Paper · 2016 · American Journal of Plant Sciences

Elevated Carbon Dioxide Level Suppresses Nutritional Quality of Lettuce and Spinach

Anju Giri; Brenden Armstrong; Channa B. Rajashekar

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
51
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Rising global CO2 levels are a major factor that impacts not only the environment but also many plant functions including growth, productivity and nutritional quality. The study examined the impact of elevated [CO2] on nutritional quality and growth characteristics of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and spinach (Spinacia oleracea). Elevated [CO2] decreased the concentration of many important nutrients including nitrogen (protein), potassium and phosphorus in the edible parts of both lettuce and spinach. The nitrogen concentration in lettuce shoots was reduced by more than 30% at elevated [CO2] compared to the plants grown at ambient level of CO2. Similarly the concentration of a number of micronutrients including sulfur, zinc, copper and magnesium, was depressed in lettuce shoots. Although the total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity were higher in lettuce at elevated CO2, they were not affected in spinach. The photosynthetic activity was variable among the plant species while there was no increase in the carbon accumulation in these plants at elevated [CO2]. However, there was significant reduction in the leaf stomatal conductance in both lettuce and spinach in response to higher [CO2], which is likely affect both water loss from the leaves and their photosynthetic activity. The results indicate a broad adverse impact of rising [CO2] on the nutritional quality of commonly consumed leafy vegetables namely, lettuce and spinach.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased nitrogen (protein), potassium and phosphorus concentrations in the edible parts of lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Organ / stage
edible partse1
Treatment
Elevated [CO2]e1
Outcome
nitrogen (protein), potassium and phosphoruse1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Elevated [CO2] decreased the concentration of many important nutrients including nitrogen (protein), potassium and phosphorus in the edible parts of both lettuce and spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased nitrogen (protein), potassium and phosphorus concentrations in the edible parts of spinach.

Organ / stage
edible partse1
Treatment
Elevated [CO2]e1
Outcome
nitrogen (protein), potassium and phosphoruse1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Elevated [CO2] decreased the concentration of many important nutrients including nitrogen (protein), potassium and phosphorus in the edible parts of both lettuce and spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced nitrogen concentration in lettuce shoots by more than 30%.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae2
Organ / stage
shootse2
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e2
Outcome
nitrogen concentratione2
Direction
reducede2
Value
more than 30%e2
Comparator
ambient level of CO2e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The nitrogen concentration in lettuce shoots was reduced by more than 30% at elevated [CO2] compared to the plants grown at ambient level of CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 depressed concentrations of sulfur, zinc, copper and magnesium in lettuce shoots.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae3
Organ / stage
shootse3
Treatment
Elevated [CO2]e1
Outcome
concentration of a number of micronutrients including sulfur, zinc, copper and magnesiume3
Direction
depressede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Elevated [CO2] decreased the concentration of many important nutrients including nitrogen (protein), potassium and phosphorus in the edible parts of both lettuce and spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–500 · show in text ↑
e3

“Similarly the concentration of a number of micronutrients including sulfur, zinc, copper and magnesium, was depressed in lettuce shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 raised total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae4
Treatment
elevated CO2e4
Outcome
total phenolic content and antioxidant capacitye4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Although the total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity were higher in lettuce at elevated CO2, they were not affected in spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–919 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 did not affect total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity in spinach.

Treatment
elevated CO2e4
Outcome
total phenolic content and antioxidant capacitye4
Direction
not affectede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Although the total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity were higher in lettuce at elevated CO2, they were not affected in spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–919 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 did not increase carbon accumulation in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e5
Outcome
carbon accumulatione5
Direction
no increasee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the impact of elevated [CO2] on nutritional quality and growth characteristics of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and spinach (Spinacia oleracea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–325 · show in text ↑
e5

“there was no increase in the carbon accumulation in these plants at elevated [CO2]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 did not increase carbon accumulation in spinach.

Treatment
elevated [CO2]e5
Outcome
carbon accumulatione5
Direction
no increasee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the impact of elevated [CO2] on nutritional quality and growth characteristics of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and spinach (Spinacia oleracea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–325 · show in text ↑
e5

“there was no increase in the carbon accumulation in these plants at elevated [CO2]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher CO2 significantly reduced leaf stomatal conductance in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae6
Treatment
higher [CO2]e6
Outcome
leaf stomatal conductancee6
Direction
reductione6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“there was significant reduction in the leaf stomatal conductance in both lettuce and spinach in response to higher [CO2]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher CO2 significantly reduced leaf stomatal conductance in spinach.

Treatment
higher [CO2]e6
Outcome
leaf stomatal conductancee6
Direction
reductione6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“there was significant reduction in the leaf stomatal conductance in both lettuce and spinach in response to higher [CO2]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1205 · show in text ↑

co2 · quality: phytochemicals · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

co2 · quality: protein · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

co2 · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

co2 · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.