Paper · 2023 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

The Impact of Tillage Systems and Herbicide Type on the Growth and Yield of Wheat and the Growth Parameters of Associated Weeds

Hussain A. Safi; Marwan N. Ramadhan

20
claims
80
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The investigation was placed in the Al-Ghamij region, which is located north of Basrah in Iraq, in silty-clay soil. Three tillage systems were used in the study: conventional tillage with a moldboard plow, reduced-tillage with a disc harrow, and the no-till system. Additionally, three herbicides were used: Chevalier (300 g ha -1 ), Granstar (15-20 g ha -1 ), and Topic (0.75 l ha -1 ) to control weed growth. According to the RCBD design, using split plots, with the main plots devoted to tillage techniques and the split plots to herbicide. The results showed the significant superiority of the reduced-tillage system by the disc harrow, with the fewest weeds per square meter, the fewest weeds dry weight per square meter, the tallest plants, the most tillers per square meter, the most spikes per square meter, the most grain yield, and the most biological yield totaling (48.7 plants m -2 , 3.82g m -2 , 81.67 cm, 370.78 tiller m -2 , 344.4 spike m -2 ,4519.00 kg ha -1 , and 10340.00 kg ha -1 ), compared to no-till and reduced-tillage methods, conventional tillage using a moldboard plow resulted in the highest number of weeds, the highest dry weight of the weeds, the shortest plant, the fewest tillers per square meter, the fewest spikes per square meter, the smallest grain and biological yield (105.3 plants m -2 , 10.20 g m -2 , 78.33 cm, 310.22 tiller m -2 , 264.9 spike m -2 , 3296.00 kg ha -1 , and 9985.00 kg ha -1 ). The results of the study demonstrated the significant superiority of the Chevalier herbicide as it exhibited lower dry weight of weeds per square meter, the highest plant, more tillers and spikes per square meter, and the highest biological yield (4.49 g m -2 , 82.33 cm, 347.89 tiller m -2 , 309.7 spike m -2 and 10301.00 kg ha -1 ) respectively,. On the other hand, the Topic herbicide displayed the highest weeds dry weight, shortest plants, the lowest number of tillers and spikes, and the lowest biological yield (8.87 g m -2 , 78.00 cm, 326.11 tiller m -2 , 297.7 spike m -2 and 10023.00 kg ha -1 ).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage with a disc harrow gave the fewest weeds per square meter (48.7 plants m-2).

Treatment
the reduced-tillage system by the disc harrowe0
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
weeds per square metere1
Direction
feweste1
Value
48.7 plants m -2e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reduced-tillage system by the disc harrow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–648 · show in text ↑
e1

“the fewest weeds per square meter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–688 · show in text ↑
e2

“48.7 plants m -2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage with a disc harrow gave the lowest weed dry weight per square meter (3.82 g m-2).

Treatment
the reduced-tillage system by the disc harrowe0
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
weeds dry weight per square metere1
Direction
feweste1
Value
3.82g m -2e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reduced-tillage system by the disc harrow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–648 · show in text ↑
e1

“the fewest weeds dry weight per square meter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–734 · show in text ↑
e2

“3.82g m -2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage with a disc harrow gave the tallest wheat plants (81.67 cm).

Treatment
the reduced-tillage system by the disc harrowe0
Outcome
plantse1
Direction
talleste1
Value
81.67 cme2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reduced-tillage system by the disc harrow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–648 · show in text ↑
e1

“the tallest plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–754 · show in text ↑
e2

“81.67 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage with a disc harrow gave the most tillers (370.78 per m2) and spikes (344.4 per m2).

Treatment
the reduced-tillage system by the disc harrowe0
Outcome
tillers per square meter, the most spikes per square metere1
Direction
moste1
Value
370.78 tiller m -2 , 344.4 spike m -2e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reduced-tillage system by the disc harrow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–648 · show in text ↑
e1

“the most tillers per square meter, the most spikes per square meter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–823 · show in text ↑
e2

“370.78 tiller m -2 , 344.4 spike m -2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage with a disc harrow gave the highest grain yield (4519.00 kg ha-1).

Treatment
the reduced-tillage system by the disc harrowe0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
moste1
Value
4519.00 kg ha -1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reduced-tillage system by the disc harrow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–648 · show in text ↑
e1

“the most grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–845 · show in text ↑
e2

“4519.00 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage with a disc harrow gave the highest biological yield (10340.00 kg ha-1).

Treatment
the reduced-tillage system by the disc harrowe0
Outcome
biological yielde1
Direction
moste1
Value
10340.00 kg ha -1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reduced-tillage system by the disc harrow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–648 · show in text ↑
e1

“the most biological yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–876 · show in text ↑
e2

“10340.00 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional moldboard-plow tillage gave the highest number of weeds (105.3 plants m-2).

Treatment
conventional tillage using a moldboard plowe0
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
number of weedse1
Direction
higheste1
Value
105.3 plants m -2e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage using a moldboard plow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1104 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest number of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1144 · show in text ↑
e2

“105.3 plants m -2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional moldboard-plow tillage gave the highest weed dry weight (10.20 g m-2).

Treatment
conventional tillage using a moldboard plowe0
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
dry weight of the weedse1
Direction
higheste1
Value
10.20 g m -2e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage using a moldboard plow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1104 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest dry weight of the weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1181 · show in text ↑
e2

“10.20 g m -2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1349 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional moldboard-plow tillage gave the shortest wheat plants (78.33 cm).

Treatment
conventional tillage using a moldboard plowe0
Outcome
plante1
Direction
shorteste1
Value
78.33 cme2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage using a moldboard plow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1104 · show in text ↑
e1

“the shortest plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1201 · show in text ↑
e2

“78.33 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1360 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional moldboard-plow tillage gave the fewest tillers (310.22 per m2) and spikes (264.9 per m2).

Treatment
conventional tillage using a moldboard plowe0
Outcome
tillers per square meter, the fewest spikes per square metere1
Direction
feweste1
Value
310.22 tiller m -2 , 264.9 spike m -2e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage using a moldboard plow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1104 · show in text ↑
e1

“the fewest tillers per square meter, the fewest spikes per square meter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1274 · show in text ↑
e2

“310.22 tiller m -2 , 264.9 spike m -2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional moldboard-plow tillage gave the smallest grain yield (3296.00 kg ha-1).

Treatment
conventional tillage using a moldboard plowe0
Outcome
graine1
Direction
smalleste1
Value
3296.00 kg ha -1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage using a moldboard plow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1104 · show in text ↑
e1

“the smallest grain and biological yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1315 · show in text ↑
e2

“3296.00 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1418 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional moldboard-plow tillage gave the smallest biological yield (9985.00 kg ha-1).

Treatment
conventional tillage using a moldboard plowe0
Outcome
biological yielde1
Direction
smalleste1
Value
9985.00 kg ha -1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage using a moldboard plow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1104 · show in text ↑
e1

“the smallest grain and biological yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1315 · show in text ↑
e2

“9985.00 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1441 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The Chevalier herbicide gave lower weed dry weight (4.49 g m-2).

Treatment
the Chevalier herbicidee0
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
dry weight of weeds per square metere1
Direction
lowere1
Value
4.49 g m -2e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Chevalier herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1537 · show in text ↑
e1

“lower dry weight of weeds per square meter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1596 · show in text ↑
e2

“4.49 g m -2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1704 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The Chevalier herbicide gave the tallest wheat plants (82.33 cm).

Treatment
the Chevalier herbicidee0
Outcome
plante1
Direction
higheste1
Value
82.33 cme2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Chevalier herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1537 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1615 · show in text ↑
e2

“82.33 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1707–1715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The Chevalier herbicide gave more tillers (347.89 per m2) and spikes (309.7 per m2).

Treatment
the Chevalier herbicidee0
Outcome
tillers and spikes per square metere1
Direction
moree1
Value
347.89 tiller m -2 , 309.7 spike m -2e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Chevalier herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1537 · show in text ↑
e1

“more tillers and spikes per square meter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1657 · show in text ↑
e2

“347.89 tiller m -2 , 309.7 spike m -2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–1754 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The Chevalier herbicide gave the highest biological yield (10301.00 kg ha-1).

Treatment
the Chevalier herbicidee0
Outcome
biological yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
10301.00 kg ha -1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Chevalier herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1537 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest biological yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1691 · show in text ↑
e2

“10301.00 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1776 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The Topic herbicide gave the highest weed dry weight (8.87 g m-2).

Treatment
the Topic herbicidee0
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
weeds dry weighte1
Direction
higheste1
Value
8.87 g m -2e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Topic herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1813–1832 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest weeds dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1843–1871 · show in text ↑
e2

“8.87 g m -2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1964–1975 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The Topic herbicide gave the shortest wheat plants (78.00 cm).

Treatment
the Topic herbicidee0
Outcome
plantse1
Direction
shorteste1
Value
78.00 cme2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Topic herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1813–1832 · show in text ↑
e1

“shortest plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–1888 · show in text ↑
e2

“78.00 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1978–1986 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The Topic herbicide gave the lowest numbers of tillers (326.11 per m2) and spikes (297.7 per m2).

Treatment
the Topic herbicidee0
Outcome
number of tillers and spikese1
Direction
loweste1
Value
326.11 tiller m -2 , 297.7 spike m -2e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Topic herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1813–1832 · show in text ↑
e1

“the lowest number of tillers and spikes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1890–1929 · show in text ↑
e2

“326.11 tiller m -2 , 297.7 spike m -2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1988–2025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The Topic herbicide gave the lowest biological yield (10023.00 kg ha-1).

Treatment
the Topic herbicidee0
Outcome
biological yielde1
Direction
loweste1
Value
10023.00 kg ha -1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Topic herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1813–1832 · show in text ↑
e1

“the lowest biological yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1935–1962 · show in text ↑
e2

“10023.00 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2030–2047 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑

(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 18 positive, 9 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

tillage · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

183 papers: 126 positive, 57 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

179 papers more in this group

See all 183 papers →

herbicide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 64 positive, 52 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 208 positive, 59 negative or no effect

207 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.