Paper · 2010 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

The Effect Of Seed Inoculation (Pseudomonas Putida+Bacillus Lentus) And Different Levels Of Fertilizers On Yield And Yield Components Of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) Cultivars

Abbasdokht, Hamid; Gholami, Ahmad

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

In order to study of The Effect of seed inoculation with Pseudomonas putida+Bacillus lentus on yield and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars, an experiment was carried out as factorial based on Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) in Agricultural Research Station of Shahrood University of Technology. Results showed that inoculation with Pseudomonas putida+Bacillus lentus promoted seed germination. Also, inoculation with Pseudomonas putida+Bacillus lentus significantly affected grain yield, Number of spikes per m2, Number of grain per spike and 1000-seed weight and There was not statistically significant difference between Chamran and Pishtaz cultivars . Finally, the dosages of chemical fertilizers currently applied in commercial wheat field in Iran (Shahrood region) could be reduced through proper combination of Pseudomonas putida+Bacillus lentus inoculation plus fertilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation with Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus lentus promoted wheat germination.

Treatment
inoculation with Pseudomonas putida+Bacillus lentuse0
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Second interactor
Bacillus lentusLederbergia lentae0symbiont
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lederbergia lenta
Lederbergia lenta · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with Pseudomonas putida+Bacillus lentus promoted seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–425 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation significantly affected wheat grain yield and three yield components, with direction unstated.

Treatment
inoculation with Pseudomonas putida+Bacillus lentuse0
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Second interactor
Bacillus lentusLederbergia lentae0symbiont
Outcome
grain yield, Number of spikes per m2, Number of grain per spikee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lederbergia lenta
Lederbergia lenta · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with Pseudomonas putida+Bacillus lentus significantly affected grain yield, Number of spikes per m2, Number of grain per spike and 1000-seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–592 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation significantly affected wheat 1000-seed weight, with direction unstated.

Treatment
inoculation with Pseudomonas putida+Bacillus lentuse0
Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Second interactor
Bacillus lentusLederbergia lentae0symbiont
Outcome
1000-seed weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lederbergia lenta
Lederbergia lenta · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with Pseudomonas putida+Bacillus lentus significantly affected grain yield, Number of spikes per m2, Number of grain per spike and 1000-seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–592 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–153 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chamran and Pishtaz cultivars showed no statistically significant difference.

Material
Chamrane0
Outcome
differencee0
Comparator
Pishtaz cultivarse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was not statistically significant difference between Chamran and Pishtaz cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–685 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–153 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that bacterial inoculation plus fertilization could reduce commercial fertilizer doses.

Interactor
Pseudomonas putidaPseudomonas putidae0symbiont
Second interactor
Bacillus lentusLederbergia lentae0symbiont
Outcome
dosages of chemical fertilizerse0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
Iran (Shahrood region)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas putida
Pseudomonas putida · InteractorMroghair · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lederbergia lenta
Lederbergia lenta · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dosages of chemical fertilizers currently applied in commercial wheat field in Iran (Shahrood region) could be reduced through proper combination of Pseudomonas putida+Bacillus lentus inoculation plus fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–915 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–153 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas putida · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.