Paper · 2021 · Horticulturae

In Vitro and In Vivo Antifungal Activities of Nine Commercial Essential Oils against Brown Rot in Apples

Assia El Khetabi; Said Ezrari; Lahsen El Ghadraoui; et al.

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

After harvest, numerous plant pathogenic fungi can infect fresh fruits during transit and storage. Although synthetic fungicides are often used to manage postharvest fruit diseases, their application may lead to problems such as the development of fungicide resistance and residues on fruits. In the present study, the antifungal potential of nine commercial essential oils (EOs) extracted from Eucalyptus radiata ssp. radiata, Mentha pulegium, Rosmarinus officinalis, Origanum compactum, Lavandula angustifolia, Syzygium aromaticum, Thymus vulgaris, Citrus aurantium, and Citrus sinensis were tested against the apple brown rot fungi Monilinia laxa and Monilinia fructigena at different concentrations in vitro (against mycelial growth and spore germination) and in vivo (on detached apple fruit and in semi-commercial postharvest conditions). In addition, fruit quality parameters were evaluated and the composition of the EOs was characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. In vitro results showed significant antifungal activity of all tested EOs on both fungal species. EOs from S. aromaticum were the most effective, whereby inhibition percentages ranged from 64.0 to 94.7% against M. laxa and from 63.9 to 94.4% against M. fructigena for the concentrations 12.5 and 100 µL/mL, respectively, with an EC50 of 6.74 µL/mL for M. laxa and 10.1 µL/mL for M. fructigena. The higher concentrations tested of S. aromaticum, T. vulgaris, C. aurantium, and C. sinensis EOs significantly reduced spore germination, brown rot incidence, and lesion diameter. Evaluation of the treatments during storage for 20 days at 4 °C on apple fruit quality parameters demonstrated the preservation of the fruit quality characteristics studied (weight loss, total soluble solids, titratable acidity, firmness, and maturity index). FT-IR spectra obtained from all tested EO samples presented characteristic peaks and a high diversity of functional groups such as O–H groups, C–H bonds, and C–C stretching. The EOs examined here may have the potential for controlling postharvest fungal diseases of fruit such as brown rot.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested essential oils showed significant antifungal activity against both Monilinia species in vitro.

Treatment
Nine Commercial Essential Oilst0
Outcome
antifungal activitye1
Direction
significante1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nine Commercial Essential Oils against Brown Rot in Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“In vitro results showed significant antifungal activity of all tested EOs on both fungal species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1095 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential oil from S. aromaticum gave 64.0 to 94.7% inhibition against M. laxa, ranging from 64.0 to 94.7% and ranking as the most effective.

Treatment
EOs from S. aromaticume2
Interactor
M. laxaMonilinia laxae2pathogen
Outcome
inhibition percentagese2
Direction
ranged frome2
Value
64.0 to 94.7%e2
Qualifier
the most effectivee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia laxa
Monilinia laxa · InteractorArthuc01 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nine Commercial Essential Oils against Brown Rot in Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–104 · show in text ↑
e2

“EOs from S. aromaticum were the most effective, whereby inhibition percentages ranged from 64.0 to 94.7% against M. laxa and from 63.9 to 94.4% against M. fructigena”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential oil from S. aromaticum gave 63.9 to 94.4% inhibition against M. fructigena, ranking as the most effective.

Treatment
EOs from S. aromaticume2
Interactor
M. fructigenaMonilinia fructigenae2pathogen
Outcome
inhibition percentagese2
Direction
ranged frome2
Value
63.9 to 94.4%e2
Qualifier
the most effectivee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructigena
Monilinia fructigena · InteractorSanja565658 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nine Commercial Essential Oils against Brown Rot in Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–104 · show in text ↑
e2

“EOs from S. aromaticum were the most effective, whereby inhibition percentages ranged from 64.0 to 94.7% against M. laxa and from 63.9 to 94.4% against M. fructigena”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1262 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential oil from S. aromaticum had an EC50 of 6.74 µL/mL against M. laxa.

Treatment
EOs from S. aromaticume2
Interactor
M. laxaMonilinia laxae3pathogen
Outcome
EC50e3
Value
6.74 µL/mLe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia laxa
Monilinia laxa · InteractorArthuc01 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nine Commercial Essential Oils against Brown Rot in Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–104 · show in text ↑
e2

“EOs from S. aromaticum were the most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1143 · show in text ↑
e3

“with an EC50 of 6.74 µL/mL for M. laxa and 10.1 µL/mL for M. fructigena”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1391 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential oil from S. aromaticum had an EC50 of 10.1 µL/mL against M. fructigena.

Treatment
EOs from S. aromaticume2
Interactor
M. fructigenaMonilinia fructigenae3pathogen
Outcome
EC50e3
Value
10.1 µL/mLe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Monilinia fructigena
Monilinia fructigena · InteractorSanja565658 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nine Commercial Essential Oils against Brown Rot in Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–104 · show in text ↑
e2

“EOs from S. aromaticum were the most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1143 · show in text ↑
e3

“with an EC50 of 6.74 µL/mL for M. laxa and 10.1 µL/mL for M. fructigena”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher concentrations of S. aromaticum essential oil significantly reduced spore germination, brown rot incidence and lesion diameter.

Treatment
S. aromaticume4
Outcome
spore germination, brown rot incidence, and lesion diametere4
Direction
reducede4
Qualifier
higher concentrations testede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nine Commercial Essential Oils against Brown Rot in Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–104 · show in text ↑
e4

“The higher concentrations tested of S. aromaticum, T. vulgaris, C. aurantium, and C. sinensis EOs significantly reduced spore germination, brown rot incidence, and lesion diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher concentrations of T. vulgaris essential oil significantly reduced spore germination, brown rot incidence and lesion diameter.

Treatment
T. vulgarise4
Outcome
spore germination, brown rot incidence, and lesion diametere4
Direction
reducede4
Qualifier
higher concentrations testede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nine Commercial Essential Oils against Brown Rot in Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–104 · show in text ↑
e4

“The higher concentrations tested of S. aromaticum, T. vulgaris, C. aurantium, and C. sinensis EOs significantly reduced spore germination, brown rot incidence, and lesion diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher concentrations of C. aurantium essential oil significantly reduced spore germination, brown rot incidence and lesion diameter.

Treatment
C. aurantiume4
Outcome
spore germination, brown rot incidence, and lesion diametere4
Direction
reducede4
Qualifier
higher concentrations testede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nine Commercial Essential Oils against Brown Rot in Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–104 · show in text ↑
e4

“The higher concentrations tested of S. aromaticum, T. vulgaris, C. aurantium, and C. sinensis EOs significantly reduced spore germination, brown rot incidence, and lesion diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher concentrations of C. sinensis essential oil significantly reduced spore germination, brown rot incidence and lesion diameter.

Treatment
C. sinensise4
Outcome
spore germination, brown rot incidence, and lesion diametere4
Direction
reducede4
Qualifier
higher concentrations testede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nine Commercial Essential Oils against Brown Rot in Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–104 · show in text ↑
e4

“The higher concentrations tested of S. aromaticum, T. vulgaris, C. aurantium, and C. sinensis EOs significantly reduced spore germination, brown rot incidence, and lesion diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1572 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage for 20 days at 4 °C preserved the apple fruit quality characteristics studied.

Outcome
fruit quality characteristicse5
Qualifier
storage for 20 days at 4 °Ce5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nine Commercial Essential Oils against Brown Rot in Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–104 · show in text ↑
e5

“Evaluation of the treatments during storage for 20 days at 4 °C on apple fruit quality parameters demonstrated the preservation of the fruit quality characteristics studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1746 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FT-IR spectra of all tested essential oils showed a high diversity of functional groups.

Outcome
high diversity of functional groupse6
Qualifier
O–H groups, C–H bonds, and C–C stretchinge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nine Commercial Essential Oils against Brown Rot in Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–104 · show in text ↑
e6

“FT-IR spectra obtained from all tested EO samples presented characteristic peaks and a high diversity of functional groups such as O–H groups, C–H bonds, and C–C stretching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–2006 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest these essential oils may help control postharvest fungal diseases of apple fruit such as brown rot.

Outcome
controlling postharvest fungal diseases of fruite7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Nine Commercial Essential Oils against Brown Rot in Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–104 · show in text ↑
e7

“The EOs examined here may have the potential for controlling postharvest fungal diseases of fruit such as brown rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2008–2123 · show in text ↑

Syzygium aromaticum · Monilinia laxa · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Syzygium aromaticum · Monilinia fructigena · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Syzygium aromaticum · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Thymus vulgaris · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 36 positive, 3 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

botanical · Monilinia laxa · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Monilinia fructigena · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.