Paper · 2020 · Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences

Herbicidal management in monsoon green gram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) and its effect on the following rapeseed (Brassica campestris L. var. Yellow Sarson) in the Indo-Gangetic plains of Eastern India

Srijani Maji; Md. Hasim Reja; Rajib Nath; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Weeds, if not timely controlled, severely limit productivity of short-duration monsoon green gram. The aim of the present study was to identify a sustainable herbicidal management strategy in green gram-rapeseed rotation. Efficiency, phytotoxic effects in greengram and follow-up crop (rapeseed), yield, and economics of pre-emergence Pendimethalin and Pendimethalin + Imazethapyr and post-emergence [20 days after sowing (DAS)] Imazethapyr, Imazamox + Imazethapyr, and Acifluorfen sodium + Clodinafop propargyl were compared. Ready-mixes of two herbicide molecules were used. Among the herbicides, green gram treated with Imazamox + Imazethapyr (60 g a.i. ha−1) and Acifluorfen sodium + Clodinafop propargyl (187.5 g a.i. ha−1) showed significantly higher weed control efficiency of 81.3–85.1% and 90.5–92.9% on 30 and 55 DAS, respectively. In spite of initial herbicide induced oxidative stress and phytotoxicity, the crop treated with above-mentioned ready-mixes resumed normal growth within 15 days of herbicide application. They also recorded improvement in yields and net returns by 44.0–47.2% and 145.0–153.0%, respectively over weedy check. Detrimental residual effects on germination and yield were not observed in following rapeseed crop. These herbicide ready-mixes may be a promising weed management strategy for the monsoon green gram grown in the uplands of rice-dominated Indo-Gangetic plains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazamox + Imazethapyr (60 g a.i. ha−1) significantly increased green gram weed control efficiency to 81.3–85.1%.

Organ / stage
30 and 55 DASe0
Treatment
Imazamox + Imazethapyr (60 g a.i. ha−1)e0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
81.3–85.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green gram treated with Imazamox + Imazethapyr (60 g a.i. ha−1) and Acifluorfen sodium + Clodinafop propargyl (187.5 g a.i. ha−1) showed significantly higher weed control efficiency of 81.3–85.1% and 90.5–92.9% on 30 and 55 DAS, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acifluorfen sodium + Clodinafop propargyl (187.5 g a.i. ha−1) significantly increased green gram weed control efficiency to 90.5–92.9%.

Organ / stage
30 and 55 DASe0
Treatment
Acifluorfen sodium + Clodinafop propargyl (187.5 g a.i. ha−1)e0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
90.5–92.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green gram treated with Imazamox + Imazethapyr (60 g a.i. ha−1) and Acifluorfen sodium + Clodinafop propargyl (187.5 g a.i. ha−1) showed significantly higher weed control efficiency of 81.3–85.1% and 90.5–92.9% on 30 and 55 DAS, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green gram exposed to the ready-mix herbicides initially had oxidative stress and phytotoxicity.

Taxon
Vigna radiata (L.) WilczekVigna radiatat0
Treatment
herbicidee0
Outcome
oxidative stress and phytotoxicitye0
Qualifier
initiale0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In spite of initial herbicide induced oxidative stress and phytotoxicity, the crop treated with above-mentioned ready-mixes resumed normal growth within 15 days of herbicide application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green gram treated with the ready-mix herbicides resumed normal growth within 15 days.

Taxon
Vigna radiata (L.) WilczekVigna radiatat0
Treatment
ready-mixese0
Outcome
resumed normal growthe0
Value
within 15 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In spite of initial herbicide induced oxidative stress and phytotoxicity, the crop treated with above-mentioned ready-mixes resumed normal growth within 15 days of herbicide application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ready-mix herbicides improved green gram yields by 44.0–47.2% over the weedy check.

Taxon
Vigna radiata (L.) WilczekVigna radiatat0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
44.0–47.2%e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They also recorded improvement in yields and net returns by 44.0–47.2% and 145.0–153.0%, respectively over weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ready-mix herbicides improved green gram net returns by 145.0–153.0% over the weedy check.

Taxon
Vigna radiata (L.) WilczekVigna radiatat0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
145.0–153.0%e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They also recorded improvement in yields and net returns by 44.0–47.2% and 145.0–153.0%, respectively over weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide residues showed no detrimental effect on following rapeseed germination.

Taxon
Brassica campestris L. var. Yellow SarsonBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferat0
Treatment
residual effectse0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
not observede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera
Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Detrimental residual effects on germination and yield were not observed in following rapeseed crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1248 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica campestris L. var. Yellow Sarson”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide residues showed no detrimental effect on following rapeseed yield.

Taxon
Brassica campestris L. var. Yellow SarsonBrassica rapa subsp. oleiferat0
Treatment
residual effectse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not observede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera
Brassica rapa subsp. oleifera · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Detrimental residual effects on germination and yield were not observed in following rapeseed crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1248 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica campestris L. var. Yellow Sarson”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–156 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose the ready-mix herbicides for weed management in monsoon green gram in the Indo-Gangetic uplands.

Treatment
herbicide ready-mixese0
Outcome
weed management strategye0
Qualifier
may be a promisinge0
Setting
Indo-Gangetic plainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These herbicide ready-mixes may be a promising weed management strategy for the monsoon green gram grown in the uplands of rice-dominated Indo-Gangetic plains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1408 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

50 papers: 49 positive, 1 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

sodium atom · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

acifluorfen · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

clodinafop-propargyl · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

imazamox · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.