Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Effect of Plant Growth Regulator on Growth, Physiology and Yield of Direct Sown Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)

P. Srinithi; R. Mohanapriya; K. Sharmili; et al.

3
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Aims: To determine the “Effect of plant growth regulator on growth, physiology and yield of direct sown finger millet”. Place and Duration of Study: The field experiment was conducted during rabi 2022 at South Farm, Division of Agronomy, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore.The soil of the experimental field was sandy clay loam in texture, nearly neutral in soil reaction (pH 5.36), level of organic carbon (1.03%), available N (289 kg/ha), P (115 kg/ha) and K (437 kg/ha). Study Design: Completely randomized block design. Methodology: T1 (RDF + Water spray - Control), T2 (100% RDF + Foliar spraying of Brassinosteroid @ 0.5 ppm), T3 (100% RDF + Foliar spraying of Gibberellic acid @10 ppm), T4 (100% RDF + Foliar spraying of Salicylic acid @100 ppm), T5 (50% RDF + Foliar spraying of Brassinosteroid @ 0.5 ppm), T6 (50% RDF + Foliar spraying of Gibberellic acid @10 ppm), T7 (50% RDF + Foliar spraying of Salicylic acid @100 ppm), T8 (Foliar spraying of Brassinosteroid @ 0.5 ppm), T9 (Foliar spraying of Gibberellic acid @10 ppm), T10 (Foliar spraying of Salicylic acid @100 ppm). Results: The experiment was laid out in RBD and showed that 100% RDF + Foliar spraying of Brassinosteroid @ 0.5 ppm (T2) gave highest No. of tillers/hill, Dry matter production, leaf area index, grain yield, straw yield, harvest index, post-harvest NPK uptake of finger millet. when comparedcontrol (Farmer practice). Conclusion: From this study, it was concluded that PGR along with nutrients application increases the nutrient uptake and yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full RDF plus foliar brassinosteroid at 0.5 ppm gave the highest tillers per hill, dry matter production and leaf area index in finger millet compared with farmer-practice control.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
100% RDF + Foliar spraying of Brassinosteroid @ 0.5 ppm (T2)e0
Outcome
No. of tillers/hill, Dry matter production, leaf area indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
control (Farmer practice)e1
Setting
field experimente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Direct Sown Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“100% RDF + Foliar spraying of Brassinosteroid @ 0.5 ppm (T2) gave highest No. of tillers/hill, Dry matter production, leaf area index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1300 · show in text ↑
e1

“when comparedcontrol (Farmer practice)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1423 · show in text ↑
e2

“The field experiment was conducted during rabi 2022 at South Farm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full RDF plus foliar brassinosteroid at 0.5 ppm gave the highest grain yield, straw yield and harvest index of finger millet compared with farmer-practice control.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
100% RDF + Foliar spraying of Brassinosteroid @ 0.5 ppm (T2)e0
Outcome
grain yield, straw yield, harvest indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
control (Farmer practice)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Direct Sown Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“100% RDF + Foliar spraying of Brassinosteroid @ 0.5 ppm (T2) gave highest No. of tillers/hill, Dry matter production, leaf area index, grain yield, straw yield, harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1341 · show in text ↑
e1

“when comparedcontrol (Farmer practice)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full RDF plus foliar brassinosteroid at 0.5 ppm gave the highest post-harvest NPK uptake of finger millet compared with farmer-practice control.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
100% RDF + Foliar spraying of Brassinosteroid @ 0.5 ppm (T2)e0
Outcome
post-harvest NPK uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
control (Farmer practice)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Direct Sown Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–116 · show in text ↑
e0

“100% RDF + Foliar spraying of Brassinosteroid @ 0.5 ppm (T2) gave highest No. of tillers/hill, Dry matter production, leaf area index, grain yield, straw yield, harvest index, post-harvest NPK uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1366 · show in text ↑
e1

“when comparedcontrol (Farmer practice)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1423 · show in text ↑

application · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 171 positive, 3 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

class · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

56 papers: 56 positive, 0 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.