Paper · 2024 · Scientific Reports

Morphophysiological, biochemical, and nutrient response of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) by foliar CeO2 nanoparticles under elevated CO2

Shoaib Ahmad; Adiba Khan Sehrish; Fuxun Ai; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Nanomaterials offer considerable benefits in improving plant growth and nutritional status owing to their inherent stability, and efficiency in essential nutrient absorption and delivery. Cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO 2 NPs) at optimum concentration could significantly influence plant morpho-physiology and nutritional status. However, it remains unclear how elevated CO 2 and CeO 2 NPs interactively affect plant growth and quality. Accordingly, the ultimate goal was to reveal whether CeO 2 NPs could alter the impact of elevated CO 2 on the nutrient composition of spinach. For this purpose, spinach plant morpho-physiological, biochemical traits, and nutritional contents were evaluated. Spinach was exposed to different foliar concentrations of CeO 2 NPs (0, 25, 50, 100 mg/L) in open-top chambers (400 and 600 CO 2 μmol/mol). Results showed that elevated CO 2 enhanced spinach growth by increasing photosynthetic pigments, as evidenced by a higher photosynthetic rate (Pn). However, the maximum growth and photosynthetic pigments were observed at the highest concentration of CeO 2 NPs (100 mg/L) under elevated CO 2 . Elevated CO 2 resulted in a decreased stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration rate (Tr), whereas CeO 2 NPs enhanced these parameters. No significant changes were observed in any of the measured biochemical parameters due to increased levels of CO 2 . However, an increase in antioxidant enzymes, particularly in catalase (CAT; 14.37%) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX; 10.66%) activities, was observed in high CeO 2 NPs (100 mg/L) treatment under elevated CO 2 levels. Regarding plant nutrient content, elevated CO 2 significantly decreases spinach roots and leaves macro and micronutrients as compared to ambient CO 2 levels. CeO 2 NPs, in a dose-dependent manner, with the highest increase observed in 100 mg/L CeO 2 NPs treatment and increased roots and shoots magnesium (211.62–215.49%), iron (256.68–322.77%), zinc (225.89–181.49%), copper (21.99–138.09%), potassium (121.46–138.89%), calcium (118.22–91.32%), manganese (133.15–195.02%) under elevated CO 2 . Overall, CeO 2 NPs improved spinach growth and biomass and reverted the adverse effects of elevated CO 2 on its nutritional quality. These findings indicated that CeO 2 NPs could be used as an effective approach to increase vegetable growth and nutritional values to ensure food security under future climatic conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 enhanced spinach growth.

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceat0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e1
Outcome
spinach growthe1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“elevated CO 2 enhanced spinach growth by increasing photosynthetic pigments, as evidenced by a higher photosynthetic rate (Pn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased photosynthetic pigments in spinach.

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceat0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e1
Outcome
photosynthetic pigmentse1
Direction
increasinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“elevated CO 2 enhanced spinach growth by increasing photosynthetic pigments, as evidenced by a higher photosynthetic rate (Pn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased the photosynthetic rate (Pn) of spinach.

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceat0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e1
Outcome
photosynthetic rate (Pn)e1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“elevated CO 2 enhanced spinach growth by increasing photosynthetic pigments, as evidenced by a higher photosynthetic rate (Pn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest CeO2 NP concentration (100 mg/L) under elevated CO2 gave the maximum growth and photosynthetic pigments.

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceat0
Treatment
highest concentration of CeO 2 NPs (100 mg/L)e2
Outcome
growth and photosynthetic pigmentse2
Direction
maximume2
Qualifier
under elevated CO 2e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“the maximum growth and photosynthetic pigments were observed at the highest concentration of CeO 2 NPs (100 mg/L) under elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased stomatal conductance and transpiration rate of spinach.

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceat0
Treatment
Elevated CO 2e3
Outcome
stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration rate (Tr)e3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 · show in text ↑
e3

“Elevated CO 2 resulted in a decreased stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration rate (Tr), whereas CeO 2 NPs enhanced these parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CeO2 NPs enhanced stomatal conductance and transpiration rate of spinach.

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceat0
Treatment
CeO 2 NPse3
Outcome
stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration rate (Tr)e3
Direction
enhancede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 · show in text ↑
e3

“Elevated CO 2 resulted in a decreased stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration rate (Tr), whereas CeO 2 NPs enhanced these parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 caused no significant change in any measured biochemical parameter of spinach.

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceat0
Treatment
increased levels of CO 2e4
Outcome
any of the measured biochemical parameterse4
Direction
No significant changese4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 · show in text ↑
e4

“No significant changes were observed in any of the measured biochemical parameters due to increased levels of CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Catalase activity in spinach rose by 14.37% at 100 mg/L CeO2 NPs under elevated CO2.

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceat0
Treatment
high CeO 2 NPs (100 mg/L) treatmente5
Outcome
antioxidant enzymese5
Direction
increasee5
Value
14.37%e5
Qualifier
catalase (CAT; 14.37%)e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 · show in text ↑
e5

“an increase in antioxidant enzymes, particularly in catalase (CAT; 14.37%) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX; 10.66%) activities, was observed in high CeO 2 NPs (100 mg/L) treatment under elevated CO 2 levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbate peroxidase activity in spinach rose by 10.66% at 100 mg/L CeO2 NPs under elevated CO2.

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceat0
Treatment
high CeO 2 NPs (100 mg/L) treatmente5
Outcome
antioxidant enzymese5
Direction
increasee5
Value
10.66%e5
Qualifier
ascorbate peroxidase (APX; 10.66%)e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 · show in text ↑
e5

“an increase in antioxidant enzymes, particularly in catalase (CAT; 14.37%) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX; 10.66%) activities, was observed in high CeO 2 NPs (100 mg/L) treatment under elevated CO 2 levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased macro and micronutrient contents in spinach roots and leaves compared with ambient CO2.

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceat0
Organ / stage
roots and leavese6
Treatment
elevated CO 2e6
Outcome
macro and micronutrientse6
Direction
decreasese6
Comparator
ambient CO 2 levelse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 · show in text ↑
e6

“elevated CO 2 significantly decreases spinach roots and leaves macro and micronutrients as compared to ambient CO 2 levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CeO2 NPs at 100 mg/L under elevated CO2 increased root and shoot magnesium by 211.62–215.49%.

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceat0
Organ / stage
roots and shootse7
Treatment
100 mg/L CeO 2 NPs treatmente7
Outcome
magnesiume7
Direction
increasede7
Value
211.62–215.49%e7
Qualifier
under elevated CO 2e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 · show in text ↑
e7

“CeO 2 NPs, in a dose-dependent manner, with the highest increase observed in 100 mg/L CeO 2 NPs treatment and increased roots and shoots magnesium (211.62–215.49%), iron (256.68–322.77%), zinc (225.89–181.49%), copper (21.99–138.09%), potassium (121.46–138.89%), calcium (118.22–91.32%), manganese (133.15–195.02%) under elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–2090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CeO2 NPs at 100 mg/L under elevated CO2 increased root and shoot iron by 256.68–322.77%.

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceat0
Organ / stage
roots and shootse7
Treatment
100 mg/L CeO 2 NPs treatmente7
Outcome
irone7
Direction
increasede7
Value
256.68–322.77%e7
Qualifier
under elevated CO 2e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 · show in text ↑
e7

“CeO 2 NPs, in a dose-dependent manner, with the highest increase observed in 100 mg/L CeO 2 NPs treatment and increased roots and shoots magnesium (211.62–215.49%), iron (256.68–322.77%), zinc (225.89–181.49%), copper (21.99–138.09%), potassium (121.46–138.89%), calcium (118.22–91.32%), manganese (133.15–195.02%) under elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–2090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CeO2 NPs at 100 mg/L under elevated CO2 changed root and shoot zinc by 225.89–181.49%.

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceat0
Organ / stage
roots and shootse7
Treatment
100 mg/L CeO 2 NPs treatmente7
Outcome
zince7
Direction
increasede7
Value
225.89–181.49%e7
Qualifier
under elevated CO 2e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 · show in text ↑
e7

“CeO 2 NPs, in a dose-dependent manner, with the highest increase observed in 100 mg/L CeO 2 NPs treatment and increased roots and shoots magnesium (211.62–215.49%), iron (256.68–322.77%), zinc (225.89–181.49%), copper (21.99–138.09%), potassium (121.46–138.89%), calcium (118.22–91.32%), manganese (133.15–195.02%) under elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–2090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CeO2 NPs at 100 mg/L under elevated CO2 increased root and shoot copper by 21.99–138.09%.

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceat0
Organ / stage
roots and shootse7
Treatment
100 mg/L CeO 2 NPs treatmente7
Outcome
coppere7
Direction
increasede7
Value
21.99–138.09%e7
Qualifier
under elevated CO 2e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 · show in text ↑
e7

“CeO 2 NPs, in a dose-dependent manner, with the highest increase observed in 100 mg/L CeO 2 NPs treatment and increased roots and shoots magnesium (211.62–215.49%), iron (256.68–322.77%), zinc (225.89–181.49%), copper (21.99–138.09%), potassium (121.46–138.89%), calcium (118.22–91.32%), manganese (133.15–195.02%) under elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–2090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CeO2 NPs at 100 mg/L under elevated CO2 increased root and shoot potassium by 121.46–138.89%.

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceat0
Organ / stage
roots and shootse7
Treatment
100 mg/L CeO 2 NPs treatmente7
Outcome
potassiume7
Direction
increasede7
Value
121.46–138.89%e7
Qualifier
under elevated CO 2e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 · show in text ↑
e7

“CeO 2 NPs, in a dose-dependent manner, with the highest increase observed in 100 mg/L CeO 2 NPs treatment and increased roots and shoots magnesium (211.62–215.49%), iron (256.68–322.77%), zinc (225.89–181.49%), copper (21.99–138.09%), potassium (121.46–138.89%), calcium (118.22–91.32%), manganese (133.15–195.02%) under elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–2090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CeO2 NPs at 100 mg/L under elevated CO2 changed root and shoot calcium by 118.22–91.32%.

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceat0
Organ / stage
roots and shootse7
Treatment
100 mg/L CeO 2 NPs treatmente7
Outcome
calciume7
Direction
increasede7
Value
118.22–91.32%e7
Qualifier
under elevated CO 2e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 · show in text ↑
e7

“CeO 2 NPs, in a dose-dependent manner, with the highest increase observed in 100 mg/L CeO 2 NPs treatment and increased roots and shoots magnesium (211.62–215.49%), iron (256.68–322.77%), zinc (225.89–181.49%), copper (21.99–138.09%), potassium (121.46–138.89%), calcium (118.22–91.32%), manganese (133.15–195.02%) under elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–2090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CeO2 NPs at 100 mg/L under elevated CO2 increased root and shoot manganese by 133.15–195.02%.

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceat0
Organ / stage
roots and shootse7
Treatment
100 mg/L CeO 2 NPs treatmente7
Outcome
manganesee7
Direction
increasede7
Value
133.15–195.02%e7
Qualifier
under elevated CO 2e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 · show in text ↑
e7

“CeO 2 NPs, in a dose-dependent manner, with the highest increase observed in 100 mg/L CeO 2 NPs treatment and increased roots and shoots magnesium (211.62–215.49%), iron (256.68–322.77%), zinc (225.89–181.49%), copper (21.99–138.09%), potassium (121.46–138.89%), calcium (118.22–91.32%), manganese (133.15–195.02%) under elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–2090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CeO2 NPs improved spinach growth and biomass.

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceat0
Treatment
CeO 2 NPse1
Outcome
spinach growth and biomasse1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“CeO 2 NPs improved spinach growth and biomass and reverted the adverse effects of elevated CO 2 on its nutritional quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2102–2224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CeO2 NPs reverted the adverse effects of elevated CO2 on spinach nutritional quality.

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceat0
Treatment
CeO 2 NPse1
Outcome
nutritional qualitye1
Direction
revertede1
Qualifier
adverse effects of elevated CO 2e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“CeO 2 NPs improved spinach growth and biomass and reverted the adverse effects of elevated CO 2 on its nutritional quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2102–2224 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

CeO2 NPs could be an effective approach to increase vegetable growth and nutritional value under future climate conditions (author interpretation).

Taxon
Spinacia oleracea L.Spinacia oleraceat0
Outcome
an effective approach to increase vegetable growth and nutritional valuese1
Setting
future climatic conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“CeO 2 NPs could be used as an effective approach to increase vegetable growth and nutritional values to ensure food security under future climatic conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2256–2413 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: photosynthesis · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.