Abstract
Cotton is a global cash crop with a significant contribution in the world economy. Optimum nutrient and water supply are most important for sustainable cotton production under warmer and dry environments. Field experiments were carried out to evaluate the cumulative impacts of various nitrogen doses and mulches on sustainable cotton production under semi-arid conditions during 2018 and 2019. Four nitrogen doses; 0, 70, 140, and 210 kg ha−1 and three types of mulch: control (without mulch), natural mulch (5 tons/ha wheat straw), and chemical mulch (methanol (30%). Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased 40.5% gunning out turn, 30.0% fiber length, 31.7% fiber strength, 32.6% fiber fineness, 20.8% fiber uniformity, and 34.0% fiber elongation. Shoot nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, calcium, and magnesium contents were maximum where 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen and mulch was applied. Natural mulch reduced the soil temperature as compared to chemical and no mulch conditions. The soil temperature was 0.5 to 1.8 ℃ lower in mulching treatments as compared to the control. Maximum economic yield was around 90% higher in natural mulch with the 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen application. It is concluded that optimum nitrogen application with natural mulch not only enhanced plant growth and development but also induced sustainability in quality cotton production under semi-arid conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased gunning out turn by 40.5%.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulchinge1
- Outcome
- gunning out turne1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 40.5%e1
- Setting
- Field experimentse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Cotton is a global cash crop”
e1“Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased 40.5% gunning out turn, 30.0% fiber length, 31.7% fiber strength, 32.6% fiber fineness, 20.8% fiber uniformity, and 34.0% fiber elongation”
e2“Field experiments were carried out”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased fiber length by 30.0%.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulchinge1
- Outcome
- fiber lengthe1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 30.0%e1
- Setting
- Field experimentse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Cotton is a global cash crop”
e1“Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased 40.5% gunning out turn, 30.0% fiber length, 31.7% fiber strength, 32.6% fiber fineness, 20.8% fiber uniformity, and 34.0% fiber elongation”
e2“Field experiments were carried out”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased fiber strength by 31.7%.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulchinge1
- Outcome
- fiber strengthe1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 31.7%e1
- Setting
- Field experimentse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Cotton is a global cash crop”
e1“Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased 40.5% gunning out turn, 30.0% fiber length, 31.7% fiber strength, 32.6% fiber fineness, 20.8% fiber uniformity, and 34.0% fiber elongation”
e2“Field experiments were carried out”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased fiber fineness by 32.6%.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulchinge1
- Outcome
- fiber finenesse1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 32.6%e1
- Setting
- Field experimentse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Cotton is a global cash crop”
e1“Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased 40.5% gunning out turn, 30.0% fiber length, 31.7% fiber strength, 32.6% fiber fineness, 20.8% fiber uniformity, and 34.0% fiber elongation”
e2“Field experiments were carried out”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased fiber uniformity by 20.8%.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulchinge1
- Outcome
- fiber uniformitye1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 20.8%e1
- Setting
- Field experimentse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Cotton is a global cash crop”
e1“Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased 40.5% gunning out turn, 30.0% fiber length, 31.7% fiber strength, 32.6% fiber fineness, 20.8% fiber uniformity, and 34.0% fiber elongation”
e2“Field experiments were carried out”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased fiber elongation by 34.0%.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulchinge1
- Outcome
- fiber elongatione1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 34.0%e1
- Setting
- Field experimentse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Cotton is a global cash crop”
e1“Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased 40.5% gunning out turn, 30.0% fiber length, 31.7% fiber strength, 32.6% fiber fineness, 20.8% fiber uniformity, and 34.0% fiber elongation”
e2“Field experiments were carried out”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoot nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium contents were maximum where 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen and mulch was applied.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Organ / stage
- Shoote3
- Treatment
- 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen and mulche3
- Outcome
- Shoot nitrogen, phosphorous, potassiume3
- Direction
- maximume3
- Setting
- Field experimentse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Cotton is a global cash crop”
e3“Shoot nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, calcium, and magnesium contents were maximum where 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen and mulch was applied”
e2“Field experiments were carried out”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoot calcium and magnesium contents were maximum where 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen and mulch was applied.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Organ / stage
- Shoote3
- Treatment
- 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen and mulche3
- Outcome
- calcium, and magnesium contentse3
- Direction
- maximume3
- Setting
- Field experimentse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Cotton is a global cash crop”
e3“Shoot nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, calcium, and magnesium contents were maximum where 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen and mulch was applied”
e2“Field experiments were carried out”
Claim · model-written summary
Natural mulch reduced soil temperature compared with chemical and no mulch conditions.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- Natural mulche4
- Outcome
- soil temperaturee4
- Direction
- reducede4
- Comparator
- chemical and no mulch conditionse4
- Setting
- Field experimentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Cotton is a global cash crop”
e4“Natural mulch reduced the soil temperature as compared to chemical and no mulch conditions”
e2“Field experiments were carried out”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil temperature was 0.5 to 1.8 ℃ lower in mulching treatments than in the control.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- mulching treatmentse5
- Outcome
- soil temperaturee5
- Direction
- lowere5
- Value
- 0.5 to 1.8 ℃e5
- Comparator
- the controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Cotton is a global cash crop”
e5“The soil temperature was 0.5 to 1.8 ℃ lower in mulching treatments as compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum economic yield was around 90% higher with natural mulch and 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen application.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- natural mulch with the 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen applicatione6
- Outcome
- Maximum economic yielde6
- Direction
- highere6
- Value
- around 90%e6
- Setting
- Field experimentse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Cotton is a global cash crop”
e6“Maximum economic yield was around 90% higher in natural mulch with the 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen application”
e2“Field experiments were carried out”
Claim · model-written summary
Optimum nitrogen application with natural mulch enhanced plant growth and development in cotton.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- optimum nitrogen application with natural mulche7
- Outcome
- plant growth and developmente7
- Direction
- enhancede7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Cotton is a global cash crop”
e7“optimum nitrogen application with natural mulch not only enhanced plant growth and development”
Claim · model-written summary
Optimum nitrogen application with natural mulch induced sustainability in quality cotton production under semi-arid conditions.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume7 - Outcome
- sustainability in quality cotton productione7
- Direction
- inducede7
- Setting
- semi-arid conditionse7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e7“optimum nitrogen application with natural mulch not only enhanced plant growth and development but also induced sustainability in quality cotton production under semi-arid conditions”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ
64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
99 papers more in this group
See all 103 papers →mulching · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →mulching · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →mulching · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →nitrogen · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
75 papers more in this group
See all 79 papers →nitrogen · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
149 papers more in this group
See all 153 papers →nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
285 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
339 papers more in this group
See all 343 papers →mulching · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.