Paper · 2022 · ZANCO Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences

The combined Application of Iron and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria to enhance Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth and yield

dedawan K.Rahman; Aras M Khudhur; Haifa S Yaseen

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study had the objective of evaluating the efficiency of prepared iron and phosphate biofertilizers in improving wheat growth and yield. To isolate bacteria that dissolve iron and phosphate, different soil samples were collected from the Erbil governorate, a total of eighteen iron solubilizing bacteria were selected on a modified agar medium and all isolates belonged to Pseudomonas fluorescence. Twenty-two isolates of phosphate solubilizing bacteria were recognized and referred to P. putida, P.fluorescens, and Bacillus megaterium using microscopical, cultural, physiological and molecular tests. According to iron and phosphate solubilizing efficiency test, the most efficient isolate of iron solubilizing bacteria (Pfl3) and P-solubilizin bacteria (Ppu2, Bm14) were selected for biofertilizers preparation Local and imported iron and phosphate biofertilizers were applied in pot experiment. Most biofertilizers were significantly increased yield components of wheat plants. Maximum shoot length, root length, tillers number,1000 seed weight, spike number and yield (99.60cm, 58.95cm, 22, 38.75g. 20, 5.52 ton/ha respectively) were recorded by incoculation with P. Flourence + P. putida +B. megatrium significantly higher than uninoculated control and treatments with imported biofertilizer. It can be concluded that local iron and phosphate solubilizing bacterial isolates can be used for Fe and P biofertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eighteen iron solubilizing bacterial isolates were all identified as Pseudomonas fluorescence.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescencee1symbiont
Outcome
iron solubilizing bacteriae1
Value
eighteene1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“a total of eighteen iron solubilizing bacteria were selected on a modified agar medium and all isolates belonged to Pseudomonas fluorescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–401 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-two phosphate solubilizing bacterial isolates were identified as P. putida, P.fluorescens and Bacillus megaterium.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
P. putidaPseudomonas putidae2symbiont
Second interactor
P.fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense2symbiont
Outcome
phosphate solubilizing bacteriae2
Value
Twenty-twoe2
Qualifier
Bacillus megateriume2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Twenty-two isolates of phosphate solubilizing bacteria were recognized and referred to P. putida, P.fluorescens, and Bacillus megaterium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–539 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Local and imported iron and phosphate biofertilizers significantly increased the yield components of wheat plants in a pot experiment.

Treatment
Local and imported iron and phosphate biofertilizerse3
Outcome
yield componentse3
Direction
increasede3
Setting
pot experimente3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Local and imported iron and phosphate biofertilizers were applied in pot experiment. Most biofertilizers were significantly increased yield components of wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with P. Flourence, P. putida and B. megatrium significantly increased shoot length of wheat compared with the uninoculated control.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
incoculation with P. Flourence + P. putida +B. megatriume4
Interactor
P. Flourencee4symbiont
Second interactor
P. putidaPseudomonas putidae4symbiont
Outcome
shoot lengthe4
Direction
significantly highere4
Value
99.60cme4
Qualifier
B. megatriume4
Comparator
uninoculated controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · Second interactorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Maximum shoot length, root length, tillers number,1000 seed weight, spike number and yield (99.60cm, 58.95cm, 22, 38.75g. 20, 5.52 ton/ha respectively) were recorded by incoculation with P. Flourence + P. putida +B. megatrium significantly higher than uninoculated control and treatments with imported biofertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with P. Flourence, P. putida and B. megatrium significantly increased root length of wheat compared with the uninoculated control.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
incoculation with P. Flourence + P. putida +B. megatriume4
Interactor
P. Flourencee4symbiont
Second interactor
P. putidaPseudomonas putidae4symbiont
Outcome
root lengthe4
Direction
significantly highere4
Value
58.95cme4
Qualifier
B. megatriume4
Comparator
uninoculated controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · Second interactorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Maximum shoot length, root length, tillers number,1000 seed weight, spike number and yield (99.60cm, 58.95cm, 22, 38.75g. 20, 5.52 ton/ha respectively) were recorded by incoculation with P. Flourence + P. putida +B. megatrium significantly higher than uninoculated control and treatments with imported biofertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with P. Flourence, P. putida and B. megatrium significantly increased tiller number of wheat compared with the uninoculated control.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
incoculation with P. Flourence + P. putida +B. megatriume4
Interactor
P. Flourencee4symbiont
Second interactor
P. putidaPseudomonas putidae4symbiont
Outcome
tillers numbere4
Direction
significantly highere4
Value
22e4
Qualifier
B. megatriume4
Comparator
uninoculated controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · Second interactorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Maximum shoot length, root length, tillers number,1000 seed weight, spike number and yield (99.60cm, 58.95cm, 22, 38.75g. 20, 5.52 ton/ha respectively) were recorded by incoculation with P. Flourence + P. putida +B. megatrium significantly higher than uninoculated control and treatments with imported biofertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with P. Flourence, P. putida and B. megatrium significantly increased 1000 seed weight of wheat compared with the uninoculated control.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
incoculation with P. Flourence + P. putida +B. megatriume4
Interactor
P. Flourencee4symbiont
Second interactor
P. putidaPseudomonas putidae4symbiont
Outcome
1000 seed weighte4
Direction
significantly highere4
Value
38.75ge4
Qualifier
B. megatriume4
Comparator
uninoculated controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · Second interactorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Maximum shoot length, root length, tillers number,1000 seed weight, spike number and yield (99.60cm, 58.95cm, 22, 38.75g. 20, 5.52 ton/ha respectively) were recorded by incoculation with P. Flourence + P. putida +B. megatrium significantly higher than uninoculated control and treatments with imported biofertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with P. Flourence, P. putida and B. megatrium significantly increased spike number of wheat compared with the uninoculated control.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
incoculation with P. Flourence + P. putida +B. megatriume4
Interactor
P. Flourencee4symbiont
Second interactor
P. putidaPseudomonas putidae4symbiont
Outcome
spike numbere4
Direction
significantly highere4
Value
20e4
Qualifier
B. megatriume4
Comparator
uninoculated controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · Second interactorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Maximum shoot length, root length, tillers number,1000 seed weight, spike number and yield (99.60cm, 58.95cm, 22, 38.75g. 20, 5.52 ton/ha respectively) were recorded by incoculation with P. Flourence + P. putida +B. megatrium significantly higher than uninoculated control and treatments with imported biofertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with P. Flourence, P. putida and B. megatrium significantly increased yield of wheat compared with the uninoculated control.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
incoculation with P. Flourence + P. putida +B. megatriume4
Interactor
P. Flourencee4symbiont
Second interactor
P. putidaPseudomonas putidae4symbiont
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
significantly highere4
Value
5.52 ton/hae4
Qualifier
B. megatriume4
Comparator
uninoculated controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · Second interactorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Maximum shoot length, root length, tillers number,1000 seed weight, spike number and yield (99.60cm, 58.95cm, 22, 38.75g. 20, 5.52 ton/ha respectively) were recorded by incoculation with P. Flourence + P. putida +B. megatrium significantly higher than uninoculated control and treatments with imported biofertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–108 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Local iron and phosphate solubilizing bacterial isolates can be used for Fe and P biofertilizers.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
can be used for Fe and P biofertilizerse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“It can be concluded that local iron and phosphate solubilizing bacterial isolates can be used for Fe and P biofertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–108 · show in text ↑

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Pseudomonas putida · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Pseudomonas putida · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.