Abstract
An investigation was carried out at Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agriculture Science and Technology of Jammu during 2013-14 and 2014-15, to assess the influence of 4 tillage systems and 3 weed-control practices on weed dynamics and productivity in maize-wheat cropping sequence. In maize, grain yield of maize was statistically at par in continuous conventional tillage (CT-CT) in both maize and wheat and conventional tillage in maize and zero tillage in wheat (CT-ZT). Different tillage treatments did not influence on weed density, weed biomass, plant growth characters, grain and straw yields of wheat in maize-wheat cropping sequence. Amongst the weed-control practices, 2 hand weedings which was at par with atrazine (1 kg/ha) in maize and metribuzin (200 g/ha) at par with two hand weedings in wheat which was significantly reduced weed density, weed biomass and recorded significantly higher maize and wheat grain and straw yields than weedy check.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Maize grain yield was statistically at par under CT-CT and CT-ZT.
- Treatment
- continuous conventional tillage (CT-CT)e0
- Outcome
- grain yield of maizee0
- Direction
- statistically at pare0
- Comparator
- conventional tillage in maize and zero tillage in wheat (CT-ZT)e0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Maize (Zea mays)-Wheat (Triticum aestivum) System”
e0“grain yield of maize was statistically at par in continuous conventional tillage (CT-CT) in both maize and wheat and conventional tillage in maize and zero tillage in wheat (CT-ZT)”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage treatments did not influence wheat weed density or biomass.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Different tillage treatmentse0
- Outcome
- weed density, weed biomasse0
- Direction
- did not influencee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Maize (Zea mays)-Wheat (Triticum aestivum) System”
e0“Different tillage treatments did not influence on weed density, weed biomass, plant growth characters, grain and straw yields of wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage treatments did not influence wheat growth or grain and straw yields.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Different tillage treatmentse0
- Outcome
- plant growth characters, grain and straw yields of wheate0
- Direction
- did not influencee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Maize (Zea mays)-Wheat (Triticum aestivum) System”
e0“Different tillage treatments did not influence on weed density, weed biomass, plant growth characters, grain and straw yields of wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Two hand weedings in maize significantly reduced weed density and biomass relative to a weedy check.
- Treatment
- 2 hand weedingse0
- Outcome
- weed density, weed biomasse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Maize (Zea mays)-Wheat (Triticum aestivum) System”
e0“2 hand weedings which was at par with atrazine (1 kg/ha) in maize and metribuzin (200 g/ha) at par with two hand weedings in wheat which was significantly reduced weed density, weed biomass and recorded significantly higher maize and wheat grain and straw yields than weedy check”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed control produced significantly higher maize grain and straw yields than the weedy check.
- Treatment
- 2 hand weedingse0
- Outcome
- maize and wheat grain and straw yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Maize (Zea mays)-Wheat (Triticum aestivum) System”
e0“2 hand weedings which was at par with atrazine (1 kg/ha) in maize and metribuzin (200 g/ha) at par with two hand weedings in wheat which was significantly reduced weed density, weed biomass and recorded significantly higher maize and wheat grain and straw yields than weedy check”
Claim · model-written summary
Metribuzin and hand weedings in wheat were at par.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- metribuzin (200 g/ha)e0
- Outcome
- at pare0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Comparator
- two hand weedingse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Maize (Zea mays)-Wheat (Triticum aestivum) System”
e0“metribuzin (200 g/ha) at par with two hand weedings in wheat”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 126 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
179 papers more in this group
See all 183 papers →tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1,410 papers more in this group
See all 1,414 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.