Paper · 2023 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Tillage, residue, nitrogen and herbicides effects on weeds and greengram productivity and profitability in conservation agriculture-based maize-wheat-greengram system

Suman Sen; T.K. Das; Anchal Dass; et al.

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Conservation agriculture (CA) based intensification of maize (Zea mays L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend Fiori and Paol) system through inclusion of greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) during summer may improve productivity and promote sustainability. However, weeds are the major biotic constraint that limit productivity of short-duration greengram severely, if not controlled timely. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted during 2018-19 and 2019-20 to evaluate the residual effects of nitrogen (N) applied to the preceding crops, and the concurrent effects of tillage, residue and herbicide on weeds and greengram productivity and profitability under a maize-wheat-greengram cropping system. Four main plot treatments comprised of three zero-till (ZT) flat-bed with retention of residues (R) of greengram (in maize), maize (in wheat) and wheat (in greengram) and 50, 75 and 100% N of the recommended 150 and 120 kg N/ha applied to maize and wheat, respectively (~ZT+R+50N, ZT+R+75N, ZT+R+100N), and a conventional tillage (CT) with incorporation of these three crops residue and 100% of the recommended N to the preceding crops (~CT+R+100N). The sub-plot treatments were: ready-mix Na-acifluorfen (16.5%) + clodinafop-propargyl (8%) at 245 (165+80) g/ha applied post-emergence (PoE), pendimethalin at 1000 g/ha pre-emergence (PE) followed by (fb) imazethapyr at 75 g/ha PoE, pendimethalin at 1000 g/ha PE fb spot hand weeding (HW) at 25 days after sowing (DAS), and unweeded control (UWC). Results indicated that ZT with residue retention (ZT+R), irrespective of previous season N applications led to significant reduction in weed interference compared to CT+R+100N and gave better greengram plant growth, rhizobial symbiosis, yields and profitability over CT+R+100N. Among weed management treatments, sequential application of pendimethalin fb imazethapyr was comparable with ready-mix Na-acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyl, but led to better weed suppression, and higher greengram growth, yields and net income. Thus, summer greengram in a CA based maize-wheat system with appropriate weed control employing herbicides may be a promising strategy for sustainable crop intensification in north-western Indo-Gangetic Plains of India.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with residue retention significantly reduced weed interference in greengram compared with conventional tillage with residue incorporation and 100% N, irrespective of previous-season N.

Treatment
ZT with residue retention (ZT+R)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed interferencee0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
CT+R+100Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZT with residue retention (ZT+R), irrespective of previous season N applications led to significant reduction in weed interference compared to CT+R+100N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1679 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with residue retention gave better greengram plant growth and rhizobial symbiosis than conventional tillage with residue incorporation and 100% N.

Treatment
ZT with residue retention (ZT+R)e0
Interactor
rhizobiale0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth, rhizobial symbiosise0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
CT+R+100Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZT with residue retention (ZT+R), irrespective of previous season N applications led to significant reduction in weed interference compared to CT+R+100N and gave better greengram plant growth, rhizobial symbiosis, yields and profitability over CT+R+100N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with residue retention gave better greengram yields and profitability than conventional tillage with residue incorporation and 100% N.

Treatment
ZT with residue retention (ZT+R)e0
Outcome
yields and profitabilitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
CT+R+100Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZT with residue retention (ZT+R), irrespective of previous season N applications led to significant reduction in weed interference compared to CT+R+100N and gave better greengram plant growth, rhizobial symbiosis, yields and profitability over CT+R+100N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential pendimethalin followed by imazethapyr was comparable with the ready-mix Na-acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyl among weed management treatments in greengram.

Treatment
sequential application of pendimethalin fb imazethapyre0
Outcome
comparablee0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
ready-mix Na-acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sequential application of pendimethalin fb imazethapyr was comparable with ready-mix Na-acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–1938 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential pendimethalin followed by imazethapyr gave better weed suppression than the ready-mix Na-acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyl.

Treatment
sequential application of pendimethalin fb imazethapyre0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed suppressione0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
ready-mix Na-acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sequential application of pendimethalin fb imazethapyr was comparable with ready-mix Na-acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyl, but led to better weed suppression, and higher greengram growth, yields and net income”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–2026 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential pendimethalin followed by imazethapyr gave higher greengram growth, yields and net income than the ready-mix Na-acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyl.

Treatment
sequential application of pendimethalin fb imazethapyre0
Outcome
growth, yields and net incomee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ready-mix Na-acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sequential application of pendimethalin fb imazethapyr was comparable with ready-mix Na-acifluorfen + clodinafop-propargyl, but led to better weed suppression, and higher greengram growth, yields and net income”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–2026 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that summer greengram in a CA-based maize-wheat system with appropriate herbicide weed control may be a promising strategy for sustainable crop intensification.

Outcome
promising strategy for sustainable crop intensificatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“summer greengram in a CA based maize-wheat system with appropriate weed control employing herbicides may be a promising strategy for sustainable crop intensification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2034–2199 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

50 papers: 49 positive, 1 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 45 positive, 1 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 46 positive, 6 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

40 papers: 40 positive, 0 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

organic · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

tillage · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

organic · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

tillage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 67 positive, 14 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.