Abstract
A field experiment was conducted in the rabi season of 2022-2023 at Central Research Farm (CRF), SHUATS, Uttar Pradesh, India. The experiment was laid in Randomized Block Design with eight treatments each replicated thrice viz.,(T1)Indoxacarb14.5%SC, (T2) Spinosad 45% SC, (T3),Beauveria bassiana 1x108(T4), Neem oil 2% (T5) Emamectin benzoate 5% SG ,(T6) Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC, (T7) Bacillus thuringiensis and (T8) control plot . The data on the larval population of Helicoverpa armigera after first and second spray revealed that all the treatments were significantly superior over the control. Among all the treatments,the plot treated with (T6) chlorantraniliprole18.5%SC (1.122) recorded minimum larval population followed by (T2) Spinosad 45%SC (1.289) (T1) Indoxacarb (1.467), (T4) Emamectin benzoate (1.645) and (T7) Bacillus thuringiensis 1x108CFU (1.822),(T3) Beauveria bassiana (1.989) In this the maximum larval population was recorded in (T5) Neem oil (2.134). Among all treatments with pod borer infestation respectively. While, the highest yield (16.9q/ha) was obtained from the treatment Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC as well as B:C ratio (1:4.13) obtained high from this treatment. It was followed by Spinosad 45%SC (1:3.99), Indoxacarb14.5SC (1:3:94), Neem oil 2% (1:3.52), Emamectin benzoate (1:3.59),Bacillus thuringiensis 4% WSP (1:3.39), Beauveria bassiana 1.15% WP (1:3.18) as compared to control plot (1:1:19).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 17
Claim · model-written summary
All treatments significantly reduced the larval population of Helicoverpa armigera compared with the control.
- Taxon
- Greengram
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiata var. radiatat1 - Treatment
- Bio-Pesticides and Chemicalst0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=60)
Helicoverpa armigerae1pest - Outcome
- larval populatione1
- Direction
- superiore1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“The data on the larval population of Helicoverpa armigera after first and second spray revealed that all the treatments were significantly superior over the control”
t0“Efficacy of Bio-Pesticides and Chemicals”
t1“on Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC recorded the minimum larval population.
- Taxon
- GreengramVigna radiata var. radiatat1
- Treatment
- chlorantraniliprole18.5%SCe1
- Outcome
- larval populatione1
- Direction
- minimume1
- Value
- 1.122e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“chlorantraniliprole18.5%SC (1.122) recorded minimum larval population”
t1“on Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad 45% SC was followed by a larval population of 1.289.
- Taxon
- GreengramVigna radiata var. radiatat1
- Treatment
- Spinosad 45%SCe1
- Outcome
- larval populatione1
- Direction
- followed bye1
- Value
- 1.289e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“recorded minimum larval population followed by (T2) Spinosad 45%SC (1.289) (T1) Indoxacarb (1.467), (T4) Emamectin benzoate (1.645) and (T7) Bacillus thuringiensis 1x108CFU (1.822),(T3) Beauveria bassiana (1.989)”
t1“on Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb was followed by a larval population of 1.467.
- Taxon
- GreengramVigna radiata var. radiatat1
- Treatment
- Indoxacarbe1
- Outcome
- larval populatione1
- Direction
- followed bye1
- Value
- 1.467e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“recorded minimum larval population followed by (T2) Spinosad 45%SC (1.289) (T1) Indoxacarb (1.467), (T4) Emamectin benzoate (1.645) and (T7) Bacillus thuringiensis 1x108CFU (1.822),(T3) Beauveria bassiana (1.989)”
t1“on Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate was followed by a larval population of 1.645.
- Taxon
- GreengramVigna radiata var. radiatat1
- Treatment
- Emamectin benzoatee1
- Outcome
- larval populatione1
- Direction
- followed bye1
- Value
- 1.645e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“recorded minimum larval population followed by (T2) Spinosad 45%SC (1.289) (T1) Indoxacarb (1.467), (T4) Emamectin benzoate (1.645) and (T7) Bacillus thuringiensis 1x108CFU (1.822),(T3) Beauveria bassiana (1.989)”
t1“on Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacillus thuringiensis 1x108 CFU was followed by a larval population of 1.822.
- Taxon
- GreengramVigna radiata var. radiatat1
- Treatment
- Bacillus thuringiensis 1x108CFUe1
- Outcome
- larval populatione1
- Direction
- followed bye1
- Value
- 1.822e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“recorded minimum larval population followed by (T2) Spinosad 45%SC (1.289) (T1) Indoxacarb (1.467), (T4) Emamectin benzoate (1.645) and (T7) Bacillus thuringiensis 1x108CFU (1.822),(T3) Beauveria bassiana (1.989)”
t1“on Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
Beauveria bassiana was followed by a larval population of 1.989.
- Taxon
- GreengramVigna radiata var. radiatat1
- Treatment
- Beauveria bassianae1
- Outcome
- larval populatione1
- Direction
- followed bye1
- Value
- 1.989e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“recorded minimum larval population followed by (T2) Spinosad 45%SC (1.289) (T1) Indoxacarb (1.467), (T4) Emamectin benzoate (1.645) and (T7) Bacillus thuringiensis 1x108CFU (1.822),(T3) Beauveria bassiana (1.989)”
t1“on Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem oil 2% recorded the maximum larval population of 2.134.
- Taxon
- GreengramVigna radiata var. radiatat1
- Treatment
- Neem oile1
- Outcome
- larval populatione1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 2.134e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the maximum larval population was recorded in (T5) Neem oil (2.134)”
t1“on Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC gave the highest yield of 16.9 q/ha.
- Taxon
- GreengramVigna radiata var. radiatat1
- Treatment
- Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SCe1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 16.9q/hae1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the highest yield (16.9q/ha) was obtained from the treatment Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC”
t1“on Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC gave a high benefit-cost ratio of 1:4.13.
- Taxon
- GreengramVigna radiata var. radiatat1
- Treatment
- Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SCe2
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe1
- Direction
- highe1
- Value
- 1:4.13e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“B:C ratio (1:4.13) obtained high from this treatment”
e2“the highest yield (16.9q/ha) was obtained from the treatment Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC”
t1“on Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad 45% SC gave a benefit-cost ratio of 1:3.99.
- Taxon
- GreengramVigna radiata var. radiatat1
- Treatment
- Spinosad 45%SCe1
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe2
- Direction
- followed bye1
- Value
- 1:3.99e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“It was followed by Spinosad 45%SC (1:3.99), Indoxacarb14.5SC (1:3:94), Neem oil 2% (1:3.52), Emamectin benzoate (1:3.59),Bacillus thuringiensis 4% WSP (1:3.39), Beauveria bassiana 1.15% WP (1:3.18)”
e2“B:C ratio (1:4.13) obtained high from this treatment”
t1“on Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb gave a benefit-cost ratio of 1:3:94.
- Taxon
- GreengramVigna radiata var. radiatat1
- Treatment
- Indoxacarb14.5SCe1
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe2
- Direction
- followed bye1
- Value
- 1:3:94e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“It was followed by Spinosad 45%SC (1:3.99), Indoxacarb14.5SC (1:3:94), Neem oil 2% (1:3.52), Emamectin benzoate (1:3.59),Bacillus thuringiensis 4% WSP (1:3.39), Beauveria bassiana 1.15% WP (1:3.18)”
e2“B:C ratio (1:4.13) obtained high from this treatment”
t1“on Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem oil 2% gave a benefit-cost ratio of 1:3.52.
- Taxon
- GreengramVigna radiata var. radiatat1
- Treatment
- Neem oil 2%e1
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe2
- Direction
- followed bye1
- Value
- 1:3.52e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“It was followed by Spinosad 45%SC (1:3.99), Indoxacarb14.5SC (1:3:94), Neem oil 2% (1:3.52), Emamectin benzoate (1:3.59),Bacillus thuringiensis 4% WSP (1:3.39), Beauveria bassiana 1.15% WP (1:3.18)”
e2“B:C ratio (1:4.13) obtained high from this treatment”
t1“on Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate gave a benefit-cost ratio of 1:3.59.
- Taxon
- GreengramVigna radiata var. radiatat1
- Treatment
- Emamectin benzoatee1
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe2
- Direction
- followed bye1
- Value
- 1:3.59e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“It was followed by Spinosad 45%SC (1:3.99), Indoxacarb14.5SC (1:3:94), Neem oil 2% (1:3.52), Emamectin benzoate (1:3.59),Bacillus thuringiensis 4% WSP (1:3.39), Beauveria bassiana 1.15% WP (1:3.18)”
e2“B:C ratio (1:4.13) obtained high from this treatment”
t1“on Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacillus thuringiensis 4% WSP gave a benefit-cost ratio of 1:3.39.
- Taxon
- GreengramVigna radiata var. radiatat1
- Treatment
- Bacillus thuringiensis 4% WSPe1
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe2
- Direction
- followed bye1
- Value
- 1:3.39e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“It was followed by Spinosad 45%SC (1:3.99), Indoxacarb14.5SC (1:3:94), Neem oil 2% (1:3.52), Emamectin benzoate (1:3.59),Bacillus thuringiensis 4% WSP (1:3.39), Beauveria bassiana 1.15% WP (1:3.18)”
e2“B:C ratio (1:4.13) obtained high from this treatment”
t1“on Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
Beauveria bassiana 1.15% WP gave a benefit-cost ratio of 1:3.18.
- Taxon
- GreengramVigna radiata var. radiatat1
- Treatment
- Beauveria bassiana 1.15% WPe1
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe2
- Direction
- followed bye1
- Value
- 1:3.18e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“It was followed by Spinosad 45%SC (1:3.99), Indoxacarb14.5SC (1:3:94), Neem oil 2% (1:3.52), Emamectin benzoate (1:3.59),Bacillus thuringiensis 4% WSP (1:3.39), Beauveria bassiana 1.15% WP (1:3.18)”
e2“B:C ratio (1:4.13) obtained high from this treatment”
t1“on Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
Claim · model-written summary
The control plot had a benefit-cost ratio of 1:1:19.
- Taxon
- GreengramVigna radiata var. radiatat1
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe2
- Value
- 1:1:19e1
- Qualifier
- control plote1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“as compared to control plot (1:1:19)”
e2“B:C ratio (1:4.13) obtained high from this treatment”
t1“on Greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)”
The same questions in other papers
emamectin benzoate · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →spinosad · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Bacillus thuringiensis · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Bacillus thuringiensis · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Beauveria bassiana · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
emamectin benzoate · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
indoxacarb · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
chlorantraniliprole · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.