Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Impact of Organic Nutrient Management on Productivity, Nutrient Uptake and Economics of Finger millet in Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) – Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.) Cropping System

M.R. Ananda; Sharan appa; K.N. Kalyana Murthy

20
claims
43
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi 2015 and rabi 2016 in farmers’ field of Chokkahalli village of Chintamani taluk, Chikkaballapura district coming under eastern dry zone Karnataka to study the effect of bio-digested liquid manures on productivity, nutrient uptake and economics of finger millet. Significantly higher grain and straw yield (3787 and 5125 kg ha-1) was recorded with the application of EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 %, which was on par with application of EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of vermiwash @ 3 % (3695 and 5169 kg ha-1). Significantly lower grain yield (3288 and4930 kg ha-1) was recorded with POP (50:37.5:40 Kg N: P2O5:K2O ha-1) and also significantly higher uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (129.93, 12.7 and 82.10 kg ha-1, respectively) was noticed with EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 % as compared to other treatments and it was on par with EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of vermiwash @ 3 % (125.48,11.87 and 79.4 kg ha-1, respectively). However, significantly lower uptake of nutrients (101.22, 8.70 and 66.55 kg ha-1, respectively) was noticed with POP (50:37.5:40 Kg N: P2O5:K2O ha-1). Further, Application of EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 % recorded higher gross returns (Rs.1,43,167 ha-1), net returns (Rs.1,13,671 ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.85) followed by EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of vermiwash @ 3 % (Rs.1,40,332 ha-1, Rs.1,11,146 ha-1 and 3.81, respectively). Whereas, POP (50:37.5:40 Kg N: P2O5:K2O ha-1) recorded lower gross returns (Rs. 1,24,286 ha-1), net returns (Rs.93,725 ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.06) when compared to all other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Panchagavya treatment gave higher grain yield of 3787 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 %e0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
Significantly highere0
Value
3787e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher grain and straw yield (3787 and 5125 kg ha-1) was recorded with the application of EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Panchagavya treatment gave higher straw yield of 5125 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 %e0
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
Significantly highere0
Value
5125 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher grain and straw yield (3787 and 5125 kg ha-1) was recorded with the application of EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermiwash treatment gave comparable grain yield of 3695 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of vermiwash @ 3 %e0
Outcome
applicatione0
Direction
on pare0
Value
3695e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was on par with application of EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of vermiwash @ 3 % (3695 and 5169 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermiwash treatment gave comparable straw yield of 5169 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of vermiwash @ 3 %e0
Outcome
applicatione0
Direction
on pare0
Value
5169e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was on par with application of EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of vermiwash @ 3 % (3695 and 5169 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

POP gave lower grain yield of 3288 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
POP (50:37.5:40 Kg N: P2O5:K2O ha-1)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Significantly lowere0
Value
3288e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly lower grain yield (3288 and4930 kg ha-1) was recorded with POP (50:37.5:40 Kg N: P2O5:K2O ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Panchagavya treatment gave higher nitrogen uptake of 129.93 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 %e0
Outcome
uptake of nitrogene0
Direction
significantly highere0
Value
129.93e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (129.93, 12.7 and 82.10 kg ha-1, respectively) was noticed with EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Panchagavya treatment gave higher phosphorus uptake of 12.7 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 %e0
Outcome
uptakee0
Direction
significantly highere0
Value
12.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (129.93, 12.7 and 82.10 kg ha-1, respectively) was noticed with EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Panchagavya treatment gave higher potassium uptake of 82.10 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 %e0
Outcome
uptakee0
Direction
significantly highere0
Value
82.10e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (129.93, 12.7 and 82.10 kg ha-1, respectively) was noticed with EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermiwash treatment had comparable nitrogen uptake, 125.48 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of vermiwash @ 3 %e0
Outcome
uptakee1
Direction
on pare0
Value
125.48e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on par with EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of vermiwash @ 3 % (125.48,11.87 and 79.4 kg ha-1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly higher uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (129.93, 12.7 and 82.10 kg ha-1, respectively) was noticed with EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermiwash treatment had comparable phosphorus uptake, 11.87 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of vermiwash @ 3 %e0
Outcome
uptakee1
Direction
on pare0
Value
11.87e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on par with EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of vermiwash @ 3 % (125.48,11.87 and 79.4 kg ha-1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly higher uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (129.93, 12.7 and 82.10 kg ha-1, respectively) was noticed with EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermiwash treatment had comparable potassium uptake, 79.4 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of vermiwash @ 3 %e0
Outcome
uptakee1
Direction
on pare0
Value
79.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on par with EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of vermiwash @ 3 % (125.48,11.87 and 79.4 kg ha-1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly higher uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (129.93, 12.7 and 82.10 kg ha-1, respectively) was noticed with EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

POP had lower nitrogen uptake, 101.22 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
POP (50:37.5:40 Kg N: P2O5:K2O ha-1)e0
Outcome
uptake of nutrientse0
Direction
significantly lowere0
Value
101.22e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly lower uptake of nutrients (101.22, 8.70 and 66.55 kg ha-1, respectively) was noticed with POP (50:37.5:40 Kg N: P2O5:K2O ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

POP had lower phosphorus uptake, 8.70 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
POP (50:37.5:40 Kg N: P2O5:K2O ha-1)e0
Outcome
uptake of nutrientse0
Direction
significantly lowere0
Value
8.70e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly lower uptake of nutrients (101.22, 8.70 and 66.55 kg ha-1, respectively) was noticed with POP (50:37.5:40 Kg N: P2O5:K2O ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

POP had lower potassium uptake, 66.55 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
POP (50:37.5:40 Kg N: P2O5:K2O ha-1)e0
Outcome
uptake of nutrientse0
Direction
significantly lowere0
Value
66.55e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly lower uptake of nutrients (101.22, 8.70 and 66.55 kg ha-1, respectively) was noticed with POP (50:37.5:40 Kg N: P2O5:K2O ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panchagavya treatment had higher gross returns, Rs.1,43,167 ha-1.

Taxon
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 %e0
Outcome
gross returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs.1,43,167 ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 % recorded higher gross returns (Rs.1,43,167 ha-1), net returns (Rs.1,13,671 ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.85)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1417 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panchagavya treatment had higher net returns, Rs.1,13,671 ha-1.

Taxon
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 %e0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs.1,13,671 ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 % recorded higher gross returns (Rs.1,43,167 ha-1), net returns (Rs.1,13,671 ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.85)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1417 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panchagavya treatment had higher B:C ratio, 3.85.

Taxon
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 %e0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.85e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of panchagavya @ 3 % recorded higher gross returns (Rs.1,43,167 ha-1), net returns (Rs.1,13,671 ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.85)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1417 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermiwash treatment had gross returns of Rs.1,40,332 ha-1.

Taxon
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of vermiwash @ 3 %e0
Outcome
followed bye0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
Rs.1,40,332 ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of vermiwash @ 3 % (Rs.1,40,332 ha-1, Rs.1,11,146 ha-1 and 3.81, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermiwash treatment had net returns of Rs.1,11,146 ha-1.

Taxon
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of vermiwash @ 3 %e0
Outcome
followed bye0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
Rs.1,11,146 ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of vermiwash @ 3 % (Rs.1,40,332 ha-1, Rs.1,11,146 ha-1 and 3.81, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermiwash treatment had B:C ratio of 3.81.

Taxon
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)Eleusine coracanat0
Treatment
EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of vermiwash @ 3 %e0
Outcome
followed bye0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
3.81e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by EBDLM @ 50 kg N equivalent ha-1 + 3 sprays of vermiwash @ 3 % (Rs.1,40,332 ha-1, Rs.1,11,146 ha-1 and 3.81, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 139–175 · show in text ↑

potassium · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

potassium · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

application · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

56 papers: 56 positive, 0 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.