Paper · 2023 · Environment and Ecology

Management of Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi.) Goid. Causing Leaf Blight Disease in Mung Bean in Maharashtra State

Pravin Babasaheb Khaire; Dilipkumar Gangadhar Hingole; Somnath Kadappa Holkar; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Leaf blight (LB) disease caused by Macrophomina phaseolina, an important constraint in mung bean production in India. In the present investigations, the aimed to evaluate the loss in yield, better mung bean cultivars against LB and the efficient management. Based on symptomatology, cultural and morphological characteristics the pathogen isolated from cv JL-781 it was identified as M. phaseolina (Tassi.) Goid. inducing LB disease. Pathogenicity of M. phaseolina was proved on the mung bean cv JL-781. Subsequently, field experiment was conducted for the management of LB disease using seed treatment with carbendazim 50 WP a.i. 0.2% (2 g/kg) + spraying of zinc sulphate monohydrate @ 0.01% + soil application of Trichoderma viride @ 5 g/ha mixed with 3 kg of FYM + foliar spray of garlic extract (10%) showed 15.45% incidence. This result was followed by 16.79% disease incidence and 15.44% disease severity by seed treatment with carbendazim, foliar spray of zinc sulphate, and soil application with T. viride @ 5 g/ha mixed with 3 kg of FYM.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The isolate from JL-781 was identified as M. phaseolina.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Material
JL-781e0
Interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
identified as M. phaseolinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the pathogen isolated from cv JL-781 it was identified as M. phaseolina (Tassi.) Goid. inducing LB disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–432 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. phaseolina was pathogenic on mung bean JL-781.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Material
JL-781e0
Interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
Pathogenicitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pathogenicity of M. phaseolina was proved on the mung bean cv JL-781”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined seed, spray and soil treatment resulted in 15.45% leaf blight incidence.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
seed treatment with carbendazim 50 WP a.i. 0.2% (2 g/kg) + spraying of zinc sulphate monohydrate @ 0.01% + soil application of Trichoderma viride @ 5 g/ha mixed with 3 kg of FYM + foliar spray of garlic extract (10%)e0
Interactor
Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae1pathogent0
Second interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incidencee0
Value
15.45%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · Second interactorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with carbendazim 50 WP a.i. 0.2% (2 g/kg) + spraying of zinc sulphate monohydrate @ 0.01% + soil application of Trichoderma viride @ 5 g/ha mixed with 3 kg of FYM + foliar spray of garlic extract (10%) showed 15.45% incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“Macrophomina phaseolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second treatment produced 16.79% disease incidence.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
seed treatment with carbendazim, foliar spray of zinc sulphate, and soil application with T. viride @ 5 g/ha mixed with 3 kg of FYMe0
Interactor
Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae1pathogent0
Second interactor
T. virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Value
16.79%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · Second interactorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“16.79% disease incidence and 15.44% disease severity by seed treatment with carbendazim, foliar spray of zinc sulphate, and soil application with T. viride @ 5 g/ha mixed with 3 kg of FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“Macrophomina phaseolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second treatment produced 15.44% disease severity.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
seed treatment with carbendazim, foliar spray of zinc sulphate, and soil application with T. viride @ 5 g/ha mixed with 3 kg of FYMe0
Interactor
Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae1pathogent0
Second interactor
T. virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease severitye0
Value
15.44%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · Second interactorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“16.79% disease incidence and 15.44% disease severity by seed treatment with carbendazim, foliar spray of zinc sulphate, and soil application with T. viride @ 5 g/ha mixed with 3 kg of FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“Macrophomina phaseolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–58 · show in text ↑

Allium sativum · Macrophomina phaseolina · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichoderma viride · Macrophomina phaseolina · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc sulfate · Macrophomina phaseolina · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

carbendazim · Macrophomina phaseolina · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · Macrophomina phaseolina · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · Macrophomina phaseolina · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · Macrophomina phaseolina · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

botanical · Macrophomina phaseolina · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.