Paper · 2018 · Journal of Productivity and Development

EFFECT OF IRRIGATION LEVELS WITH FOLIAR SPRAY OF SILICON, CALCIUM AND AMINO ACIDS ON "THOMPSON SEEDLESS" GRAPEVINES. I. YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY

Bassiony, Saber; Zaghloul, Ali; Abd El-Aziz, Maha

12
claims
27
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study was conducted during two growing seasons of 2016 and 2017 to evaluate the potential effects of different irrigation levels (30, 50 and 70% depleted of available soil water) after fruit set as well as four foliar applications of Control, Silicon spray at 1.5 g/L, Calcium nitrate at 1 g/L and Amino acids at 2 ml/L, which sprayed at 15-20 cm of shoot length and the second one after fruit set, then these were continuous every two weeks till veraison stage on yield and fruit quality of "Thompson seedless" (Vitis vinifera L.) grapevines grown in clay soil under flow irrigation system in El-Mahalla, Gharbia Governorate. The obtained results revealed that, vines irrigated at 30and 50% depleted from soil available water showed a significant increase in yield and fruit quality compared with 70% depleted from soil available water. The results cleared that, all foliar applications enhancing in all clusters and berries quality, especially with the use of amino acids sprays on cluster (weight and length) and berry (length, diameter and weight of 100 berries). Vines irrigated with 30 and 50% depleted from soil available water in combined with amino acids sprays showed a significant increase in yield and cluster characters (weight, length and number) and berry characters in terms of firmness, removal force, weight and volume of 100 berries. Moreover, foliar spray with calcium as well as silicon was very effective in reducing percentages of berries decay, cracking, wrinkled and berries shatter under all irrigation levels. However, the irrigation at 50% depleted from soil available water level increased berry SSC% and SSC/acid ratio and slightly decreased berry acidity%. Conclusively, the productivity of irrigation water was enhanced in vines irrigated at 50% depleted from soil available water, recommend it can reduce water irrigation by about 50% without losses in total yield with maintaining cluster and berry quality of "Thompson seedless" grape.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vines irrigated at 30 and 50% depletion of available soil water showed a significant increase in yield and fruit quality compared with 70% depletion.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
irrigated at 30and 50% depleted from soil available watere0
Outcome
yield and fruit qualitye0
Direction
significant increasee0
Comparator
70% depleted from soil available watere0

Verbatim

t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“vines irrigated at 30and 50% depleted from soil available water showed a significant increase in yield and fruit quality compared with 70% depleted from soil available water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All foliar applications enhanced cluster and berry quality compared with the control.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
foliar applicationse0
Outcome
clusters and berries qualitye0
Direction
enhancinge0
Comparator
Controle1

Verbatim

t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“all foliar applications enhancing in all clusters and berries quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–938 · show in text ↑
e1

“four foliar applications of Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid sprays especially enhanced cluster weight and length.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
amino acids sprayse0
Outcome
cluster (weight and length)e0
Direction
enhancinge0
Comparator
Controle1

Verbatim

t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“enhancing in all clusters and berries quality, especially with the use of amino acids sprays on cluster (weight and length) and berry (length, diameter and weight of 100 berries)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1071 · show in text ↑
e1

“four foliar applications of Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid sprays especially enhanced berry length, diameter and weight of 100 berries.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
amino acids sprayse0
Outcome
berry (length, diameter and weight of 100 berries)e0
Direction
enhancinge0
Comparator
Controle1

Verbatim

t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“enhancing in all clusters and berries quality, especially with the use of amino acids sprays on cluster (weight and length) and berry (length, diameter and weight of 100 berries)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1071 · show in text ↑
e1

“four foliar applications of Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 30 and 50% depletion combined with amino acid sprays gave a significant increase in yield and cluster weight, length and number.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
30 and 50% depleted from soil available water in combined with amino acids sprayse0
Outcome
yield and cluster characters (weight, length and number)e0
Direction
significant increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“Vines irrigated with 30 and 50% depleted from soil available water in combined with amino acids sprays showed a significant increase in yield and cluster characters (weight, length and number)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 30 and 50% depletion combined with amino acid sprays gave a significant increase in berry firmness, removal force, and weight and volume of 100 berries.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
30 and 50% depleted from soil available water in combined with amino acids sprayse0
Outcome
berry characters in terms of firmness, removal force, weight and volume of 100 berriese0
Direction
significant increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“Vines irrigated with 30 and 50% depleted from soil available water in combined with amino acids sprays showed a significant increase in yield and cluster characters (weight, length and number) and berry characters in terms of firmness, removal force, weight and volume of 100 berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar calcium spray was very effective in reducing percentages of berry decay, cracking, wrinkling and shatter under all irrigation levels.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
foliar spray with calciume0
Outcome
percentages of berries decay, cracking, wrinkled and berries shattere0
Direction
reducinge0
Qualifier
under all irrigation levelse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar spray with calcium as well as silicon was very effective in reducing percentages of berries decay, cracking, wrinkled and berries shatter under all irrigation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon spray was very effective in reducing percentages of berry decay, cracking, wrinkling and shatter under all irrigation levels.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
silicone0
Outcome
percentages of berries decay, cracking, wrinkled and berries shattere0
Direction
reducinge0
Qualifier
under all irrigation levelse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar spray with calcium as well as silicon was very effective in reducing percentages of berries decay, cracking, wrinkled and berries shatter under all irrigation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 50% depletion of available soil water increased berry SSC% and SSC/acid ratio.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
irrigation at 50% depleted from soil available water levele0
Outcome
berry SSC% and SSC/acid ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“the irrigation at 50% depleted from soil available water level increased berry SSC% and SSC/acid ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 50% depletion of available soil water slightly decreased berry acidity%.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
irrigation at 50% depleted from soil available water levele0
Outcome
berry acidity%e0
Direction
slightly decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“the irrigation at 50% depleted from soil available water level increased berry SSC% and SSC/acid ratio and slightly decreased berry acidity%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The productivity of irrigation water was enhanced in vines irrigated at 50% depletion of available soil water.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Treatment
irrigated at 50% depleted from soil available watere0
Outcome
productivity of irrigation watere0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“the productivity of irrigation water was enhanced in vines irrigated at 50% depleted from soil available water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1707–1817 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend irrigation at 50% depletion, which can reduce irrigation water by about 50% without loss in total yield while maintaining cluster and berry quality.

Taxon
GRAPEVINESt0
Outcome
reduce water irrigation by about 50% without losses in total yielde0
Value
about 50%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“GRAPEVINES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“recommend it can reduce water irrigation by about 50% without losses in total yield with maintaining cluster and berry quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1819–1945 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

silicon atom · disease · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · VitisPositive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

32 papers: 26 positive, 6 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

application · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

46 papers: 37 positive, 9 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · VitisPositive and negative results

47 papers: 40 positive, 7 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

51 papers: 46 positive, 5 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

application · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

56 papers: 50 positive, 6 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.