Paper · 2016 · Plant Soil and Environment

The after-effect of chosen Fabaceae forecrops on the yield of grain and protein in winter triticale (Triticosecale sp. Wittmack ex A. Camus 1927) fertilized with mineral nitrogen

J. Prusinski; M. Borowska; E. Kaszkowiak; et al.

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Two-way field experiment was carried out in a split-plot design in 4 growing seasons at the Experimental Station of the Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology in Mochełek (Poland). The forecrops for winter triticale cv. Tulus were lupins: yellow, blue and white, field pea and spring barley. Nitrogen (N) fertilization in triticale after harvesting forecrops was: 0-60-120-180 kg N per ha. Average long-term yields of grain and protein in triticale after leguminous forecrops were statistically similar, by 0.84 t/ha and 86 kg/ha higher than after spring barley. On plots without mineral N fertilization, by over 1.5 t/ha more grain was obtained after leguminous forecrops, and by 142 kg/ha more protein than on the plot after spring barley. However, the rate of 180 kg N/ha guaranteed obtaining a significantly highest mean protein yield in triticale. The applied mineral N fertilization at rates from 60 to 180 kg N/ha did not significantly vary the average yield of winter triticale. Mineral nitrogen (Nmin) content in the layer 0-60 cm after harvesting the leguminous forecrop without mineral N fertilization was by 25.5% higher than after harvesting spring barley fertilized with a rate of 60 kg N per ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield of triticale after leguminous forecrops was 0.84 t/ha higher than after spring barley.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
leguminous forecropse0
Outcome
yields of graine0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.84 t/hae0
Comparator
spring barleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average long-term yields of grain and protein in triticale after leguminous forecrops were statistically similar, by 0.84 t/ha and 86 kg/ha higher than after spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein yield of triticale after leguminous forecrops was 86 kg/ha higher than after spring barley.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
leguminous forecropse0
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
highere0
Value
86 kg/hae0
Comparator
spring barleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average long-term yields of grain and protein in triticale after leguminous forecrops were statistically similar, by 0.84 t/ha and 86 kg/ha higher than after spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On plots without mineral N fertilization, grain yield after leguminous forecrops was over 1.5 t/ha higher.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
leguminous forecropse1
Outcome
graine1
Direction
moree1
Value
over 1.5 t/hae1
Qualifier
without mineral N fertilizatione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average long-term yields of grain and protein in triticale after leguminous forecrops were statistically similar, by 0.84 t/ha and 86 kg/ha higher than after spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–570 · show in text ↑
e1

“On plots without mineral N fertilization, by over 1.5 t/ha more grain was obtained after leguminous forecrops, and by 142 kg/ha more protein than on the plot after spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On plots without mineral N fertilization, protein yield after leguminous forecrops was 142 kg/ha higher than after spring barley.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
leguminous forecropse1
Outcome
proteine1
Direction
moree1
Value
142 kg/hae1
Qualifier
without mineral N fertilizatione1
Comparator
spring barleye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average long-term yields of grain and protein in triticale after leguminous forecrops were statistically similar, by 0.84 t/ha and 86 kg/ha higher than after spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–570 · show in text ↑
e1

“On plots without mineral N fertilization, by over 1.5 t/ha more grain was obtained after leguminous forecrops, and by 142 kg/ha more protein than on the plot after spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The rate of 180 kg N/ha gave a significantly highest mean protein yield in triticale.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee2
Treatment
180 kg N/hae2
Outcome
mean protein yielde2
Direction
significantly higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“However, the rate of 180 kg N/ha guaranteed obtaining a significantly highest mean protein yield in triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–860 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral N fertilization at rates from 60 to 180 kg N/ha did not significantly change the average yield of winter triticale.

Taxon
winter triticale×Triticosecalee3
Treatment
mineral N fertilization at rates from 60 to 180 kg N/hae3
Outcome
average yielde3
Direction
did not significantly varye3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The applied mineral N fertilization at rates from 60 to 180 kg N/ha did not significantly vary the average yield of winter triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nmin content in the 0-60 cm layer after leguminous forecrop without mineral N was 25.5% higher than after spring barley fertilized with 60 kg N/ha.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
leguminous forecrope5
Outcome
Mineral nitrogen (Nmin) contente5
Direction
highere5
Value
25.5%e5
Qualifier
in the layer 0-60 cme5
Comparator
spring barleye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average long-term yields of grain and protein in triticale after leguminous forecrops were statistically similar, by 0.84 t/ha and 86 kg/ha higher than after spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–570 · show in text ↑
e5

“Mineral nitrogen (Nmin) content in the layer 0-60 cm after harvesting the leguminous forecrop without mineral N fertilization was by 25.5% higher than after harvesting spring barley fertilized with a rate of 60 kg N per ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1218 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain and protein yields after leguminous forecrops were statistically similar.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Outcome
yields of grain and proteine0
Qualifier
statistically similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average long-term yields of grain and protein in triticale after leguminous forecrops were statistically similar, by 0.84 t/ha and 86 kg/ha higher than after spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–570 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results differ

98 papers: 85 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

nitrogen · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 48 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.