Paper · 2019 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Effect of Different Straw Return Modes on Soil Bacterial Community, Enzyme Activities and Organic Carbon Fractions

Huili Zhao; Yuhan Jiang; Peng Ning; et al.

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
51
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Core Ideas Straw returned twice each year (WC‐MC and WH‐MC) significantly enhanced SOC and DOC. Return of both wheat and maize chopped straw had highest β‐1,4‐xylosidase, invertase, and enhanced Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria . Retention of high wheat stubble and return of chopped straw had highest β‐1,4‐glucosidase, cellobiohydrolase, and enhanced Acidobacteria and Planctomycetes . Amount and complexity of straw added led to differences in C, enzyme activity, and microbial composition. High wheat stubble and crushed straw improved yields and bacterial richness, but had less C sequestration. Little is known about the responses of organic carbon fractions, enzymes activity, and soil bacterial communities and diversity to different straw return modes in intensive maize‐wheat double‐cropping systems. An 8‐yr field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of different straw return modes. Four treatments were compared: (i) return of both wheat and maize chopped straw (WC‐MC); (ii) retention of high wheat stubble and return of chopped maize straw (WH‐MC); (iii) retention of high wheat stubble and no return of maize straw (WH‐MN); and (iv) no return of straw of both wheat and maize (WN‐MN). Soil organic carbon, dissolved organic carbon, and particulate organic carbon content increased significantly in the WC‐MC and WH‐MC. Beta‐1‐4‐xylosidase and invertase were higher in the WC‐MC treatment than in WH‐MC, while the highest β‐1,4‐glucosidase activities were observed in WH‐MC. However, the activity of polyphenol oxidase was low in all three straw return treatments. Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria dominated in WC‐MC, while the Acidobacteria and Planctomycetes phyla dominated WH‐MC. The two high wheat stubble retention modes caused significant increases in bacterial richness. Redundancy analysis showed that C input amount and organic carbon content were the most influential factors determining bacterial community structure. The observed effects were due to straw amount and the complex composition of WH‐MC added during the wheat growing season compared to WC‐MC. In conclusion, the straw return mode that employs high wheat stubble retention and chopped maize straw return is sufficient to maintain organic carbon levels and improve the soil microenvironment

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice yearly straw return enhanced soil organic and dissolved organic carbon.

Treatment
Straw returned twice each year (WC‐MC and WH‐MC)e0
Outcome
SOC and DOCe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Straw returned twice each year (WC‐MC and WH‐MC) significantly enhanced SOC and DOC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–94 · show in text ↑
t0

“intensive maize‐wheat double‐cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High wheat stubble and crushed straw improved yields.

Treatment
High wheat stubble and crushed strawe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High wheat stubble and crushed straw improved yields and bacterial richness, but had less C sequestration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

WC-MC and WH-MC increased soil organic, dissolved and particulate carbon.

Treatment
WC‐MC and WH‐MCe0
Outcome
Soil organic carbon, dissolved organic carbon, and particulate organic carbon contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil organic carbon, dissolved organic carbon, and particulate organic carbon content increased significantly in the WC‐MC and WH‐MC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“intensive maize‐wheat double‐cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WC-MC had higher xylosidase and invertase than WH-MC.

Treatment
WC‐MCe0
Outcome
Beta‐1‐4‐xylosidase and invertasee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
WH‐MCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beta‐1‐4‐xylosidase and invertase were higher in the WC‐MC treatment than in WH‐MC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“intensive maize‐wheat double‐cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WH-MC had the highest glucosidase activity.

Treatment
WH‐MCe0
Outcome
β‐1,4‐glucosidase activitiese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest β‐1,4‐glucosidase activities were observed in WH‐MC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“intensive maize‐wheat double‐cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–820 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyphenol oxidase activity was low under all three straw return treatments.

Treatment
all three straw return treatmentse0
Outcome
activity of polyphenol oxidasee0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the activity of polyphenol oxidase was low in all three straw return treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1601 · show in text ↑
t0

“intensive maize‐wheat double‐cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–820 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria dominated WC-MC.

Treatment
WC‐MCe0
Outcome
Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria dominatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria dominated in WC‐MC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1665 · show in text ↑
t0

“intensive maize‐wheat double‐cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–820 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acidobacteria and Planctomycetes dominated WH-MC.

Treatment
WH‐MCe0
Outcome
Acidobacteria and Planctomycetes phyla dominatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Acidobacteria and Planctomycetes phyla dominated WH‐MC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1731 · show in text ↑
t0

“intensive maize‐wheat double‐cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High-stubble modes increased bacterial richness.

Treatment
two high wheat stubble retention modese0
Outcome
bacterial richnesse0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two high wheat stubble retention modes caused significant increases in bacterial richness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1733–1826 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon input and organic carbon most influenced bacterial community structure.

Compound
organic carbone0
Outcome
bacterial community structuree0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“C input amount and organic carbon content were the most influential factors determining bacterial community structure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1860–1977 · show in text ↑
t0

“intensive maize‐wheat double‐cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–820 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

High wheat stubble with chopped maize straw maintained organic carbon and improved the soil microenvironment.

Treatment
high wheat stubble retention and chopped maize straw returne0
Outcome
maintain organic carbon levels and improve the soil microenvironmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the straw return mode that employs high wheat stubble retention and chopped maize straw return is sufficient to maintain organic carbon levels and improve the soil microenvironment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2134–2314 · show in text ↑

organic · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 53 positive, 4 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.