Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of phosphorus and iron on nutrient uptake and yield of green gram (Vigna radiata L.)

Auti YM; Prajapat AL; Pingale MK; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during Kharif 2024 at the Research Farm of Vivekananda Global University, Jaipur, to evaluate Effect of phosphorus and iron on nutrient uptake and yeild of greengram (Vigna radiata L.). The study employed a factorial randomized block design with 16 treatment combinations, involving four phosphorus levels (0, 20, 40, and 60 kg/ha) and four iron treatments (control, 15 kg/ha basal application, 1.0% foliar spray at 25 and 40 DAS, and 1.0% foliar spray at 25, 40, and 55 DAS), each replicated thrice. The results demonstrated significant improvements in growth attributes, yield components, seed yield, nutrient uptake, and protein content with increasing phosphorus and iron levels. Notably, the combined application of 60 kg P/ha with three foliar sprays of iron resulted in the highest values for plant height, dry matter accumulation, pod number, seed yield, and protein content. Nutrient uptake of N, P, and Fe was also maximized under this treatment. From an economic perspective, this combination yielded the highest net return and benefit-cost ratio. The findings underscore the importance of integrated phosphorus and iron management for improving greengram productivity and nutritional quality under semi-arid conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing phosphorus and iron levels significantly improved growth attributes and yield components of green gram.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
increasing phosphorus and iron levelse0
Outcome
growth attributes, yield componentse0
Direction
improvementse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results demonstrated significant improvements in growth attributes, yield components, seed yield, nutrient uptake, and protein content with increasing phosphorus and iron levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing phosphorus and iron levels significantly improved seed yield, nutrient uptake and protein content of green gram.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
increasing phosphorus and iron levelse0
Outcome
seed yield, nutrient uptake, and protein contente0
Direction
improvementse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results demonstrated significant improvements in growth attributes, yield components, seed yield, nutrient uptake, and protein content with increasing phosphorus and iron levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of 60 kg P/ha with three foliar iron sprays gave the highest plant height, dry matter accumulation and pod number in green gram.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
combined application of 60 kg P/ha with three foliar sprays of irone0
Outcome
plant height, dry matter accumulation, pod numbere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“the combined application of 60 kg P/ha with three foliar sprays of iron resulted in the highest values for plant height, dry matter accumulation, pod number, seed yield, and protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of 60 kg P/ha with three foliar iron sprays gave the highest seed yield and protein content in green gram.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
combined application of 60 kg P/ha with three foliar sprays of irone0
Outcome
seed yield, and protein contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“the combined application of 60 kg P/ha with three foliar sprays of iron resulted in the highest values for plant height, dry matter accumulation, pod number, seed yield, and protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient uptake of N, P and Fe in green gram was maximized under 60 kg P/ha with three foliar iron sprays.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
60 kg P/ha with three foliar sprays of irone1
Outcome
Nutrient uptake of N, P, and Fee0
Direction
maximizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nutrient uptake of N, P, and Fe was also maximized under this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–990 · show in text ↑
e1

“60 kg P/ha with three foliar sprays of iron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–799 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of 60 kg P/ha with three foliar iron sprays gave the highest net return and benefit-cost ratio.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
60 kg P/ha with three foliar sprays of irone1
Outcome
net return and benefit-cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“this combination yielded the highest net return and benefit-cost ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1092 · show in text ↑
e1

“60 kg P/ha with three foliar sprays of iron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–799 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated phosphorus and iron management is recommended for improving greengram productivity and nutritional quality under semi-arid conditions.

Outcome
greengram productivity and nutritional qualitye0
Setting
semi-arid conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The findings underscore the importance of integrated phosphorus and iron management for improving greengram productivity and nutritional quality under semi-arid conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1265 · show in text ↑

iron atom · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

iron atom · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

iron atom · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

179 papers: 175 positive, 4 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

175 papers more in this group

See all 179 papers →

application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

216 papers: 209 positive, 7 negative or no effect

208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

212 papers more in this group

See all 216 papers →

phosphorus · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

29 papers: 29 positive, 0 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

application · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

30 papers: 30 positive, 0 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.