Paper · 2024 · npj Sustainable Agriculture

Mulched drip irrigation: a promising practice for sustainable agriculture in China’s arid region

Zhenhua Wang; Rui Chen; Wenhao Li; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
33
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The long-term practice of mulched drip irrigation (MDI) has significantly advanced cotton production in China’s arid regions. In this study, we conducted an evaluation of the changes to key soil environmental factors within cotton fields under MDI, providing a holistic assessment of MDI sustainability. Specifically, long-term MDI demonstrated numerous benefits including improved soil salinity management, nutrient retention, soil structure, and microbial functions. Collectively, these changes contribute to enhanced overall soil quality. Our research also confirms MDI as an effective integrated water-saving technology approach. Affirming the sustainability of widespread MDI promotion, our findings firmly support its potential as a sustainable and viable solution for oasis agriculture in arid lands, conferring long-term benefits to agricultural production in these regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term mulched drip irrigation advanced cotton production.

Treatment
mulched drip irrigation (MDI)e0
Outcome
cotton productione0
Direction
advancede0
Setting
China’s arid regionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The long-term practice of mulched drip irrigation (MDI) has significantly advanced cotton production in China’s arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term MDI improved soil salinity management, nutrient retention, and soil structure in cotton fields.

Treatment
long-term MDIe0
Outcome
soil salinity management, nutrient retention, soil structuree0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“long-term MDI demonstrated numerous benefits including improved soil salinity management, nutrient retention, soil structure, and microbial functions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–467 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term MDI improved soil microbial functions in cotton fields.

Treatment
long-term MDIe0
Outcome
microbial functionse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“long-term MDI demonstrated numerous benefits including improved soil salinity management, nutrient retention, soil structure, and microbial functions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–467 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MDI improved overall soil quality.

Treatment
mulched drip irrigation (MDI)e1
Outcome
overall soil qualitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these changes contribute to enhanced overall soil quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–540 · show in text ↑
e1

“mulched drip irrigation (MDI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–237 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MDI was effective as an integrated water-saving technology.

Outcome
effective integrated water-saving technology approache0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MDI as an effective integrated water-saving technology approach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–632 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–237 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors support promoting MDI in arid oasis agriculture.

Treatment
mulched drip irrigation (MDI)e1
Outcome
sustainable and viable solution for oasis agriculture in arid landse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“our findings firmly support its potential as a sustainable and viable solution for oasis agriculture in arid lands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–806 · show in text ↑
e1

“mulched drip irrigation (MDI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–55 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–237 · show in text ↑

mulching · quality: general · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

irrigation · quality: general · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 12 positive, 6 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 27 positive, 5 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

mulching · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 59 positive, 4 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

irrigation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 304 positive, 95 negative or no effect

303 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

395 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

mulching · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.