Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Effect of Tillage and Weed Management Practices on Growth and Yield of Green Gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]

S. Indra; Anitrosa Innazent; P. A. Joseph; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2023 at Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, to find out the effect of different tillage management [Minimum tillage (primary tillage only) and Conventional tillage (primary and secondary tillage)] and five weed control treatments [(PE Pendimethalin @ 1.0 kg ha-1, PE Pendimethalin + Imazethapyr (pre-mix) - Valor 32% EC 1.0 kg ha-1, Hand weeding on 15 and 30 DAS, Weed free plot and Un weeded control (weedy check)] on weeds and productivity of green gram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) during the winter (Rabi). Conventional tillage generally led to taller plants and higher leaf counts compared to minimum tillage, while effective weed management practices, particularly the combination of Pendimethalin and Imazethapyr, resulted in superior growth indices. Additionally, conventional tillage and weed-free conditions significantly enhanced dry matter production and yield parameters of green gram.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave taller green gram plants than minimum tillage.

Treatment
Conventional tillagee0
Outcome
taller plantse0
Direction
tallere0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage generally led to taller plants and higher leaf counts compared to minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave higher green gram leaf counts than minimum tillage.

Treatment
Conventional tillagee0
Outcome
leaf countse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage generally led to taller plants and higher leaf counts compared to minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin with Imazethapyr gave superior green gram growth indices.

Treatment
combination of Pendimethalin and Imazethapyre0
Outcome
growth indicese0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effective weed management practices, particularly the combination of Pendimethalin and Imazethapyr, resulted in superior growth indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–830 · show in text ↑
t0

“Green Gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage significantly enhanced green gram dry matter production and yield parameters.

Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
dry matter production and yield parameterse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage and weed-free conditions significantly enhanced dry matter production and yield parameters of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free conditions significantly enhanced green gram dry matter production and yield parameters.

Treatment
weed-free conditionse0
Outcome
dry matter production and yield parameterse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage and weed-free conditions significantly enhanced dry matter production and yield parameters of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–971 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Imazethapyr · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

tillage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 67 positive, 14 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

herbicide · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 103 positive, 6 negative or no effect

102 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.