Paper · 2017 · Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences

Effect of Intercropping Three Faba Bean Varieties with Sugar Beet Plants on Piercing Sucking Insect Pests and Associated Natural Enemies Under Ridge Space and Seedling Rates in Relation Crop Yield.

Hamdany KH.; M. Aassar

15
claims
23
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiment were conducted at Gemmiza Agricultural research Station, El Gharbia Governorate, Egypt, in 2014/2015and 2015/2016 seasons to study the effect of intercropping faba bean (Vicia faba L.) with sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) at different ridge width 60, 90 and 120 cm and seedling rats on the population densities of piercing sucking insect pests and their effect on the productivity of both crops and estimate the economic return. Results was indicated that the intercropping of broad bean at 60cm ridge space with sugar beet harbored the lowest piercing sucking pest infestations. However, Giza 3 improve at 120 cm ridge space was received the highest infestation. On the other hand, Giza 716 was infested by highest infestation at 37.5% seed rates when intercropping with sugar beet. The lost infestation was recorded on sugar beet + Giza 3 improve with 12.5% seed rates. Statistical analysis was showed the intercropping faba been with sugar beet on different ridge width significantly affected on sugar beet yield and yield components. Increasing sugar beet root length and purity % by planting on 60 cm ridge width, compared to 90 and 120 cm. On the other hand, root diameter, root fresh weight, top fresh weight, root yield/fed, top yield/fed T.S.S and sucrose were significantly increased by increasing ridge width from 60 to 120 cm. The effect of ridge width on faba bean traits revealed that increasing ridge width from 60 cm to 120 cm reduced plant height only of faba bean. On the other hand, number of pods/ plant, seeds/plant, weight of 100 seeds and grain yield /fed ardab were increased by increasing ridge width from 60 cm to 120 cm , while Protein content% was not affected by ridge width. Increasing seeding rates from 12.5 % to 37.5 % increased plant height and straw yield/ fed. The differences among faba bean varieties indicated that only plant height and number of seeds/ plant were affected by faba bean varieties. On the other hand, all the other characters were affected by faba bean varieties. highest values of Land equivalent ratio (LER), Farmer,s benefit (Total return of intercropping culture , Net profit fed-1 ) and Monetary advantage index (MAI) compared with other treatments . It could be concluded that intercropping 100 % sugar beet + 37.5 % faba bean Giza 3 improve cultivar (52500 plants / fed) on ridge width 120 cm gave the greatest values for all treatments which gave the maximum yield benefits and least competition between component crops compared with other treatments .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba bean intercropped with sugar beet at 60 cm ridge spacing had the lowest piercing-sucking pest infestation.

Taxon
broad beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
intercropping of broad bean at 60cm ridge space with sugar beete0
Interactor
piercing sucking peste0pest
Outcome
piercing sucking pest infestationse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the intercropping of broad bean at 60cm ridge space with sugar beet harbored the lowest piercing sucking pest infestations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–594 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 3 improve at 120 cm ridge spacing had the highest pest infestation.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Giza 3 improvee0
Treatment
120 cm ridge spacee0
Outcome
infestatione0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giza 3 improve at 120 cm ridge space was received the highest infestation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 716 at a 37.5% seed rate had the highest infestation when intercropped with sugar beet.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Giza 716e0
Treatment
37.5% seed ratese0
Outcome
infestatione0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giza 716 was infested by highest infestation at 37.5% seed rates when intercropping with sugar beet.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet intercropped with Giza 3 improve at a 12.5% seed rate had the lowest infestation.

Material
Giza 3 improvee0
Treatment
12.5% seed ratese0
Outcome
infestatione0
Direction
loste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lost infestation was recorded on sugar beet + Giza 3 improve with 12.5% seed rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge width significantly affected sugar beet yield and yield components under intercropping.

Treatment
different ridge widthe0
Outcome
sugar beet yield and yield componentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping faba been with sugar beet on different ridge width significantly affected on sugar beet yield and yield components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60 cm ridge width, sugar beet root length and purity increased relative to 90 and 120 cm.

Treatment
60 cm ridge widthe0
Outcome
root length and purity %e0
Direction
Increasinge0
Comparator
90 and 120 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing sugar beet root length and purity % by planting on 60 cm ridge width, compared to 90 and 120 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing ridge width from 60 to 120 cm increased sugar beet root diameter, root and top fresh weight, and root and top yield.

Treatment
increasing ridge width from 60 to 120 cme0
Outcome
root diameter, root fresh weight, top fresh weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
60e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root diameter, root fresh weight, top fresh weight, root yield/fed, top yield/fed T.S.S and sucrose were significantly increased by increasing ridge width from 60 to 120 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing ridge width from 60 to 120 cm increased sugar beet total soluble solids and sucrose.

Treatment
increasing ridge width from 60 to 120 cme0
Outcome
T.S.S and sucrosee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
60e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root diameter, root fresh weight, top fresh weight, root yield/fed, top yield/fed T.S.S and sucrose were significantly increased by increasing ridge width from 60 to 120 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing ridge width from 60 to 120 cm reduced faba bean plant height.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
increasing ridge width from 60 cm to 120 cme0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
60 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing ridge width from 60 cm to 120 cm reduced plant height only of faba bean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing ridge width from 60 to 120 cm raised faba bean pod and seed number and hundred-seed weight.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
increasing ridge width from 60 cm to 120 cme0
Outcome
number of pods/ plant, seeds/plant, weight of 100 seedse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
60 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of pods/ plant, seeds/plant, weight of 100 seeds and grain yield /fed ardab were increased by increasing ridge width from 60 cm to 120 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1517–1661 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing ridge width from 60 to 120 cm raised faba bean grain yield.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
increasing ridge width from 60 cm to 120 cme0
Outcome
grain yield /fed ardabe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
60 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield /fed ardab were increased by increasing ridge width from 60 cm to 120 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1661 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge width did not affect faba bean protein content.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
ridge widthe0
Outcome
Protein content%e0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content% was not affected by ridge width.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing faba bean seeding rate from 12.5% to 37.5% increased plant height and straw yield.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
seeding rates from 12.5 % to 37.5 %e0
Outcome
plant height and straw yield/ fede0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
12.5 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing seeding rates from 12.5 % to 37.5 % increased plant height and straw yield/ fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1720–1811 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba bean varieties differed in plant height and seed number per plant.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Material
faba bean varietiese0
Outcome
plant height and number of seeds/ plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height and number of seeds/ plant were affected by faba bean varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1874–1951 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% sugar beet plus 37.5% Giza 3 improve faba bean treatment at 120 cm had the greatest yield benefits and least crop competition.

Taxon
sugar beet + 37.5 % faba beane0
Material
Giza 3 improve cultivare0
Treatment
intercropping 100 % sugar beet + 37.5 % faba bean Giza 3 improve cultivar (52500 plants / fed) on ridge width 120 cme0
Outcome
maximum yield benefits and least competitione0

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping 100 % sugar beet + 37.5 % faba bean Giza 3 improve cultivar (52500 plants / fed) on ridge width 120 cm gave the greatest values for all treatments which gave the maximum yield benefits and least competition between component crops compared with other treatments .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2253–2530 · show in text ↑

intercropping · pest · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

density · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 41 positive, 16 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.