Abstract
The potential of soil amendaments, bioagents and biofertilizers was evaluated for management of root rot caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Rhizoctonia bataticola). Bioagents and biofertilizers i.e.Trichoderma harzianum, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and Rhizobium phaseoli exhibited significant inhibition of Rhizoctonia bataticola. Maximum inhibition was achieved by Trichoderma harzianum i.e. 80.5%. Compatibility amongst bioagents and biofertilizers were tested in vitro. Amongst them Trichoderma harzianum and Rhizobium phaseoli were found compatible to each other. In green house, seed treatment with the bioagents and biofertilizers and also application of soil amendments recorded good number of nodules. Application of FYM and seed treatment with R. phaseoli at 25 g/kg + P. fluorescens at 10 g/kg recorded maximum number of nodules (15.3). Different seed treatments with soil amendments were used for controlling root rot incidence. Among them (T6) FYM with seed treatment of T. harzianum 4 g/kg seed + PSB at 25 g/kg seed recorded the lowest root rot incidence (26.0%) followed by (T3) R. phaseoli at 25 g/kg seed + P. fluorescens at 10 g/kg seed which recorded 32.0% root rot incidence whereas, maximum incidence of the disease was recorded in the control (83.3%).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Trichoderma harzianum significantly inhibited Rhizoctonia bataticola.
- Taxon
- greengram
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Interactor
- Rhizoctonia bataticola
Macrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen - Second interactor
- Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- inhibition of Rhizoctonia bataticolae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“root rot in greengram”
e0“Trichoderma harzianum, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and Rhizobium phaseoli exhibited significant inhibition of Rhizoctonia bataticola”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas fluorescens significantly inhibited Rhizoctonia bataticola.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia bataticolaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- Pseudomonas fluorescens
.JPG?width=60)
Pseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- inhibition of Rhizoctonia bataticolae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.JPG?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“root rot in greengram”
e0“Trichoderma harzianum, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and Rhizobium phaseoli exhibited significant inhibition of Rhizoctonia bataticola”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphate solubilizing bacteria significantly inhibited Rhizoctonia bataticola.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia bataticolaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- Phosphate solubilizing bacteriae0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- inhibition of Rhizoctonia bataticolae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“root rot in greengram”
e0“Trichoderma harzianum, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and Rhizobium phaseoli exhibited significant inhibition of Rhizoctonia bataticola”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium phaseoli significantly inhibited Rhizoctonia bataticola.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia bataticolaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- Rhizobium phaseoliRhizobium phaseolie0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- inhibition of Rhizoctonia bataticolae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“root rot in greengram”
e0“Trichoderma harzianum, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and Rhizobium phaseoli exhibited significant inhibition of Rhizoctonia bataticola”
Claim · model-written summary
Trichoderma harzianum achieved maximum pathogen inhibition of 80.5%.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia bataticolaMacrophomina phaseolinae1pathogen
- Second interactor
- Trichoderma harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- inhibitione0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 80.5%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“root rot in greengram”
e0“Maximum inhibition was achieved by Trichoderma harzianum i.e. 80.5%”
e1“root rot caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Rhizoctonia bataticola)”
Claim · model-written summary
Trichoderma harzianum and Rhizobium phaseoli were compatible in vitro.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Interactor
- Trichoderma harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
- Second interactor
- Rhizobium phaseoliRhizobium phaseolie0symbiont
- Outcome
- compatible to each othere0
- Setting
- in vitroe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“root rot in greengram”
e0“Trichoderma harzianum and Rhizobium phaseoli were found compatible to each other”
e1“Compatibility amongst bioagents and biofertilizers were tested in vitro”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed bioagents and biofertilizers with soil amendments produced good numbers of nodules in greenhouse greengram.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- seed treatment with the bioagents and biofertilizers and also application of soil amendmentse0
- Outcome
- number of nodulese0
- Direction
- goode0
- Setting
- green housee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“root rot in greengram”
e0“In green house, seed treatment with the bioagents and biofertilizers and also application of soil amendments recorded good number of nodules”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM with R. phaseoli and P. fluorescens gave the maximum nodule number of 15.3.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- Application of FYM and seed treatment with R. phaseoli at 25 g/kg + P. fluorescens at 10 g/kge0
- Interactor
- R. phaseoliRhizobium phaseolie0symbiont
- Second interactor
- P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- number of nodulese0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 15.3e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“root rot in greengram”
e0“Application of FYM and seed treatment with R. phaseoli at 25 g/kg + P. fluorescens at 10 g/kg recorded maximum number of nodules (15.3)”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM with T. harzianum and PSB yielded the lowest root rot incidence, 26.0%, against 83.3% in controls.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- FYM with seed treatment of T. harzianum 4 g/kg seed + PSB at 25 g/kg seede0
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia bataticolaMacrophomina phaseolinae2pathogen
- Second interactor
- T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- root rot incidencee0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 26.0%e0
- Qualifier
- 83.3%e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“root rot in greengram”
e0“(T6) FYM with seed treatment of T. harzianum 4 g/kg seed + PSB at 25 g/kg seed recorded the lowest root rot incidence (26.0%)”
e1“maximum incidence of the disease was recorded in the control (83.3%)”
e2“root rot caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Rhizoctonia bataticola)”
Claim · model-written summary
R. phaseoli plus P. fluorescens produced 32.0% root rot incidence against 83.3% in controls.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatat0
- Treatment
- R. phaseoli at 25 g/kg seed + P. fluorescens at 10 g/kg seede0
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia bataticolaMacrophomina phaseolinae2pathogen
- Second interactor
- P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- root rot incidencee0
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede0
- Value
- 32.0%e0
- Qualifier
- 83.3%e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“root rot in greengram”
e0“R. phaseoli at 25 g/kg seed + P. fluorescens at 10 g/kg seed which recorded 32.0% root rot incidence”
e1“maximum incidence of the disease was recorded in the control (83.3%)”
e2“root rot caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Rhizoctonia bataticola)”
The same questions in other papers
Pseudomonas fluorescens · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Macrophomina phaseolina · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Rhizobium phaseoli · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Trichoderma harzianum · Macrophomina phaseolina · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ
78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →seed treatment · Macrophomina phaseolina · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →fertilization · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
65 papers more in this group
See all 69 papers →biocontrol · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.