Paper · 2021 · Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences

Protective effect of jasmonic acid and potassium against cadmium stress in peas (Pisum sativum L.)

Tahira Abbas; Rong Fan; Sajjad Hussain; et al.

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
37
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

A combination of mineral nutrients and plant growth regulators should be assessed to improve crop performance under various abiotic stresses. There is a need to include plant growth regulators in fertilization regime of various crops along with essential mineral nutrients, especially when they are irrigated with polluted water with higher levels of heavy metals. The performance of pea was evaluated under cadmium (Cd) stress coupled with potassium (K) and jasmonic acid (JA) supplementation. The Cd stress (50 μM) was applied to soil (sandy loam) grown pea plants as basal dose after a month of sowing. The control and stressed plants were then supplemented with K (5 M), JA (0.5 mM) and their collective application along with control as distilled water. Cd stress showed a marked reduction in growth pattern, however, the collective supplementation sufficiently improved the growth pattern of stressed peas plants as evidenced by improvement in shoot length (cm), root length (cm), number of leaves per plant, leaf area (cm2), plant fresh and dry weight (gm). Potassium application under Cd stress significantly enhanced internodal distance (cm) while the number of seeds per pod and relative water contents remained nonsignificant. The applied treatment (JA + K) under Cd stress prominently improved enzymatic activities, which were measured as nitrate reductase activity (NRA), nitrite reductase activity (NiRA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT). Cd stress impacted the biochemical profile by enhancing antioxidant capacity (AC), antioxidant activity (AA), total phenols (TP), while reducing total soluble protein (TSP), chlorophyll ‘a’, chlorophyll ‘b’ and carotenoids. The combined application of JA and K under Cd stress enhanced AC, AA, TP, Chl a and b, TSP and carotenoids. The results indicate that foliar application of JA and K efficiently negated the harmful effects of Cd stress on peas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium stress reduced pea growth.

Taxon
peas (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
Cd stresse0
Outcome
growth patterne0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cd stress showed a marked reduction in growth pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined jasmonic acid and potassium improved stressed pea shoot length, root length, and leaves per plant.

Taxon
peas (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
collective supplementatione0
Outcome
shoot length (cm), root length (cm), number of leaves per plante0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“collective supplementation sufficiently improved the growth pattern of stressed peas plants as evidenced by improvement in shoot length (cm), root length (cm), number of leaves per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined supplementation improved stressed pea leaf area and fresh and dry weight.

Taxon
peas (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
collective supplementatione0
Outcome
leaf area (cm2), plant fresh and dry weight (gm)e0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“collective supplementation sufficiently improved the growth pattern of stressed peas plants as evidenced by improvement in shoot length (cm), root length (cm), number of leaves per plant, leaf area (cm2), plant fresh and dry weight (gm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium significantly increased internodal distance under cadmium stress.

Taxon
peas (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
Potassium application under Cd stresse0
Outcome
internodal distance (cm)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium application under Cd stress significantly enhanced internodal distance (cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium did not significantly change seeds per pod or relative water content under cadmium stress.

Taxon
peas (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
Potassium application under Cd stresse0
Outcome
number of seeds per pod and relative water contentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium application under Cd stress significantly enhanced internodal distance (cm) while the number of seeds per pod and relative water contents remained nonsignificant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined JA and K improved nitrate reductase, nitrite reductase, and superoxide dismutase activities under cadmium stress.

Taxon
peas (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
JA + Ke0
Outcome
nitrate reductase activity (NRA), nitrite reductase activity (NiRA), superoxide dismutase (SOD)e0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
under Cd stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The applied treatment (JA + K) under Cd stress prominently improved enzymatic activities, which were measured as nitrate reductase activity (NRA), nitrite reductase activity (NiRA), superoxide dismutase (SOD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined JA and K improved peroxidase and catalase activities under cadmium stress.

Taxon
peas (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
JA + Ke0
Outcome
peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
under Cd stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The applied treatment (JA + K) under Cd stress prominently improved enzymatic activities, which were measured as nitrate reductase activity (NRA), nitrite reductase activity (NiRA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1483 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium stress increased antioxidant capacity, antioxidant activity, and total phenols.

Taxon
peas (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
Cd stresse0
Outcome
antioxidant capacity (AC), antioxidant activity (AA), total phenols (TP)e0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cd stress impacted the biochemical profile by enhancing antioxidant capacity (AC), antioxidant activity (AA), total phenols (TP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1613 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium stress reduced total soluble protein, chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b.

Taxon
peas (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
Cd stresse1
Outcome
total soluble protein (TSP), chlorophyll ‘a’, chlorophyll ‘b’e0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while reducing total soluble protein (TSP), chlorophyll ‘a’, chlorophyll ‘b’ and carotenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1707 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cd stress impacted the biochemical profile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1527 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium stress reduced carotenoids.

Taxon
peas (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
Cd stresse1
Outcome
carotenoidse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while reducing total soluble protein (TSP), chlorophyll ‘a’, chlorophyll ‘b’ and carotenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1707 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cd stress impacted the biochemical profile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1527 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined JA and K increased antioxidant capacity, antioxidant activity, and total phenols under cadmium stress.

Taxon
peas (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
combined application of JA and K under Cd stresse0
Outcome
AC, AA, TPe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of JA and K under Cd stress enhanced AC, AA, TP, Chl a and b, TSP and carotenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1815 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined JA and K increased chlorophyll a and b, soluble protein, and carotenoids under cadmium stress.

Taxon
peas (Pisum sativum L.)Lathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
combined application of JA and K under Cd stresse0
Outcome
Chl a and b, TSP and carotenoidse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of JA and K under Cd stress enhanced AC, AA, TP, Chl a and b, TSP and carotenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1815 · show in text ↑
t0

“peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–98 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · physiology: osmolytes · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cadmium atom · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

30 papers: 4 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

cadmium atom · quality: phytochemicals · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

cadmium atom · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

jasmonic acid · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cadmium atom · physiology: pigments · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

8 papers: 0 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

heavy metal · quality: phytochemicals · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

potassium · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.