Abstract
An experiment was laid out to study the response of green gram (Co.2) to phos phorus application under irrigation. Phosphorus application through soil increased the plant height on 45th day and at harvest but there was no difference between P levels tested. Foliar application of P decreased the height. Leaf area index and the yield com- ponents such as number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and thousand grain weight were not influenced by P application. Neither grain yield nor stalk yield was aff- ected by P application. For a short duration variety like Co.2. P application produces little response in a soil with medium available P status.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Soil phosphorus application increased plant height on the 45th day and at harvest.
- Taxon
- green gram
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiata var. radiatae0 - Material
- Co.2e0
- Treatment
- Phosphorus application through soile1
- Outcome
- plant height on 45th day and at harveste1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Setting
- under irrigatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“response of green gram (Co.2) to phos phorus application under irrigation”
e1“Phosphorus application through soil increased the plant height on 45th day and at harvest but there was no difference between P levels tested”
Claim · model-written summary
The P levels tested through soil did not differ in plant height.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Material
- Co.2e0
- Treatment
- P levels testede1
- Outcome
- plant heighte1
- Direction
- no differencee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of green gram (Co.2) to phos phorus application under irrigation”
e1“Phosphorus application through soil increased the plant height on 45th day and at harvest but there was no difference between P levels tested”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar P application decreased plant height.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- Foliar application of Pe2
- Outcome
- heighte2
- Direction
- decreasede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of green gram (Co.2) to phos phorus application under irrigation”
e2“Foliar application of P decreased the height”
Claim · model-written summary
P application did not influence leaf area index.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- P applicatione3
- Outcome
- Leaf area indexe3
- Direction
- not influencede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of green gram (Co.2) to phos phorus application under irrigation”
e3“Leaf area index and the yield com- ponents such as number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and thousand grain weight were not influenced by P application”
Claim · model-written summary
P application did not influence number of pods per plant or number of seeds per pod.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- P applicatione3
- Outcome
- number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pode3
- Direction
- not influencede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of green gram (Co.2) to phos phorus application under irrigation”
e3“Leaf area index and the yield com- ponents such as number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and thousand grain weight were not influenced by P application”
Claim · model-written summary
P application did not influence thousand grain weight.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- P applicatione3
- Outcome
- thousand grain weighte3
- Direction
- not influencede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of green gram (Co.2) to phos phorus application under irrigation”
e3“Leaf area index and the yield com- ponents such as number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and thousand grain weight were not influenced by P application”
Claim · model-written summary
P application did not affect grain yield or stalk yield.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- P applicatione4
- Outcome
- grain yield nor stalk yielde4
- Direction
- was aff- ectede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of green gram (Co.2) to phos phorus application under irrigation”
e4“Neither grain yield nor stalk yield was aff- ected by P application”
Claim · model-written summary
For the short-duration variety Co.2, P application gave little response in a soil with medium available P status.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Material
- Co.2e5
- Treatment
- P applicatione5
- Outcome
- responsee5
- Direction
- littlee5
- Qualifier
- short duration varietye5
- Setting
- a soil with medium available P statuse5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“response of green gram (Co.2) to phos phorus application under irrigation”
e5“For a short duration variety like Co.2. P application produces little response in a soil with medium available P status”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 175 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
175 papers more in this group
See all 179 papers →phosphorus · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
64 papers more in this group
See all 68 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.