Paper · 2025 · Agricultural Water Management

Water-fertilizer optimization significantly improved cotton yield under dry-sowing and wet-emergence pattern: The case study in arid area of Southern Xinjiang, China

Feifei Jia; Dong Zeng; Bo Zhou; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Dry-sowing and wet-emergence (DSWE) has emerged as a promising water and fertilizer management strategy in arid regions, reducing irrigation water use by ∼40 % while ensuring uniform seedling emergence. However, research on the mechanisms through which water and fertilizer regimes of DSWE affect cotton yield in southern Xinjiang under DSWE remains limited. This study employed high-throughput 16S rRNA sequencing and structural equation modeling (SEM) to elucidate the pathways linking soil environment, microbial communities, and cotton yield under different water-fertilizer regimes. Results showed that irrigation primarily regulated soil nutrient availability and organic matter accumulation. In contrast, fertilizer type strongly influenced soil NPK contents. Their coupling significantly shaped soil microbial communities, altered nitrogen cycling functions, and ultimately affected cotton yield. Specifically, the W2 quota (517.5 mm) maintained higher soil nutrients across growth stages, and F1 fertilization increased AN, AP, and AK levels by up to 41.34 %. W2 also resulted in the highest SOM, though with reductions of up to 28.10 % in AN and 38.72 % in AP. High-throughput sequencing revealed Proteobacteria (30.47 %), Acidobacteriota (13.62 %), and Chloroflexi (11.99 %) were the dominant phyla. The most complex microbial network was observed under W2, while F2 increased network complexity by 26.44 % compared with F3. Reduced irrigation suppressed chemoheterotrophy and nitrate reduction by 32.36 % and 3.17 %, respectively. SEM indicated that irrigation quotas and fertilizer types regulated key taxa ( KD4–96 , Sphingomonadales , Xanthomonadales ), thereby influencing nitrogen cycling-related functions and yield. PCA and the entropy weight method identified W2F2 as the optimal water-fertilizer combination for efficient cotton production in arid and semi-arid regions. • Irrigation regulated soil nutrients and SOM; fertilizer affected NPK levels. • Water-fertilizer coupling reshaped microbial communities and N cycling. • W2 maintained higher soil nutrients and SOM throughout growth stages. • Key taxa ( KD4–96 , Sphingomonadales , Xanthomonadales ) linked practices to yield. • W2F2 identified as optimal water-fertilizer regime for arid cotton production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W2 maintained higher soil nutrients across growth stages.

Organ / stage
growth stagese0
Treatment
W2 quota (517.5 mm)e0
Outcome
soil nutrientse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“W2 quota (517.5 mm) maintained higher soil nutrients across growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 fertilization increased soil AN, AP and AK by up to 41.34%.

Treatment
F1 fertilizatione0
Outcome
AN, AP, and AK levelse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
41.34 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F1 fertilization increased AN, AP, and AK levels by up to 41.34 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W2 produced the highest soil organic matter.

Treatment
W2e0
Outcome
SOMe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“W2 also resulted in the highest SOM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W2 reduced AN by up to 28.10%.

Treatment
W2e0
Outcome
ANe0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
28.10 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“W2 also resulted in the highest SOM, though with reductions of up to 28.10 % in AN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W2 reduced AP by up to 38.72%.

Treatment
W2e0
Outcome
APe0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
38.72 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“W2 also resulted in the highest SOM, though with reductions of up to 28.10 % in AN and 38.72 % in AP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proteobacteria, Acidobacteriota, and Chloroflexi dominated soil microbial communities.

Interactor
ProteobacteriaPseudomonadotae0symbiont
Outcome
dominant phylae0
Qualifier
Acidobacteriota (13.62 %), and Chloroflexi (11.99 %)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proteobacteria (30.47 %), Acidobacteriota (13.62 %), and Chloroflexi (11.99 %) were the dominant phyla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W2 had the most complex microbial network.

Treatment
W2e0
Outcome
microbial networke0
Direction
most complexe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most complex microbial network was observed under W2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F2 increased network complexity by 26.44% relative to F3.

Treatment
F2e0
Outcome
network complexitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26.44 %e0
Comparator
F3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F2 increased network complexity by 26.44 % compared with F3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation suppressed chemoheterotrophy by 32.36%.

Treatment
Reduced irrigatione0
Outcome
chemoheterotrophye0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
32.36 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced irrigation suppressed chemoheterotrophy and nitrate reduction by 32.36 % and 3.17 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1541 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation suppressed nitrate reduction by 3.17%.

Treatment
Reduced irrigatione0
Outcome
nitrate reductione0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
3.17 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced irrigation suppressed chemoheterotrophy and nitrate reduction by 32.36 % and 3.17 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1541 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

W2F2 was identified as the optimal production combination.

Outcome
W2F2 as the optimal water-fertilizer combinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“identified W2F2 as the optimal water-fertilizer combination for efficient cotton production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1769–1860 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 27 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.