Paper · 2010 · Pakistan Journal of Botany

Seed treatments induced systemic resistance in chickpea against fusarium wilt in wilt sick field

Nighat Sarwar; M. Hayat Zahid; Ikram Ul Haq

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Induced systemic resistance in chickpea against wilt disease caused by Fusarium oxysorum f. sp. ciceri (FOC) was studied by treating the seeds with benzo (1,2,3)-thiadizole-7-carbothioic acid - s- methyl ester (Bion), salicylic acid (SA) and di- potassium hydrogen phosphate (K2HPO4). Reduction in disease was observed in both type of applications but seed dressing was found more effective than soaking method. Highest reduction, 63% in wilt disease was observed with Bion dressing followed by SA, 40% and K2HPO4 , 30%. Bion and SA showed 41 & 24% reduction in the disease, respectively, when seeds were soaked in the respective chemicals but no reduction was found with K2HPO4 soaking. Slight increase in yield was observed with all the treatments in both applications but difference among them was statistically non-significant

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed dressing reduced chickpea wilt more than soaking.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
seed dressinge0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysorum f. sp. cicerie1pathogen
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
soaking methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction in disease was observed in both type of applications but seed dressing was found more effective than soaking method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–410 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea against wilt disease caused by Fusarium oxysorum f. sp. ciceri (FOC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bion dressing reduced wilt 63%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Bion dressinge0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysorum f. sp. cicerie1pathogen
Outcome
wilt diseasee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
63%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest reduction, 63% in wilt disease was observed with Bion dressing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–482 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea against wilt disease caused by Fusarium oxysorum f. sp. ciceri (FOC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA dressing reduced wilt 40%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
SAe0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysorum f. sp. cicerie1pathogen
Outcome
wilt diseasee2
Direction
reductione2
Value
40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by SA, 40% and K2HPO4 , 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–519 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea against wilt disease caused by Fusarium oxysorum f. sp. ciceri (FOC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“Highest reduction, 63% in wilt disease was observed with Bion dressing followed by SA, 40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K2HPO4 dressing reduced wilt 30%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
K2HPO4e0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysorum f. sp. cicerie1pathogen
Outcome
wilt diseasee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest reduction, 63% in wilt disease was observed with Bion dressing followed by SA, 40% and K2HPO4 , 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–519 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea against wilt disease caused by Fusarium oxysorum f. sp. ciceri (FOC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bion soaking reduced wilt by the first reported percentage.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Bione0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysorum f. sp. cicerie1pathogen
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
41e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bion and SA showed 41 & 24% reduction in the disease, respectively, when seeds were soaked in the respective chemicals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–639 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea against wilt disease caused by Fusarium oxysorum f. sp. ciceri (FOC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA soaking reduced wilt 24%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
SAe0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysorum f. sp. cicerie1pathogen
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bion and SA showed 41 & 24% reduction in the disease, respectively, when seeds were soaked in the respective chemicals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–639 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea against wilt disease caused by Fusarium oxysorum f. sp. ciceri (FOC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K2HPO4 soaking did not reduce wilt.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
K2HPO4 soakinge0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysorum f. sp. cicerie1pathogen
Outcome
wilt diseasee1
Direction
no reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no reduction was found with K2HPO4 soaking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–686 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea against wilt disease caused by Fusarium oxysorum f. sp. ciceri (FOC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments slightly increased chickpea yield but differences were nonsignificant.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
all the treatments in both applicationse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Slight increase in yield was observed with all the treatments in both applications but difference among them was statistically non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–830 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–39 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 35 positive, 4 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.