Paper · 2023 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Biofertilizer and Inorganic Fertilizers Effect on Favorable Characters for Productivity of Chickpea in Bundelkhand of Madhya Pradesh

R.K. Singh; S.R.K. Singh; Uttam Tripathi; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background: A field experiment was conducted at the Instructional Farm of Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Chhatarpur during two consecutive rabi seasons of 2017-18 and 2018-19 to evaluate the effect of biofertilizers with 75% recommended dose of fertilizers on growth, yield, nutrient uptake, nutrient use efficiency and B:C ratio of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Methods: In the two consecutive rabi seasons of 2017-18 and 2018-19, the experiment was laid out in randomized block design with improved wilt resistant variety of chickpea (JAKI 9218). Experiment consisted of five treatments including T0 (control), T1 (recommended dose of N:P2O5:K2O as 20:60:20 kg ha-1), T2 (recommended dose of NPK + seed inoculation by Rhizobium @ 10 g kg-1 seed), T3 (recommended dose of NPK + seed inoculation by Rhizobium and PSB separately @ 10 g kg-1 seed) and T4 (75% of recommended NPK + seed inoculation by Rhizobium @ 10 g kg-1 seed + soil application of PSB and KSB each @ 5 kg ha-1). Result: The result showed that among the biofertilizers seed treatment with Rhizobium leguminosorum @ 10 g kg-1 seed and soil application of PSB and KSB @ 5 as above along with application of 75% recommended dose of fertilizers have been significantly enhanced root nodule formation, fertilizer use efficiency, productivity and reduced wilt infestation under this treatment followed by recommended dose of NPK + seed inoculation by Rhizobium and PSB separately @ 10 g kg-1 seed as compared to control plot.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% fertilizer plus Rhizobium, PSB and KSB regime significantly enhanced chickpea root nodule formation relative to control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
seed treatment with Rhizobium leguminosorum @ 10 g kg-1 seed and soil application of PSB and KSB @ 5 as above along with application of 75% recommended dose of fertilizerse0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosorume0symbiont
Outcome
root nodule formatione0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with Rhizobium leguminosorum @ 10 g kg-1 seed and soil application of PSB and KSB @ 5 as above along with application of 75% recommended dose of fertilizers have been significantly enhanced root nodule formation, fertilizer use efficiency, productivity and reduced wilt infestation under this treatment followed by recommended dose of NPK + seed inoculation by Rhizobium and PSB separately @ 10 g kg-1 seed as compared to control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1476 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–353 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment significantly enhanced chickpea fertilizer use efficiency and productivity relative to control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
seed treatment with Rhizobium leguminosorum @ 10 g kg-1 seed and soil application of PSB and KSB @ 5 as above along with application of 75% recommended dose of fertilizerse0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosorume0symbiont
Outcome
fertilizer use efficiency, productivitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with Rhizobium leguminosorum @ 10 g kg-1 seed and soil application of PSB and KSB @ 5 as above along with application of 75% recommended dose of fertilizers have been significantly enhanced root nodule formation, fertilizer use efficiency, productivity and reduced wilt infestation under this treatment followed by recommended dose of NPK + seed inoculation by Rhizobium and PSB separately @ 10 g kg-1 seed as compared to control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1476 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–353 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment significantly reduced chickpea wilt infestation relative to control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
seed treatment with Rhizobium leguminosorum @ 10 g kg-1 seed and soil application of PSB and KSB @ 5 as above along with application of 75% recommended dose of fertilizerse0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosorume0symbiont
Outcome
wilt infestatione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed treatment with Rhizobium leguminosorum @ 10 g kg-1 seed and soil application of PSB and KSB @ 5 as above along with application of 75% recommended dose of fertilizers have been significantly enhanced root nodule formation, fertilizer use efficiency, productivity and reduced wilt infestation under this treatment followed by recommended dose of NPK + seed inoculation by Rhizobium and PSB separately @ 10 g kg-1 seed as compared to control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1476 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–353 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Rhizobium and PSB seed inoculation regime ranked after the 75% fertilizer plus three-inoculant regime.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
recommended dose of NPK + seed inoculation by Rhizobium and PSB separately @ 10 g kg-1 seede0
Outcome
followed bye0
Direction
followed bye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under this treatment followed by recommended dose of NPK + seed inoculation by Rhizobium and PSB separately @ 10 g kg-1 seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1448 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–353 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

120 papers: 116 positive, 4 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Rhizobium · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

48 papers: 43 positive, 5 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

90 papers: 82 positive, 8 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

fertilization · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

application · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 35 positive, 4 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.