Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Microbiology

High bacterial diversity and siderophore-producing bacteria collectively suppress Fusarium oxysporum in maize/faba bean intercropping

Xinzhan Sun; Chaochun Zhang; Shuikuan Bei; et al.

16
claims
31
verbatim quotes
37
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Beyond interacting with neighboring plants, crop performance is affected by the microbiome that includes pathogens and mutualists. While the importance of plant–plant interactions in explaining overyielding in intercropping is well known, the role of the microbiome, in particular how the presence of microbes from heterospecific crop species inhibit pathogens of the focal plants in affecting yield remains hardly explored. Here we performed both field samplings and pot experiments to investigate the microbial interactions in the maize/faba bean intercropping system, with the focus on the inhibition of Fusarium oxysporum in faba bean plants. Long-term field measurements show that maize/faba bean intercropping increased crop yield, reduced the gene copies of F. oxysporum by 30–84% and increased bacterial richness and Shannon index compared to monocropping. Bacterial networks in intercropping were more stable with more hub nodes than the respective monocultures. Furthermore, the observed changes of whole microbial communities were aligned with differences in the number of siderophore-producing rhizobacteria in maize and pathogen abundances in faba bean. Maize possessed 71% more siderophore-producing rhizobacteria and 33% more synthetases genes abundance of nonribosomal peptides, especially pyochelin, relative to faba bean. This was further evidenced by the increased numbers of siderophore-producing bacteria and decreased gene copies of F. oxysporum in the rhizosphere of intercropped faba bean. Four bacteria ( Pseudomonas spp. B004 and B021, Bacillus spp. B005 and B208) from 95 isolates antagonized F. oxysporum f. sp. fabae . In particular, B005, which represented a hub node in the networks, showed particularly high siderophore-producing capabilities. Intercropping increased overall bacterial diversity and network complexity and the abundance of siderophore-producing bacteria, leading to facilitated pathogen suppression and increased resistance of faba bean to F. oxysporum . This study has great agronomic implications as microorganisms might be specifically targeted to optimize intercropping practices in the future.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize/faba bean intercropping increased crop yield relative to monocropping.

Taxon
maize/faba beanVicia fabaZea mayst0
Treatment
maize/faba bean intercroppinge0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
monocroppinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize/faba bean intercropping increased crop yield, reduced the gene copies of F. oxysporum by 30–84%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–787 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to monocropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize/faba bean intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize/faba bean intercropping reduced the gene copies of F. oxysporum by 30–84% relative to monocropping.

Taxon
maize/faba beanVicia fabaZea mayst0
Treatment
maize/faba bean intercroppinge0
Interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
gene copies of F. oxysporume0
Direction
reducede0
Value
30–84%e0
Comparator
monocroppinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize/faba bean intercropping increased crop yield, reduced the gene copies of F. oxysporum by 30–84%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–787 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to monocropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize/faba bean intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize/faba bean intercropping increased bacterial richness and Shannon index relative to monocropping.

Taxon
maize/faba beanVicia fabaZea mayst0
Treatment
maize/faba bean intercroppinge1
Outcome
bacterial richness and Shannon indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
monocroppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased bacterial richness and Shannon index compared to monocropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–863 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize/faba bean intercropping increased crop yield, reduced the gene copies of F. oxysporum by 30–84%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize/faba bean intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial networks in maize/faba bean intercropping were more stable than those in the respective monocultures.

Taxon
maize/faba beanVicia fabaZea mayst0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
Bacterial networkse0
Direction
more stablee0
Comparator
the respective monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial networks in intercropping were more stable with more hub nodes than the respective monocultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–970 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize/faba bean intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial networks in maize/faba bean intercropping had more hub nodes than those in the respective monocultures.

Taxon
maize/faba beanVicia fabaZea mayst0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
hub nodese0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
the respective monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial networks in intercropping were more stable with more hub nodes than the respective monocultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–970 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize/faba bean intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize possessed 71% more siderophore-producing rhizobacteria than faba bean.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Outcome
siderophore-producing rhizobacteriae0
Direction
moree0
Value
71%e0
Comparator
faba beane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize possessed 71% more siderophore-producing rhizobacteria and 33% more synthetases genes abundance of nonribosomal peptides, especially pyochelin, relative to faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1338 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize possessed 33% more synthetase gene abundance for nonribosomal peptides than faba bean, especially for pyochelin.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Gene
synthetasese0
Outcome
synthetases genes abundance of nonribosomal peptidese0
Direction
moree0
Value
33%e0
Qualifier
especially pyocheline0
Comparator
faba beane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize possessed 71% more siderophore-producing rhizobacteria and 33% more synthetases genes abundance of nonribosomal peptides, especially pyochelin, relative to faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1338 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changes of whole microbial communities were aligned with differences in siderophore-producing rhizobacteria in maize and pathogen abundances in faba bean.

Taxon
maize/faba beanVicia fabaZea mayst0
Interactor
siderophore-producing rhizobacteriae0other
Outcome
changes of whole microbial communitiese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the observed changes of whole microbial communities were aligned with differences in the number of siderophore-producing rhizobacteria in maize and pathogen abundances in faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1165 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize/faba bean intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased the numbers of siderophore-producing bacteria in the rhizosphere of faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Organ / stage
rhizospheree0
Treatment
intercroppede0
Outcome
numbers of siderophore-producing bacteriae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was further evidenced by the increased numbers of siderophore-producing bacteria and decreased gene copies of F. oxysporum in the rhizosphere of intercropped faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping decreased gene copies of F. oxysporum in the rhizosphere of faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Organ / stage
rhizospheree0
Treatment
intercroppede0
Interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
gene copies of F. oxysporume0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was further evidenced by the increased numbers of siderophore-producing bacteria and decreased gene copies of F. oxysporum in the rhizosphere of intercropped faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1512 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four of 95 bacterial isolates antagonized F. oxysporum f. sp. fabae.

Taxon
maize/faba beanVicia fabaZea mayst0
Interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas spp. B004 and B021, Bacillus spp. B005 and B208e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
antagonized F. oxysporume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four bacteria ( Pseudomonas spp. B004 and B021, Bacillus spp. B005 and B208) from 95 isolates antagonized F. oxysporum f. sp. fabae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1645 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize/faba bean intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterium B005 represented a hub node in the bacterial networks.

Taxon
maize/faba beanVicia fabaZea mayst0
Material
B005e0
Outcome
hub node in the networkse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In particular, B005, which represented a hub node in the networks, showed particularly high siderophore-producing capabilities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1648–1774 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize/faba bean intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterium B005 showed particularly high siderophore-producing capabilities.

Taxon
maize/faba beanVicia fabaZea mayst0
Material
B005e0
Outcome
siderophore-producing capabilitiese0
Direction
particularly highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In particular, B005, which represented a hub node in the networks, showed particularly high siderophore-producing capabilities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1648–1774 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize/faba bean intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased overall bacterial diversity and network complexity.

Taxon
maize/faba beanVicia fabaZea mayst0
Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
overall bacterial diversity and network complexitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping increased overall bacterial diversity and network complexity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1776–1850 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize/faba bean intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased the abundance of siderophore-producing bacteria.

Taxon
maize/faba beanVicia fabaZea mayst0
Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
abundance of siderophore-producing bacteriae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping increased overall bacterial diversity and network complexity and the abundance of siderophore-producing bacteria, leading to facilitated pathogen suppression and increased resistance of faba bean to F. oxysporum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1776–2001 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize/faba bean intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased resistance of faba bean to F. oxysporum, which the authors link to facilitated pathogen suppression.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
resistance of faba bean to F. oxysporume0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping increased overall bacterial diversity and network complexity and the abundance of siderophore-producing bacteria, leading to facilitated pathogen suppression and increased resistance of faba bean to F. oxysporum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1776–2001 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize/faba bean intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑

Vicia faba · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Zea mays · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

intercropping · pest · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

intercropping · ecology: diversity · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

intercropping · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 31 positive, 7 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

intercropping · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 59 positive, 14 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

612 papers in the same direction as this paper · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

intercropping · ecology: diversity · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.