Paper · 2003 · Acta Agriculturae Boreali—Sinica

Effect of Mulching with Liquid-film on the Retained Boll an d Yield of Cotton

Yang Qing

7
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of mulching with liquid film on the yield o f cotton were studied in this paper in 2000 and 2001, using pest resistant cotton variety of 99B. It promoted the accumulation of dry matter in cotton fruits and enhanced the boll weight. Also a more reasonable time and space distributio n of boll setting, a decreased number of rot bolls, an increased number of high quality bolls and a higher lint yield were observed. Of all the treatments, T2 was the best, and lint output was increased by 15%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid film mulching promoted dry matter accumulation in cotton fruits.

Material
99Be3
Treatment
mulching with liquid filme2
Outcome
accumulation of dry matter in cotton fruitse0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It promoted the accumulation of dry matter in cotton fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“mulching with liquid film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–36 · show in text ↑
e3

“99B”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid film mulching enhanced boll weight.

Treatment
mulching with liquid filme2
Outcome
boll weighte0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced the boll weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–238 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
e2

“mulching with liquid film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid film mulching made boll setting more reasonably distributed in time and space.

Treatment
mulching with liquid filme2
Outcome
time and space distributio n of boll settinge0
Direction
more reasonablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a more reasonable time and space distributio n of boll setting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–307 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
e2

“mulching with liquid film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid film mulching decreased rot bolls.

Treatment
mulching with liquid filme2
Outcome
number of rot bollse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a decreased number of rot bolls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–340 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
e2

“mulching with liquid film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid film mulching increased high quality bolls.

Treatment
mulching with liquid filme2
Outcome
number of high quality bollse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increased number of high quality bolls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–383 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
e2

“mulching with liquid film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid film mulching increased lint yield.

Treatment
mulching with liquid filme2
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher lint yield were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–421 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
e2

“mulching with liquid film”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 was the best treatment and increased lint output by 15%.

Treatment
T2e0
Outcome
lint outpute0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15%e0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of all the treatments, T2 was the best, and lint output was increased by 15%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑

mulching · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

mulching · quality: general · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mulching · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

mulching · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 30 positive, 2 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

mulching · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 59 positive, 4 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.