Abstract
Objective of this study was to assess the inoculation effect of actinobacterial, rhizobium and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria consortium on rhizosphere soil properties in the soybean. For this study, two isolates of each Actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR microbial inoculants as mono-inoculation and their combination as co-inoculation which proved to be highly efficient in initial screenings under controlled conditions in soybean under glass house conditions were further used for evaluation under field conditions having Vertisol type of soil. Actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR Consortium showed significant difference in improving plant growth attributes and yield components of soybean at different growth stages. Among the microbial inoculants tested Actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR Consortium inoculated plants showed higher N, P and K uptake (206, 13 and 101 kg /ha, respectively) and there was no significant difference with respect to soil pH, EC and organic carbon content in soils after crop harvest of soybean. In soils after crop harvest actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR consortium recorded the highest available N, P and K 239, 16.6 and 302 kg /ha, respectively). This inoculants also recorded higher population of bacteria (36.5 x 105cfu g /soil) fungi (20.6 x 103cfu g /soil) and Actinomycetes (Bacillus sp.) (15.4 x105cfu g /soil). Among the mono and co-inoculation, co-inoculation of Actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR Consortium were found best for improving the yield of soybean and also soil health.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR consortium significantly improved soybean growth attributes and yield components
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- Actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR Consortiume0
- Interactor
- ActinobacteriaActinomycetotae0symbiont
- Outcome
- plant growth attributes and yield componentse0
- Direction
- improvinge0
RhizobiumNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“in soybean”
e0“Actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR Consortium showed significant difference in improving plant growth attributes and yield components of soybean at different growth stages”
Claim · model-written summary
Consortium-inoculated soybean showed higher N uptake, 206 kg/ha
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- Actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR Consortiume1
- Interactor
- ActinobacteriaActinomycetotae1symbiont
- Outcome
- uptakee1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 206e1
- Qualifier
- Ne1
- Comparator
- microbial inoculants testede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“in soybean”
e1“Among the microbial inoculants tested Actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR Consortium inoculated plants showed higher N, P and K uptake (206, 13 and 101 kg /ha, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Consortium-inoculated soybean showed higher P uptake, 13 kg/ha
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- Actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR Consortiume1
- Interactor
- ActinobacteriaActinomycetotae1symbiont
- Outcome
- uptakee1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 13e1
- Qualifier
- Pe1
- Comparator
- microbial inoculants testede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“in soybean”
e1“Among the microbial inoculants tested Actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR Consortium inoculated plants showed higher N, P and K uptake (206, 13 and 101 kg /ha, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Consortium-inoculated soybean showed higher K uptake, 101 kg/ha
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- Actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR Consortiume1
- Interactor
- ActinobacteriaActinomycetotae1symbiont
- Outcome
- uptakee1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 101 kg /hae1
- Qualifier
- Ke1
- Comparator
- microbial inoculants testede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“in soybean”
e1“Among the microbial inoculants tested Actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR Consortium inoculated plants showed higher N, P and K uptake (206, 13 and 101 kg /ha, respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Consortium inoculation did not significantly change soil pH, EC or organic carbon after soybean harvest
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- Actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR Consortiume1
- Interactor
- ActinobacteriaActinomycetotae1symbiont
- Outcome
- soil pH, EC and organic carbon contente2
- Direction
- no significant differencee2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“in soybean”
e1“Among the microbial inoculants tested Actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR Consortium inoculated plants showed higher N, P and K uptake (206, 13 and 101 kg /ha, respectively)”
e2“there was no significant difference with respect to soil pH, EC and organic carbon content in soils after crop harvest of soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Consortium gave the highest available N in soil after harvest, 239 kg/ha
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR consortiume3
- Interactor
- actinobacteriaActinomycetotae3symbiont
- Outcome
- availablee3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 239e3
- Qualifier
- Ne3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“in soybean”
e3“In soils after crop harvest actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR consortium recorded the highest available N, P and K 239, 16.6 and 302 kg /ha, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Consortium gave the highest available P in soil after harvest, 16.6 kg/ha
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR consortiume3
- Interactor
- actinobacteriaActinomycetotae3symbiont
- Outcome
- availablee3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 16.6e3
- Qualifier
- Pe3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“in soybean”
e3“In soils after crop harvest actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR consortium recorded the highest available N, P and K 239, 16.6 and 302 kg /ha, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Consortium gave the highest available K in soil after harvest, 302 kg/ha
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR consortiume3
- Interactor
- actinobacteriaActinomycetotae3symbiont
- Outcome
- availablee3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 302 kg /hae3
- Qualifier
- Ke3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“in soybean”
e3“In soils after crop harvest actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR consortium recorded the highest available N, P and K 239, 16.6 and 302 kg /ha, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Consortium-treated soil had higher bacterial population, 36.5 x 10^5 cfu/g
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Outcome
- populatione4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 36.5 x 105cfu g /soile4
- Qualifier
- bacteriae4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“in soybean”
e4“This inoculants also recorded higher population of bacteria (36.5 x 105cfu g /soil) fungi (20.6 x 103cfu g /soil) and Actinomycetes (Bacillus sp.) (15.4 x105cfu g /soil)”
Claim · model-written summary
Consortium-treated soil had higher fungal population, 20.6 x 10^3 cfu/g
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Outcome
- populatione4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 20.6 x 103cfu g /soile4
- Qualifier
- fungie4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“in soybean”
e4“This inoculants also recorded higher population of bacteria (36.5 x 105cfu g /soil) fungi (20.6 x 103cfu g /soil) and Actinomycetes (Bacillus sp.) (15.4 x105cfu g /soil)”
Claim · model-written summary
Consortium-treated soil had higher actinomycete population, 15.4 x 10^5 cfu/g
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Outcome
- populatione4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 15.4 x105cfu g /soile4
- Qualifier
- Actinomycetes (Bacillus sp.)e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“in soybean”
e4“This inoculants also recorded higher population of bacteria (36.5 x 105cfu g /soil) fungi (20.6 x 103cfu g /soil) and Actinomycetes (Bacillus sp.) (15.4 x105cfu g /soil)”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation with the consortium was best for soybean yield and soil health
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- co-inoculation of Actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR Consortiume5
- Interactor
- ActinobacteriaActinomycetotae5symbiont
- Outcome
- yield of soybean and also soil healthe5
- Direction
- beste5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“in soybean”
e5“co-inoculation of Actinobacteria, Rhizobium and PGPR Consortium were found best for improving the yield of soybean and also soil health”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
88 papers more in this group
See all 92 papers →Rhizobium · soil: chemistry · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →inoculation · soil: chemistry · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
19 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
169 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
175 papers more in this group
See all 179 papers →inoculation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
490 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
562 papers more in this group
See all 566 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.