Paper · 2008 · ビブリア 天理図書館報

翻刻『花月日記--松平定信自筆』(18)文政二年一月〜九月

偉久子 岡嶌; 陸宏 山根

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Excessive fertilization is associated with nutrient loss, soil compaction, and weak plant resistance. Straw returning can increase soil fertility with a consequent reduction in fertilizer, but the effects of fertilizer reduction coupled with straw returning on crop endophytic microbes and crop disease are poorly understood. Therefore, using metagenomic sequencing methods we investigated the responses of soil fertility, diversity, the function of root endophytic bacteria, and the occurrence of wheat crown rot due to the application of fertilizer (no, moderate and excessive fertilizer) coupled with or without straw returning after 7 years of treatments. The results showed that, after excessive fertilization, the wheat crown rot became severe, registering a disease index of 23. Compared with excessive fertilization, moderate fertilization coupled with straw returning significantly reduced the incidence of wheat crown rot, the disease index was reduced by 38.50%, and the richness and diversity of endophytic bacteria were increased by 61.20 and 11.93%, respectively, but the soil fertility was not significantly affected. In addition, moderate fertilization coupled with straw returning changed the community structure of endophytic bacteria and increased the relative abundance of carbohydrate metabolism and nitrogen fixation-related genes by 4.72 and 9.32%, respectively. Our results indicated that fertilizer reduction coupled with straw returning reduced the occurrence of wheat crown rot, increased the diversity of endophytic bacteria, and changed the community structure and function of endophytic bacteria, which will provide a better understanding of the interaction of fertilization coupled with straw returning, endophytic bacteria and wheat crown rot.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessive fertilization was associated with severe wheat crown rot, with a disease index of 23.

Treatment
excessive fertilizatione0
Outcome
wheat crown rote0
Direction
became severee0
Value
23e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after excessive fertilization, the wheat crown rot became severe, registering a disease index of 23”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate fertilization with straw returning reduced wheat crown rot incidence compared with excessive fertilization.

Treatment
moderate fertilization coupled with straw returninge0
Outcome
incidence of wheat crown rote0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
excessive fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with excessive fertilization, moderate fertilization coupled with straw returning significantly reduced the incidence of wheat crown rot, the disease index was reduced by 38.50%, and the richness and diversity of endophytic bacteria were increased by 61.20 and 11.93%, respectively, but the soil fertility was not significantly affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate fertilization with straw returning reduced the wheat crown rot disease index by 38.50% compared with excessive fertilization.

Treatment
moderate fertilization coupled with straw returninge0
Outcome
disease indexe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
38.50%e0
Comparator
excessive fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with excessive fertilization, moderate fertilization coupled with straw returning significantly reduced the incidence of wheat crown rot, the disease index was reduced by 38.50%, and the richness and diversity of endophytic bacteria were increased by 61.20 and 11.93%, respectively, but the soil fertility was not significantly affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate fertilization with straw returning increased wheat root endophytic bacterial richness by 61.20% compared with excessive fertilization.

Treatment
moderate fertilization coupled with straw returninge0
Interactor
endophytic bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
richnesse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
61.20e0
Comparator
excessive fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with excessive fertilization, moderate fertilization coupled with straw returning significantly reduced the incidence of wheat crown rot, the disease index was reduced by 38.50%, and the richness and diversity of endophytic bacteria were increased by 61.20 and 11.93%, respectively, but the soil fertility was not significantly affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate fertilization with straw returning increased wheat root endophytic bacterial diversity by 11.93% compared with excessive fertilization.

Treatment
moderate fertilization coupled with straw returninge0
Interactor
endophytic bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
diversity of endophytic bacteriae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.93%e0
Comparator
excessive fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with excessive fertilization, moderate fertilization coupled with straw returning significantly reduced the incidence of wheat crown rot, the disease index was reduced by 38.50%, and the richness and diversity of endophytic bacteria were increased by 61.20 and 11.93%, respectively, but the soil fertility was not significantly affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate fertilization with straw returning did not significantly affect soil fertility compared with excessive fertilization.

Treatment
moderate fertilization coupled with straw returninge0
Outcome
soil fertilitye0
Comparator
excessive fertilizatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with excessive fertilization, moderate fertilization coupled with straw returning significantly reduced the incidence of wheat crown rot, the disease index was reduced by 38.50%, and the richness and diversity of endophytic bacteria were increased by 61.20 and 11.93%, respectively, but the soil fertility was not significantly affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate fertilization with straw returning changed wheat root endophytic bacterial community structure.

Treatment
moderate fertilization coupled with straw returninge0
Interactor
endophytic bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
community structure of endophytic bacteriae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate fertilization coupled with straw returning changed the community structure of endophytic bacteria and increased the relative abundance of carbohydrate metabolism and nitrogen fixation-related genes by 4.72 and 9.32%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1384 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that, after excessive fertilization, the wheat crown rot became severe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate fertilization with straw returning increased the relative abundance of carbohydrate metabolism genes in wheat root endophytic bacteria by 4.72%.

Treatment
moderate fertilization coupled with straw returninge0
Interactor
endophytic bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
relative abundance of carbohydrate metabolisme0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.72e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate fertilization coupled with straw returning changed the community structure of endophytic bacteria and increased the relative abundance of carbohydrate metabolism and nitrogen fixation-related genes by 4.72 and 9.32%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1384 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that, after excessive fertilization, the wheat crown rot became severe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate fertilization with straw returning increased the relative abundance of nitrogen fixation-related genes in wheat root endophytic bacteria by 9.32%.

Treatment
moderate fertilization coupled with straw returninge0
Interactor
endophytic bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen fixation-related genese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.32%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate fertilization coupled with straw returning changed the community structure of endophytic bacteria and increased the relative abundance of carbohydrate metabolism and nitrogen fixation-related genes by 4.72 and 9.32%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1384 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that, after excessive fertilization, the wheat crown rot became severe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–749 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

82 papers: 77 positive, 5 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

fertilization · ecology: diversity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

organic · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

organic · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 11 positive, 9 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

organic · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

organic · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 53 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

fertilization · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

84 papers: 63 positive, 21 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.