Abstract
Two field experiments were conducted at Gemmiza Agricultural Research Station, Agricultural Research Center Gharbia Governorate, Egypt, during 2000 and 2001 seasons. The aim of this investigation is to study the difference between superphosphate application and inoculation with phosphate solubilizing microorganisms (phosphobactrin and vesicular arabuscular mycorrhiza VAM ) on soybean variety Giza 21grOWrl under two levels of soil moisture ( 40 % and 80 % depletion from soil available water). Increasing available soil moisture content caused significant increases in number of seeds per plant , seed weight per plant, seed yield ton per feddan , number of seeds per pod and maturity date in first season , while in second season it caused significant increases for number of pods, seeds , seed weight per plant and maturity date. So it caused significant increases for protein and phosphorus percentages. The inoc!:lla~ion by phosphobactrin , VAM and superphosphate application caused significant increases for all characters in both seasons except number of seeds per pod . (Table 3). The inoculation by phosphobactrin solid, micorrhiza solid , . phosphobactrin with superphosphate and micorrhiza with superphosphate caused significantincreases for characters number of branches , pods , seeds , seed weight per plant and seed yield ton per feddan in both seasons. Inoculation by mycorrhiza with 22 P2 05 gave the highest values of seed yield ton per feddan (1.830 - 1.850 tonlf~d.) compared to (1.100 - 1.187 ton/fed. of control in the first season, while in the second season gave (1.730 -1,747 ton/fed.) compared to (1.007 -1.160 ton/fed.) for control. So inoculation by mycorrhiza and superphosphate caused increases of protein percentage (41.40 % compared to 37.84 % for control and increases of phosphor percentage in seeds 0.62 % compared to 0.30 % of control. The available phosphorus in soil was higher by VAM inoculation than phosphobactrin inoculation and phosphorus application at rate of 22 P2 051 fed. Therefore it is recommended to inoculate the soil with VAM and phosphobactrin and decrease the phosphorus application doses or use rock phosphate to decrease the costs with soil moisture for field capacity to 40 % depletion from available soil water.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Greater available soil moisture significantly increased seed and pod yield components and maturity date in soybean.
- Taxon
- SOYBEAN
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- Increasing available soil moisture contente0
- Outcome
- number of seeds per plant , seed weight per plant, seed yield ton per feddane0
- Direction
- increasese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOYBEAN (Glycine max L.)”
e0“Increasing available soil moisture content caused significant increases in number of seeds per plant , seed weight per plant, seed yield ton per feddan , number of seeds per pod and maturity date in first season , while in second season it caused significant increases for number of pods, seeds , seed weight per plant and maturity date.”
Claim · model-written summary
Greater available soil moisture significantly increased seed protein and phosphorus percentages.
- Taxon
- SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- Increasing available soil moisture contente0
- Outcome
- protein and phosphorus percentagese1
- Direction
- increasese1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOYBEAN (Glycine max L.)”
e0“Increasing available soil moisture content caused significant increases”
e1“So it caused significant increases for protein and phosphorus percentages.”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphobactrin inoculation significantly increased most measured soybean characters in both seasons.
- Taxon
- SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- phosphobactrine0
- Interactor
- phosphobactrine0symbiont
- Outcome
- all characters in both seasons except number of seeds per pode0
- Direction
- increasese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOYBEAN (Glycine max L.)”
e0“The inoc!:lla~ion by phosphobactrin , VAM and superphosphate application caused significant increases for all characters in both seasons except number of seeds per pod .”
Claim · model-written summary
VAM inoculation significantly increased most measured soybean characters in both seasons.
- Taxon
- SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- VAMe0
- Interactor
- VAMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- all characters in both seasons except number of seeds per pode0
- Direction
- increasese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOYBEAN (Glycine max L.)”
e0“The inoc!:lla~ion by phosphobactrin , VAM and superphosphate application caused significant increases for all characters in both seasons except number of seeds per pod .”
Claim · model-written summary
Superphosphate application significantly increased most measured soybean characters in both seasons.
- Taxon
- SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- superphosphate applicatione0
- Outcome
- all characters in both seasons except number of seeds per pode0
- Direction
- increasese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOYBEAN (Glycine max L.)”
e0“The inoc!:lla~ion by phosphobactrin , VAM and superphosphate application caused significant increases for all characters in both seasons except number of seeds per pod .”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhiza with phosphate gave the highest soybean seed yield, 1.830 - 1.850 tonlf~d. in the first season.
- Taxon
- SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- mycorrhiza with 22 P2 05e0
- Interactor
- mycorrhizae0symbiont
- Outcome
- seed yield ton per feddane0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.830 - 1.850 tonlf~d.e0
- Qualifier
- 1.100 - 1.187 ton/fed.e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOYBEAN (Glycine max L.)”
e0“Inoculation by mycorrhiza with 22 P2 05 gave the highest values of seed yield ton per feddan (1.830 - 1.850 tonlf~d.) compared to (1.100 - 1.187 ton/fed. of control in the first season”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhiza with phosphate gave soybean seed yield of 1.730 -1,747 ton/fed. in the second season, above control.
- Taxon
- SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- mycorrhiza with 22 P2 05e0
- Interactor
- mycorrhizae0symbiont
- Outcome
- seed yield ton per feddane0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.730 -1,747 ton/fed.e1
- Qualifier
- 1.007 -1.160 ton/fed.e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOYBEAN (Glycine max L.)”
e0“Inoculation by mycorrhiza with 22 P2 05 gave the highest values of seed yield ton per feddan”
e1“in the second season gave (1.730 -1,747 ton/fed.) compared to (1.007 -1.160 ton/fed.) for control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhiza and superphosphate raised soybean seed protein percentage to 41.40 % versus 37.84 % in control.
- Taxon
- SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- mycorrhiza and superphosphatee0
- Interactor
- mycorrhizae0symbiont
- Outcome
- protein percentagee0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 41.40 %e0
- Qualifier
- 37.84 %e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOYBEAN (Glycine max L.)”
e0“inoculation by mycorrhiza and superphosphate caused increases of protein percentage (41.40 % compared to 37.84 % for control”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhiza and superphosphate raised soybean seed phosphorus percentage to 0.62 % versus 0.30 % in control.
- Taxon
- SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- mycorrhiza and superphosphatee0
- Interactor
- mycorrhizae0symbiont
- Outcome
- phosphor percentage in seedse1
- Direction
- increasese1
- Value
- 0.62 %e1
- Qualifier
- 0.30 %e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOYBEAN (Glycine max L.)”
e0“inoculation by mycorrhiza and superphosphate caused increases of protein percentage”
e1“increases of phosphor percentage in seeds 0.62 % compared to 0.30 % of control.”
Claim · model-written summary
VAM inoculation gave higher available soil phosphorus than phosphobactrin inoculation or phosphorus application.
- Taxon
- SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- VAM inoculatione0
- Interactor
- VAMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- available phosphorus in soile0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- phosphobactrin inoculation and phosphorus applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOYBEAN (Glycine max L.)”
e0“The available phosphorus in soil was higher by VAM inoculation than phosphobactrin inoculation and phosphorus application at rate of 22 P2 051 fed.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend VAM and phosphobactrin inoculation with lower phosphorus doses or rock phosphate at 40 % available-water depletion.
- Taxon
- SOYBEANGlycine maxt0
- Interactor
- VAMe0symbiont
- Second interactor
- phosphobactrine0symbiont
- Outcome
- inoculate the soil with VAM and phosphobactrin and decrease the phosphorus application doses or use rock phosphatee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SOYBEAN (Glycine max L.)”
e0“it is recommended to inoculate the soil with VAM and phosphobactrin and decrease the phosphorus application doses or use rock phosphate to decrease the costs with soil moisture for field capacity to 40 % depletion from available soil water.”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · quality: protein · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →soil water · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →soil water · quality: protein · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
inoculation · soil: chemistry · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →mycorrhiza · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
75 papers more in this group
See all 79 papers →phosphorus · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
120 papers more in this group
See all 124 papers →phosphorus · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
302 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
351 papers more in this group
See all 355 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.