Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Bio-efficacy and economics of newer insecticides against major sucking pests as well as yield of summer green gram

Piyush H Patel; JJ Patel; Denisha R Patel

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) is a major pulse crop belongs to the family Leguminaceae and native to Indo-Burma region of Southeast Asia. It is attacked by various pests among them sucking pests are important pest of green gram. Thus, seven insecticides were evaluated against major sucking pests of green gram. Among them, flonicamid 50 WG and imidacloprid 17.8 SL against Aphid (A. craccivora); imidacloprid 17.8 SL and flonicamid 50 WG against jassid, E. (kerri) and diafenthiuron 50 WP against whitefly (B. tabaci) found most effective. Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC gives higher grain yield (1114 kg/ha) and haulm yield (1540 kg/ha) followed by flubendiamide 20 WG and emamectin benzoate 5 SG. The maximum per cent increase in grain and haulm yield over control was recorded in chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (53.30, 43.31%, respectively). No avoidable losses in grain and haulm yield was occurred in chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC followed by flubendiamide 20 WG (3.59 and 2.61%, respectively). The highest ICBR obtained in the treatment of imidacloprid 17.8 SL (1:5.19).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flonicamid 50 WG was most effective against aphid (A. craccivora) on green gram.

Treatment
flonicamid 50 WGe1
Interactor
Aphid (A. craccivora)e1pest
Outcome
most effectivee1
Direction
most effectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) is a major pulse crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“flonicamid 50 WG and imidacloprid 17.8 SL against Aphid (A. craccivora); imidacloprid 17.8 SL and flonicamid 50 WG against jassid, E. (kerri) and diafenthiuron 50 WP against whitefly (B. tabaci) found most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 17.8 SL was most effective against aphid (A. craccivora) on green gram.

Treatment
imidacloprid 17.8 SLe1
Interactor
Aphid (A. craccivora)e1pest
Outcome
most effectivee1
Direction
most effectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) is a major pulse crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“flonicamid 50 WG and imidacloprid 17.8 SL against Aphid (A. craccivora); imidacloprid 17.8 SL and flonicamid 50 WG against jassid, E. (kerri) and diafenthiuron 50 WP against whitefly (B. tabaci) found most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 17.8 SL was most effective against jassid (E. kerri) on green gram.

Treatment
imidacloprid 17.8 SLe1
Interactor
jassid, E. (kerri)e1pest
Outcome
most effectivee1
Direction
most effectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) is a major pulse crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“flonicamid 50 WG and imidacloprid 17.8 SL against Aphid (A. craccivora); imidacloprid 17.8 SL and flonicamid 50 WG against jassid, E. (kerri) and diafenthiuron 50 WP against whitefly (B. tabaci) found most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flonicamid 50 WG was most effective against jassid (E. kerri) on green gram.

Treatment
flonicamid 50 WGe1
Interactor
jassid, E. (kerri)e1pest
Outcome
most effectivee1
Direction
most effectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) is a major pulse crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“flonicamid 50 WG and imidacloprid 17.8 SL against Aphid (A. craccivora); imidacloprid 17.8 SL and flonicamid 50 WG against jassid, E. (kerri) and diafenthiuron 50 WP against whitefly (B. tabaci) found most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diafenthiuron 50 WP was most effective against whitefly (B. tabaci) on green gram.

Treatment
diafenthiuron 50 WPe1
Interactor
whitefly (B. tabaci)e1pest
Outcome
most effectivee1
Direction
most effectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) is a major pulse crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“flonicamid 50 WG and imidacloprid 17.8 SL against Aphid (A. craccivora); imidacloprid 17.8 SL and flonicamid 50 WG against jassid, E. (kerri) and diafenthiuron 50 WP against whitefly (B. tabaci) found most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC gave higher grain yield (1114 kg/ha) on green gram.

Treatment
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SCe2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
1114 kg/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) is a major pulse crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e2

“Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC gives higher grain yield (1114 kg/ha) and haulm yield (1540 kg/ha) followed by flubendiamide 20 WG and emamectin benzoate 5 SG”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC gave higher haulm yield (1540 kg/ha) on green gram.

Treatment
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SCe2
Outcome
haulm yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
1540 kg/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) is a major pulse crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e2

“Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC gives higher grain yield (1114 kg/ha) and haulm yield (1540 kg/ha) followed by flubendiamide 20 WG and emamectin benzoate 5 SG”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide 20 WG ranked after chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC for yield on green gram.

Treatment
flubendiamide 20 WGe2
Outcome
followed bye2
Direction
followed bye2
Comparator
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SCe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) is a major pulse crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e2

“Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC gives higher grain yield (1114 kg/ha) and haulm yield (1540 kg/ha) followed by flubendiamide 20 WG and emamectin benzoate 5 SG”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate 5 SG ranked after chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC for yield on green gram.

Treatment
emamectin benzoate 5 SGe2
Outcome
followed bye2
Direction
followed bye2
Comparator
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SCe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) is a major pulse crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e2

“Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC gives higher grain yield (1114 kg/ha) and haulm yield (1540 kg/ha) followed by flubendiamide 20 WG and emamectin benzoate 5 SG”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC gave the maximum percent increase in grain yield over control (53.30%).

Treatment
chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SCe3
Outcome
graine3
Direction
maximum per cent increasee3
Value
53.30e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) is a major pulse crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e3

“The maximum per cent increase in grain and haulm yield over control was recorded in chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (53.30, 43.31%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC gave the maximum percent increase in haulm yield over control (43.31%).

Treatment
chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SCe3
Outcome
haulme3
Direction
maximum per cent increasee3
Value
43.31%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) is a major pulse crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e3

“The maximum per cent increase in grain and haulm yield over control was recorded in chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (53.30, 43.31%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No avoidable grain or haulm yield losses occurred with chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC followed by flubendiamide 20 WG (3.59 and 2.61%).

Treatment
chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC followed by flubendiamide 20 WGe4
Outcome
avoidable losses in grain and haulm yielde4
Direction
No avoidable lossese4
Value
3.59 and 2.61%e4
Qualifier
respectivelye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) is a major pulse crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e4

“No avoidable losses in grain and haulm yield was occurred in chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC followed by flubendiamide 20 WG (3.59 and 2.61%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 17.8 SL gave the highest ICBR (1:5.19) on green gram.

Treatment
imidacloprid 17.8 SLe5
Outcome
ICBRe5
Direction
higheste5
Value
1:5.19e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) is a major pulse crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest ICBR obtained in the treatment of imidacloprid 17.8 SL (1:5.19)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1076 · show in text ↑

chlorantraniliprole · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.