Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Science Technology and Society

Effects of Integrated Decomposed Cattle Manure and Blended (NPSB) Inorganic Fertilizer on Yield and Yield Components of Finger Millet (Eleusine Coracana (L) Gaertn.) in West Region of Ethiopia

Fufa Anbessa; Hayssilu Feyisa; Galata Garama

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) is major food crop of semi-aid of tropics of Africa and Asia which is indigenous to Ethiopia. The experiment was conducted in western part of Ethiopia Bako, B/Boshe and Gute in 2020-2022 cropping season with the objective of identifying the optimum and economically feasible integrated decomposed cattle manure and in-organic fertilizer for finger millet production in western part of Ethiopia. The experiment contains five level of in organic fertilizer 0, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of recommended inorganic fertilizer and four level of decomposed cattle manure 0, 3tone/ha, 6tone/ha and 9tone/ha combined in factorial arrangement in RCBD design. The integrated fertilizer affected grain yield, dry biomass, ear length, harvest index, effective tillers per plant, number of fingers per plant and plant height. The highest grain yield 2546kg/ha was observed on integration of 100% and 9tone/ha when 2195kg/ha from the integration of 6tone/ha and 75% recommended fertilizer. The number of effective tillers per plant was not affected by the fertilizer. In economic analysis both integration of 100% with 9ton and 75% with 6tone/ha were economically feasible having 758 and 998 MRR respectively. Using 75% recommended fertilizer and 6tone/hectare is more economical. Therefore, it is advisable for farmers using the integration of 6tone/ha and 75% recommended inorganic fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated fertilizer affected grain yield, dry biomass and ear length.

Taxon
Finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
integrated fertilizere0
Outcome
grain yield, dry biomass, ear lengthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The integrated fertilizer affected grain yield, dry biomass, ear length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 120–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated fertilizer affected harvest index, fingers per plant and plant height.

Taxon
Finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
integrated fertilizere0
Outcome
harvest index, effective tillers per plant, number of fingers per plant and plant heighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The integrated fertilizer affected grain yield, dry biomass, ear length, harvest index, effective tillers per plant, number of fingers per plant and plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 120–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest grain yield was 2546kg/ha under 100% inorganic fertilizer plus 9tone/ha manure.

Taxon
Finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
integration of 100% and 9tone/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2546kg/hae0
Qualifier
2195kg/hae0
Comparator
integration of 6tone/ha and 75% recommended fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield 2546kg/ha was observed on integration of 100% and 9tone/ha when 2195kg/ha from the integration of 6tone/ha and 75% recommended fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 120–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective tillers per plant were not affected by fertilizer.

Taxon
Finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
fertilizere0
Outcome
number of effective tillers per plante0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of effective tillers per plant was not affected by the fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 120–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% fertilizer plus 9ton manure integration was economically feasible with MRR of 758.

Taxon
Finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
integration of 100% with 9tone0
Outcome
economically feasiblee0
Value
758e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integration of 100% with 9ton and 75% with 6tone/ha were economically feasible having 758 and 998 MRR respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 120–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% fertilizer plus 6tone/ha integration was economically feasible with MRR of 998.

Taxon
Finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
75% with 6tone/hae0
Outcome
economically feasiblee0
Value
998e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integration of 100% with 9ton and 75% with 6tone/ha were economically feasible having 758 and 998 MRR respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 120–133 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend integrating 6tone/ha manure with 75% inorganic fertilizer.

Taxon
Finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Outcome
integration of 6tone/ha and 75% recommended inorganic fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is advisable for farmers using the integration of 6tone/ha and 75% recommended inorganic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1412 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger millet”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 120–133 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 171 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 171 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.