Paper · 2022 · Agriculture

Impacts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application and Mulching on the Morpho-Physiological and Yield-Related Traits in Cotton

Khalid Hussain; Ayesha Ilyas; Saqib Ali; et al.

13
claims
35
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cotton is a global cash crop with a significant contribution in the world economy. Optimum nutrient and water supply are most important for sustainable cotton production under warmer and dry environments. Field experiments were carried out to evaluate the cumulative impacts of various nitrogen doses and mulches on sustainable cotton production under semi-arid conditions during 2018 and 2019. Four nitrogen doses; 0, 70, 140, and 210 kg ha−1 and three types of mulch: control (without mulch), natural mulch (5 tons/ha wheat straw), and chemical mulch (methanol (30%). Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased 40.5% gunning out turn, 30.0% fiber length, 31.7% fiber strength, 32.6% fiber fineness, 20.8% fiber uniformity, and 34.0% fiber elongation. Shoot nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, calcium, and magnesium contents were maximum where 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen and mulch was applied. Natural mulch reduced the soil temperature as compared to chemical and no mulch conditions. The soil temperature was 0.5 to 1.8 ℃ lower in mulching treatments as compared to the control. Maximum economic yield was around 90% higher in natural mulch with the 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen application. It is concluded that optimum nitrogen application with natural mulch not only enhanced plant growth and development but also induced sustainability in quality cotton production under semi-arid conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased gunning out turn by 40.5%.

Treatment
Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulchinge1
Outcome
gunning out turne1
Direction
increasede1
Value
40.5%e1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton is a global cash crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased 40.5% gunning out turn, 30.0% fiber length, 31.7% fiber strength, 32.6% fiber fineness, 20.8% fiber uniformity, and 34.0% fiber elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–761 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased fiber length by 30.0%.

Treatment
Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulchinge1
Outcome
fiber lengthe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
30.0%e1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton is a global cash crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased 40.5% gunning out turn, 30.0% fiber length, 31.7% fiber strength, 32.6% fiber fineness, 20.8% fiber uniformity, and 34.0% fiber elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–761 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased fiber strength by 31.7%.

Treatment
Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulchinge1
Outcome
fiber strengthe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
31.7%e1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton is a global cash crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased 40.5% gunning out turn, 30.0% fiber length, 31.7% fiber strength, 32.6% fiber fineness, 20.8% fiber uniformity, and 34.0% fiber elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–761 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased fiber fineness by 32.6%.

Treatment
Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulchinge1
Outcome
fiber finenesse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
32.6%e1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton is a global cash crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased 40.5% gunning out turn, 30.0% fiber length, 31.7% fiber strength, 32.6% fiber fineness, 20.8% fiber uniformity, and 34.0% fiber elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–761 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased fiber uniformity by 20.8%.

Treatment
Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulchinge1
Outcome
fiber uniformitye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
20.8%e1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton is a global cash crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased 40.5% gunning out turn, 30.0% fiber length, 31.7% fiber strength, 32.6% fiber fineness, 20.8% fiber uniformity, and 34.0% fiber elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–761 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased fiber elongation by 34.0%.

Treatment
Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulchinge1
Outcome
fiber elongatione1
Direction
increasede1
Value
34.0%e1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton is a global cash crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen 210 kg ha−1 with natural mulching increased 40.5% gunning out turn, 30.0% fiber length, 31.7% fiber strength, 32.6% fiber fineness, 20.8% fiber uniformity, and 34.0% fiber elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–761 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium contents were maximum where 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen and mulch was applied.

Organ / stage
Shoote3
Treatment
210 kg ha−1 nitrogen and mulche3
Outcome
Shoot nitrogen, phosphorous, potassiume3
Direction
maximume3
Setting
Field experimentse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton is a global cash crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e3

“Shoot nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, calcium, and magnesium contents were maximum where 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen and mulch was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–896 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot calcium and magnesium contents were maximum where 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen and mulch was applied.

Organ / stage
Shoote3
Treatment
210 kg ha−1 nitrogen and mulche3
Outcome
calcium, and magnesium contentse3
Direction
maximume3
Setting
Field experimentse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton is a global cash crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e3

“Shoot nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, calcium, and magnesium contents were maximum where 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen and mulch was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–896 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural mulch reduced soil temperature compared with chemical and no mulch conditions.

Treatment
Natural mulche4
Outcome
soil temperaturee4
Direction
reducede4
Comparator
chemical and no mulch conditionse4
Setting
Field experimentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton is a global cash crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e4

“Natural mulch reduced the soil temperature as compared to chemical and no mulch conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–988 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil temperature was 0.5 to 1.8 ℃ lower in mulching treatments than in the control.

Treatment
mulching treatmentse5
Outcome
soil temperaturee5
Direction
lowere5
Value
0.5 to 1.8 ℃e5
Comparator
the controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton is a global cash crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e5

“The soil temperature was 0.5 to 1.8 ℃ lower in mulching treatments as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum economic yield was around 90% higher with natural mulch and 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen application.

Treatment
natural mulch with the 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen applicatione6
Outcome
Maximum economic yielde6
Direction
highere6
Value
around 90%e6
Setting
Field experimentse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton is a global cash crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e6

“Maximum economic yield was around 90% higher in natural mulch with the 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1188 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were carried out”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum nitrogen application with natural mulch enhanced plant growth and development in cotton.

Treatment
optimum nitrogen application with natural mulche7
Outcome
plant growth and developmente7
Direction
enhancede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton is a global cash crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e7

“optimum nitrogen application with natural mulch not only enhanced plant growth and development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1305 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum nitrogen application with natural mulch induced sustainability in quality cotton production under semi-arid conditions.

Outcome
sustainability in quality cotton productione7
Direction
inducede7
Setting
semi-arid conditionse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“optimum nitrogen application with natural mulch not only enhanced plant growth and development but also induced sustainability in quality cotton production under semi-arid conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1393 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

103 papers: 65 positive, 38 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

mulching · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

mulching · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 30 positive, 2 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

mulching · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 59 positive, 4 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 71 positive, 8 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
    Nitrate at 9 meq/liter was less effective for N accumulation relative to vegetative parts.

    Growth of Cotton Plants on Nitrate and Ammonium Nitrogen1 · 1975 · compared with lower concentrations of either source, or their combination

    Opposite direction

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 129 positive, 24 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

285 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

mulching · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.