”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium-Silicon gave the maximum ear realization coefficient in Timur.
- Taxon
- SPRING TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Timur varietye0
- Treatment
- IZAGRI Potassium-Silicone0
- Outcome
- ear realization coefficient (ESC)e1
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On Timur variety the maximum values of the coefficient were in the variant with IZAGRI Potassium-Silicon”
e1“ear realization coefficient (ESC)”
t0“SPRING TRITICALE”
Claim · model-written summary
Bor-Molybdenum gave the maximum ear realization coefficient in Orden.
- Taxon
- SPRING TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Orden varietye0
- Treatment
- IZAGRI Bor-Molybdenume0
- Outcome
- ear realization coefficient (ESC)e2
- Direction
- maximume1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on Orden variety - with IZAGRI Bor-Molybdenum”
e1“the maximum values of the coefficient”
e2“ear realization coefficient (ESC)”
t0“SPRING TRITICALE”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar feeding increased Timur yield by 10.3-18.2%.
- Taxon
- SPRING TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Timur varietye0
- Treatment
- foliar feedinge0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 10.3-18.2%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on Timur variety the yield increase from foliar feeding was at the level of 10.3-18.2%”
t0“SPRING TRITICALE”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar feeding increased Orden yield by 6.1-13.9%.
- Taxon
- SPRING TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Orden varietye0
- Treatment
- top dressinge1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 6.1-13.9%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“on Orden variety - 6.1-13.9%”
e1“The use of top dressing increased the yield of spring triticale”
t0“SPRING TRITICALE”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium-Silicon increased Timur yield by 0.65 t/ha.
- Taxon
- SPRING TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Timur varietye0
- Treatment
- IZAGRI Potassium-Silicon fertilizere0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.65 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On Timur variety the greatest increase in yield (by 0.65 t/ha) was ensured by the use of IZAGRI Potassium-Silicon fertilizer.”
t0“SPRING TRITICALE”
Claim · model-written summary
IZAGRI Vita increased Orden yield by 0.54 t/ha.
- Taxon
- SPRING TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Orden varietye0
- Treatment
- IZAGRI Vitae0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.54 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On Orden variety approximately the same yield was ensured by the use of IZAGRI Vita (an increase of 0.54 t/ha) and IZAGRI Potassium-Silicon (0.52 t/ha).”
t0“SPRING TRITICALE”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium-Silicon increased Orden yield by 0.52 t/ha.
- Taxon
- SPRING TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Orden varietye0
- Treatment
- IZAGRI Potassium-Silicone0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.52 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On Orden variety approximately the same yield was ensured by the use of IZAGRI Vita (an increase of 0.54 t/ha) and IZAGRI Potassium-Silicon (0.52 t/ha).”
t0“SPRING TRITICALE”
Claim · model-written summary
Orden grain protein content was significantly higher than Timur.
- Taxon
- SPRING TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Orden varietye0
- Outcome
- protein content in the graine0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- Timure0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In Orden variety the protein content in the grain is significantly higher than in Timur one.”
t0“SPRING TRITICALE”
Claim · model-written summary
Potassium-Silicon produced the maximum protein yield per hectare.
- Taxon
- SPRING TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- IZAGRI Potassium-Silicon fertilizere0
- Outcome
- protein yield from 1 hae0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum protein yield from 1 ha was obtained when using IZAGRI Potassium-Silicon fertilizer”
t0“SPRING TRITICALE”
Claim · model-written summary
Authors recommend Potassium-Silicon for spring triticale cultivation in Kama region.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Treatment
- IZAGRI Potassium-Silicon fertilizere1
- Outcome
- inclusion in Agrotechnology for spring triticale cultivatione0
- Setting
- Kama region of the Republic of Tatarstane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“recommend it for inclusion in Agrotechnology for spring triticale cultivation in Kama region of the Republic of Tatarstan”
e1“IZAGRI Potassium-Silicon fertilizer, which allows us”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results differ
84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
94 papers more in this group
See all 98 papers →potassium · quality: protein · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
fertilization · quality: protein · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →micronutrient · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
potassium · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.