Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during winter (rabi) of 2016–17 at the Students' Instructional Farm of Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh to evaluate the effect of different fertility levels and biofertilizers on agrophysiological performance, productivity and quality of late sown chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). The experiment comprised of 12 treatment combinations in split plot design which comprised 4 treatments [F1 (control), F2 (RDF 100%), F3 (75% RDF), F4 (50% RDF)] in main plot and 3 treatments [B1 (Rhizobium + PSB), B2 (Rhizobium + PGPR) and B3 (Rhizobium + PSB + PGPR)] in sub plots with three replications. Results showed that among the different fertility levels, application of 100% RDF significantly enhanced agrophysiological performance, yield attributes, yield, and protein yield over the control. Among the different biofertilizers treatments application of Rhizobium + PSB + PGPR had significantly improved agrophysiological performance, yield attributes, seed yield and protein yield as compared to Rhizobium + PGPR. The combined application of 100% RDF with Rhizobium + PSB + PGPR resulted in significantly higher seed yield of late sown chickpea during winter (rabi).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
100% RDF significantly enhanced chickpea agrophysiological performance, yield attributes and yield relative to control.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- agrophysiological performance, yield attributes, yielde0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of 100% RDF significantly enhanced agrophysiological performance, yield attributes, yield, and protein yield over the control.”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”
Claim · model-written summary
100% RDF significantly enhanced chickpea protein yield relative to control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- protein yielde0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of 100% RDF significantly enhanced agrophysiological performance, yield attributes, yield, and protein yield over the control.”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium plus PSB plus PGPR significantly improved chickpea agrophysiological performance, yield attributes and seed yield compared with Rhizobium plus PGPR.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Rhizobium + PSB + PGPRe0
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- agrophysiological performance, yield attributes, seed yielde0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Qualifier
- PGPRe0
- Comparator
- Rhizobium + PGPRe0
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of Rhizobium + PSB + PGPR had significantly improved agrophysiological performance, yield attributes, seed yield and protein yield as compared to Rhizobium + PGPR.”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium plus PSB plus PGPR significantly improved chickpea protein yield compared with Rhizobium plus PGPR.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Rhizobium + PSB + PGPRe0
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- protein yielde0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Qualifier
- PGPRe0
- Comparator
- Rhizobium + PGPRe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of Rhizobium + PSB + PGPR had significantly improved agrophysiological performance, yield attributes, seed yield and protein yield as compared to Rhizobium + PGPR.”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined 100% RDF and Rhizobium plus PSB plus PGPR produced significantly higher seed yield in late-sown winter chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- 100% RDF with Rhizobium + PSB + PGPRe0
- Second interactor
- PSBe0symbiont
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- PGPRe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The combined application of 100% RDF with Rhizobium + PSB + PGPR resulted in significantly higher seed yield of late sown chickpea during winter (rabi).”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
116 papers more in this group
See all 120 papers →Rhizobium · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
17 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →inoculation · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
213 papers more in this group
See all 217 papers →fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.