Paper · 2018

Effect of Foliar Application of Iron and Manganese on Yield and Yield Components of Mungbean under Water Deficit Stress

S. Aghdasi; Sam Modares Sanavy; Majid AghaAlikhani; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Water stress is one of the factors whish reduces the amount of nutrient uptake, greatly. In order to study the effect of foliar application of iron and manganese on yield and yield components of the mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Parto) under water deficit stress, an experiment was conducted as a complete randomized block design with split plot arrangement in three replications. Main plots were three levels of irrigation stoppings (With out stopping irrigation, with one irrigation turn stopping at each of the primary growth and the production stages, respectively) and submain plots were combination of foliar iron and manganese applications. The levels of foliar application were no foliar application (as control), water foliar application,iron sulfate 1%, iron sulfate 1.5%, manganese sulfate 0.5%, manganese sulfate 1%,iron sulfate 1%+manganese sulfate 0.5% and iron sulfate 1.5%+manganese sulfate 1%. The results showed that the treatment of water deficit stress at the vegetative and production stages had a significant effect on yield and yield components of the varieties of the mung bean. The hightest effect of water stress was related to the production stage. The combined foliar application of the iron and manganese significantly increased the grain yield, number of the pods per plant, grain weight, plant height, leaf area index, and grain iron and manganese content. However, drought stress reduced the studied traits, but foliar application of iron and manganese resulted in plant resistance that caused delay in appearance of the water stress in plant and thus improved the production performance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit stress at the vegetative and production stages had a significant effect on yield and yield components of mung bean.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
water deficit stress at the vegetative and production stagese1
Outcome
yield and yield componentse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The results showed that the treatment of water deficit stress at the vegetative and production stages had a significant effect on yield and yield components of the varieties of the mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1099 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest effect of water stress was related to the production stage.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
water stresse2
Outcome
effect of water stresse2
Direction
highteste2
Qualifier
related to the production stagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and Yield Components of Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–92 · show in text ↑
e2

“The hightest effect of water stress was related to the production stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress reduced the studied traits of mung bean.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
drought stresse5
Outcome
studied traitse5
Direction
reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and Yield Components of Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–92 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, drought stress reduced the studied traits, but foliar application of iron and manganese resulted in plant resistance that caused delay in appearance of the water stress in plant and thus improved the production performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar iron and manganese application significantly increased grain yield, pods per plant and grain weight compared with no foliar application.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
combined foliar application of the iron and manganesee3
Outcome
grain yield, number of the pods per plant, grain weighte3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
no foliar applicatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and Yield Components of Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–92 · show in text ↑
e3

“The combined foliar application of the iron and manganese significantly increased the grain yield, number of the pods per plant, grain weight, plant height, leaf area index, and grain iron and manganese content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1384 · show in text ↑
e4

“no foliar application (as control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar iron and manganese application significantly increased plant height and leaf area index compared with no foliar application.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
combined foliar application of the iron and manganesee3
Outcome
plant height, leaf area indexe3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
no foliar applicatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and Yield Components of Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–92 · show in text ↑
e3

“The combined foliar application of the iron and manganese significantly increased the grain yield, number of the pods per plant, grain weight, plant height, leaf area index, and grain iron and manganese content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1384 · show in text ↑
e4

“no foliar application (as control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar iron and manganese application significantly increased grain iron and manganese content compared with no foliar application.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
combined foliar application of the iron and manganesee3
Outcome
grain iron and manganese contente3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
no foliar applicatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and Yield Components of Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–92 · show in text ↑
e3

“The combined foliar application of the iron and manganese significantly increased the grain yield, number of the pods per plant, grain weight, plant height, leaf area index, and grain iron and manganese content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1384 · show in text ↑
e4

“no foliar application (as control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–718 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar iron and manganese application improved mung bean production performance by delaying the appearance of water stress through plant resistance.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
foliar application of iron and manganesee5
Outcome
production performancee5
Qualifier
plant resistance that caused delay in appearance of the water stresse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and Yield Components of Mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–92 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, drought stress reduced the studied traits, but foliar application of iron and manganese resulted in plant resistance that caused delay in appearance of the water stress in plant and thus improved the production performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1617 · show in text ↑

manganese atom · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

manganese atom · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

manganese atom · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

iron atom · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

iron atom · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

iron atom · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

drought · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

41 papers: 7 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

application · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

98 papers: 94 positive, 4 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.