Paper · 2018 · Egyptian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of Corps Rotation and Sequence Weed Control Treatments on Weeds and Faba Bean Productivity

Adel Fakkar; Yasser Mohamed

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

CROP rotation is thought to reduce weed density, hence preventing the domination of some weeds problem. Variance in weed population between cropping systems may be the direct result of crop rotation. Two rotation experiments in a long - term study were carried out at Shandaweel Res. St., Sohag Governorate in Upper Egypt from 2014/15, 2015/16 and 2016/17 winter seasons. The area used for agriculture has not changed over the three seasons. Plots were not changed in every treatment in the sense that all experimental pieces received the same treatment in the three seasons of summer and winter.Results showed that of crop rotation system (Faba bean/maize/faba bean/maize) gave the height effect in decreased on number and weight of grassy, broad-leaved and total weeds and increased weight of pods, weight of seeds/plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield (arad/fad) compared with (Faba bean/peanut/faba bean/peanut) in seasons 2014/15,2015/16 and 2016/17, respectively. Gradually increased the weight of pods and seeds/plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield (arad/fad) from season to season using of herbicide or hand hoeing compared with control.Significant positive correlation values were detected between the number and weight of all weeds spices in both seasons. A correlation value was negative between the number and weight of weeds and seed yield (ard/fad) and 100-seed weight but a correlation value was positive between yield and it’s components.Economic evaluation of the results indicated that using crop rotation system (Faba bean/maize/faba bean/maize) gave the highest economic values in the average of three seasons for all economic evaluation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The faba bean–maize rotation reduced weed number and weight relative to the faba bean–peanut rotation.

Taxon
Faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Faba bean/maize/faba bean/maizee0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
number and weight of grassy, broad-leaved and total weedse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
Faba bean/peanut/faba bean/peanute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop rotation system (Faba bean/maize/faba bean/maize) gave the height effect in decreased on number and weight of grassy, broad-leaved and total weeds and increased weight of pods, weight of seeds/plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield (arad/fad) compared with (Faba bean/peanut/faba bean/peanut)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The faba bean–maize rotation raised pod weight, seed weight per plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield.

Taxon
Faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Faba bean/maize/faba bean/maizee0
Outcome
weight of pods, weight of seeds/plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield (arad/fad)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
Faba bean/peanut/faba bean/peanute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop rotation system (Faba bean/maize/faba bean/maize) gave the height effect in decreased on number and weight of grassy, broad-leaved and total weeds and increased weight of pods, weight of seeds/plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield (arad/fad) compared with (Faba bean/peanut/faba bean/peanut)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide increased pod and seed weights and seed yield across seasons compared with control.

Taxon
Faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
herbicidee0
Outcome
weight of pods and seeds/plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield (arad/fad)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gradually increased the weight of pods and seeds/plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield (arad/fad) from season to season using of herbicide or hand hoeing compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand hoeing increased pod and seed weights and seed yield across seasons compared with control.

Taxon
Faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
hand hoeinge0
Outcome
weight of pods and seeds/plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield (arad/fad)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gradually increased the weight of pods and seeds/plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield (arad/fad) from season to season using of herbicide or hand hoeing compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed number and weight were significantly positively correlated.

Taxon
Faba beanVicia fabat0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
number and weight of all weeds spicese0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant positive correlation values were detected between the number and weight of all weeds spices in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed abundance and weight were negatively correlated with bean seed yield and 100-seed weight.

Taxon
Faba beanVicia fabat0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
seed yield (ard/fad) and 100-seed weighte0
Direction
negativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A correlation value was negative between the number and weight of weeds and seed yield (ard/fad) and 100-seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield was positively correlated with its components.

Taxon
Faba beanVicia fabat0
Organ / stage
Faba Beant0
Outcome
yield and it’s componentse0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a correlation value was positive between yield and it’s components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The faba bean–maize rotation had the highest average economic values across three seasons.

Taxon
Faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Faba bean/maize/faba bean/maizee0
Outcome
economic valuese0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
average of three seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using crop rotation system (Faba bean/maize/faba bean/maize) gave the highest economic values in the average of three seasons for all economic evaluation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1659 · show in text ↑

Zea mays · weed · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Zea mays · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

herbicide · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 32 positive, 6 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.