Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Biotechnology

Bio-efficacy of chemical Insecticides against Spotted Pod Borer,Maruca testulalis(Geyer) on Cowpea

N.K. Yadav; P. S. Singh

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Studies were conducted at Agricultural Research Farm, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi during Kharif 2010 and 2011 to know the efficacy of some new molecule insecticides (azadirachtin, Bt, endosulfan 35% EC, thiodicarb 75% WP, spinosad 45% SC, lambda cyhalothrin 5% EC, indoxacarb 14.5% SC, profenophos 50% EC and acetamiprid 20% SP) against spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) on mungbean. The spinosad 45% SC and indoxacarb 14.5% SC were the most effective treatments and significantly superior to other treatments with 80.7 and 79.2 per cent larval reduction over control. The least effective treatment was acetamiprid 20%SP, followed by azadirachtin with 38.8 and 44.9 per cent reduction in larval population over control. The maximum yield was recorded in treatment indoxacarb 14.5%SC (11.8q/ha) followed by spinosad 45%SC (11.1q/ha) which were at par with each other. While lowest yield was recorded in azadirachtin (9.7q/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 45% SC gave 80.7 per cent larval reduction over control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
spinosad 45% SCe1
Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratae0pest
Outcome
larval reductione1
Direction
reductione1
Value
80.7e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“against spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) on mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–397 · show in text ↑
e1

“The spinosad 45% SC and indoxacarb 14.5% SC were the most effective treatments and significantly superior to other treatments with 80.7 and 79.2 per cent larval reduction over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–582 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb 14.5% SC gave 79.2 per cent larval reduction over control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
indoxacarb 14.5% SCe1
Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratae0pest
Outcome
larval reductione1
Direction
reductione1
Value
79.2e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“against spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) on mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–397 · show in text ↑
e1

“The spinosad 45% SC and indoxacarb 14.5% SC were the most effective treatments and significantly superior to other treatments with 80.7 and 79.2 per cent larval reduction over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–582 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid 20%SP was the least effective treatment, with 38.8 reduction in larval population over control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
acetamiprid 20%SPe2
Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratae0pest
Outcome
reduction in larval populatione2
Direction
reductione2
Value
38.8e2
Qualifier
least effectivee2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“against spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) on mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–397 · show in text ↑
e2

“The least effective treatment was acetamiprid 20%SP, followed by azadirachtin with 38.8 and 44.9 per cent reduction in larval population over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin gave 44.9 per cent reduction in larval population over control.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
azadirachtine2
Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratae0pest
Outcome
reduction in larval populatione2
Direction
reductione2
Value
44.9 per cente2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“against spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) on mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–397 · show in text ↑
e2

“The least effective treatment was acetamiprid 20%SP, followed by azadirachtin with 38.8 and 44.9 per cent reduction in larval population over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb 14.5%SC gave the maximum mungbean yield (11.8q/ha).

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
indoxacarb 14.5%SCe3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
maximume3
Value
11.8q/hae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“against spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) on mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–397 · show in text ↑
e3

“The maximum yield was recorded in treatment indoxacarb 14.5%SC (11.8q/ha) followed by spinosad 45%SC (11.1q/ha) which were at par with each other”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–880 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 45%SC yield (11.1q/ha) was at par with indoxacarb 14.5%SC.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
spinosad 45%SCe3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
at pare3
Value
11.1q/hae3
Comparator
indoxacarb 14.5%SCe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“against spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) on mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–397 · show in text ↑
e3

“The maximum yield was recorded in treatment indoxacarb 14.5%SC (11.8q/ha) followed by spinosad 45%SC (11.1q/ha) which were at par with each other”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–880 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin gave the lowest mungbean yield (9.7q/ha).

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
azadirachtine4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
loweste4
Value
9.7q/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“against spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) on mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–397 · show in text ↑
e4

“While lowest yield was recorded in azadirachtin (9.7q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–939 · show in text ↑

azadirachtin · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

spinosad · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

indoxacarb · Maruca vitrata · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

spinosad · Maruca vitrata · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

indoxacarb · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.