Paper · 2001 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

N2-FIXATION IN CHICKPEA: EFFECT OF HYDROQUINONE AS A UREASE INHIBITOR ON THE STABILITY OF 15N ENRICHMENT

F. Kurdali

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted to study the effect of fertilizing chickpea with 15N-labelled urea alone, urea with hydroquinone, or organic plant materials on the stability of 15N enrichment of available soil nitrogen (N). An isotopic dilution method was used to estimate N2-fixation using a non-nodulating chickpea genotype as a reference crop. The use of hydroquinone-containing urea as well as the use of labelled organic material resulted in a stable 15N enrichment of the available soil N with time as compared with urea alone. Estimates of N2-fixation were not affected by the three different 15N-labelled fertilizer applications employed. The high N2-fixation in chickpea, and the appropriate use of a reference crop, which has a unique N uptake pattern, can adjust the error in the estimation of N2 fixation when a decline occurs in 15N enrichment. On the other hand, the addition of hydroquinone to urea significantly increased its efficient use as a nitrogen fertilizer as compared with urea alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydroquinone-containing urea and labelled organic material gave a stable 15N enrichment of soil N over time, compared with urea alone.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
hydroquinone-containing urea as well as the use of labelled organic materiale1
Outcome
15N enrichment of the available soil Ne1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
urea alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“N2-FIXATION IN CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of hydroquinone-containing urea as well as the use of labelled organic material resulted in a stable 15N enrichment of the available soil N with time as compared with urea alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three different 15N-labelled fertilizer applications did not affect estimates of N2 fixation in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
three different 15N-labelled fertilizer applicationse2
Outcome
Estimates of N2-fixatione2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“N2-FIXATION IN CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e2

“Estimates of N2-fixation were not affected by the three different 15N-labelled fertilizer applications employed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding hydroquinone to urea significantly increased its efficient use as a nitrogen fertilizer compared with urea alone.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
addition of hydroquinone to ureae4
Outcome
efficient use as a nitrogen fertilizere4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
urea alonee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“N2-FIXATION IN CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e4

“On the other hand, the addition of hydroquinone to urea significantly increased its efficient use as a nitrogen fertilizer as compared with urea alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1007 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The high N2 fixation in chickpea allows the error in the estimation of N2 fixation to be adjusted when 15N enrichment declines, using a non-nodulating chickpea reference genotype.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
error in the estimation of N2 fixatione3
Comparator
non-nodulating chickpea genotypee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“N2-FIXATION IN CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 · show in text ↑
e3

“The high N2-fixation in chickpea, and the appropriate use of a reference crop, which has a unique N uptake pattern, can adjust the error in the estimation of N2 fixation when a decline occurs in 15N enrichment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–855 · show in text ↑
e5

“An isotopic dilution method was used to estimate N2-fixation using a non-nodulating chickpea genotype as a reference crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–344 · show in text ↑

fertilization · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

48 papers: 43 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.