Paper · 2011 · Journal of Plant Interactions

Effect of inoculation with a thermotolerant plant growth promotingPseudomonas putidastrain AKMP7 on growth of wheat (Triticumspp.) under heat stress

Shaik. Zulfikar Ali; Vardharajula Sandhya; Minakshi Grover; et al.

8
claims
21
verbatim quotes
234
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present study was carried out to investigate the effect of plant growth promoting thermotolerant Pseudomonas putida strain AKMP7 on the growth of wheat plants to heat stress. The results indicated the superior performance by P. putida strain AKMP7 in improving survival and growth of wheat plants under heat stress. The bacterium significantly increased the root and shoot length, dry biomass, tiller, spike let and grain formation of wheat over uninoculated plants. Inoculation reduced membrane injury and the activity of several antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, APX and CAT under heat stress. Inoculation improved the levels of cellular metabolites like proline, chlorophyll, sugars, starch, amino acids, and proteins compared to uninoculated plants. Scanning electron microscopy studies confirmed the colonization of the organism on the root surface. This result suggests the possible role of microorganisms in mitigating adverse effects of climate changes on crop growth and may lead to development of microbe based climate- ready technology.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. putida inoculation improved wheat survival under heat stress.

Treatment
P. putida strain AKMP7e0
Interactor
P. putida strain AKMP7Pseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Outcome
survivale0
Direction
improvinge0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. putida strain AKMP7 in improving survival and growth of wheat plants under heat stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–318 · show in text ↑
e1

“over uninoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P. putida inoculation significantly increased wheat root and shoot length and dry biomass under heat stress.

Treatment
P. putida strain AKMP7e1
Interactor
P. putida strain AKMP7Pseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
root and shoot length, dry biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bacterium significantly increased the root and shoot length, dry biomass, tiller, spike let and grain formation of wheat over uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–470 · show in text ↑
e1

“P. putida strain AKMP7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–251 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P. putida inoculation significantly increased wheat tiller, spikelet and grain formation.

Treatment
P. putida strain AKMP7e1
Interactor
P. putida strain AKMP7Pseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
tiller, spike let and grain formatione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bacterium significantly increased the root and shoot length, dry biomass, tiller, spike let and grain formation of wheat over uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–470 · show in text ↑
e1

“P. putida strain AKMP7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–251 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation reduced wheat membrane injury under heat stress.

Treatment
Inoculatione0
Interactor
Pseudomonas putida strain AKMP7Pseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
membrane injurye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inoculation reduced membrane injury and the activity of several antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, APX and CAT under heat stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–598 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pseudomonas putida strain AKMP7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation reduced activity of wheat SOD, APX and CAT under heat stress.

Treatment
Inoculatione0
Interactor
Pseudomonas putida strain AKMP7Pseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Gene
SOD, APX and CATe0
Outcome
activity of several antioxidant enzymese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inoculation reduced membrane injury and the activity of several antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, APX and CAT under heat stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–598 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pseudomonas putida strain AKMP7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation improved wheat proline, chlorophyll and sugar levels over uninoculated plants.

Treatment
Inoculatione0
Interactor
Pseudomonas putida strain AKMP7Pseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
proline, chlorophyll, sugarse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inoculation improved the levels of cellular metabolites like proline, chlorophyll, sugars, starch, amino acids, and proteins compared to uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–756 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pseudomonas putida strain AKMP7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation improved wheat starch, amino acid and protein levels over uninoculated plants.

Treatment
Inoculatione0
Interactor
Pseudomonas putida strain AKMP7Pseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
starch, amino acids, and proteinse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inoculation improved the levels of cellular metabolites like proline, chlorophyll, sugars, starch, amino acids, and proteins compared to uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–756 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pseudomonas putida strain AKMP7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–132 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scanning electron microscopy confirmed bacterial colonization of the wheat root surface.

Organ / stage
root surfacee0
Interactor
Pseudomonas putida strain AKMP7Pseudomonas putidae1symbiont
Outcome
colonization of the organism on the root surfacee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“Scanning electron microscopy studies confirmed the colonization of the organism on the root surface.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–857 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pseudomonas putida strain AKMP7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–132 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas putida · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Pseudomonas putida · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · Pseudomonas putida · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.