Paper · 2021 · NVEO - NATURAL VOLATILES & ESSENTIAL OILS Journal | NVEO

In-Vivo Antagonistic Potential Of Natural Extract And Rhizobacterial Isolates Against Root Rot Of Chili Incited By Pythium Aphanidermatum

M. Ahmad; Muhammad Nasir Subhani; Muhammad Ali; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In vivo experiments evaluated the effect of two rhizobacterial isolates and Ganoderma lucidum extract were tested against Pythium aphanidermatum.Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas fluorescence and G. lucidum extract were used as biocontrol agents under field conditions (Pots) to control Pythium aphanidermatum and growth promotion of chili plant. P. fluorescence showed more growth promotion including the shoot and root length, leaf size, dry root and shoot weight, fresh root and shoot length of chili, and also inhibit the infection of P. aphanidermatum. B. subtilis also inhibit the P. aphanidermatum, and showed more growth promotion but less than P. fluorescence. The growth promotion of chili and P. aphanidermatum inhibition ability of G. lucidum extract under field conditions (pots) was not so much satisfactory.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescence promoted chili shoot and root growth, leaf size, and biomass.

Taxon
chilie0
Treatment
P. fluorescencee0
Interactor
P. fluorescencee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
shoot and root length, leaf size, dry root and shoot weighte0
Direction
more growth promotione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“P. fluorescence showed more growth promotion including the shoot and root length, leaf size, dry root and shoot weight, fresh root and shoot length of chili”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescence inhibited Pythium infection.

Taxon
chilie0
Treatment
P. fluorescencee0
Interactor
P. aphanidermatumPythium aphanidermatume0pathogen
Second interactor
P. fluorescencee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
infection of P. aphanidermatume0
Direction
inhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“P. fluorescence showed more growth promotion including the shoot and root length, leaf size, dry root and shoot weight, fresh root and shoot length of chili, and also inhibit the infection of P. aphanidermatum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis inhibited Pythium.

Taxon
chilit0
Treatment
B. subtilise0
Interactor
P. aphanidermatumPythium aphanidermatume0pathogen
Second interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
P. aphanidermatume0
Direction
inhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis also inhibit the P. aphanidermatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chili”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis promoted chili growth less than Pseudomonas fluorescence.

Taxon
chilit0
Treatment
B. subtilise0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth promotione0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
P. fluorescencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis also inhibit the P. aphanidermatum, and showed more growth promotion but less than P. fluorescence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–666 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chili”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ganoderma extract had unsatisfactory chili growth promotion.

Taxon
chilie0
Treatment
G. lucidum extracte0
Interactor
G. lucidumGanoderma lucidume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth promotion of chilie0
Setting
field conditions (pots)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ganoderma lucidum
Ganoderma lucidum · InteractorEric Steinert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth promotion of chili and P. aphanidermatum inhibition ability of G. lucidum extract under field conditions (pots) was not so much satisfactory.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–819 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ganoderma extract had unsatisfactory Pythium inhibition.

Taxon
chilie0
Treatment
G. lucidum extracte0
Interactor
P. aphanidermatumPythium aphanidermatume0pathogen
Second interactor
G. lucidumGanoderma lucidume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
P. aphanidermatum inhibition abilitye0
Setting
field conditions (pots)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ganoderma lucidum
Ganoderma lucidum · Second interactorEric Steinert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth promotion of chili and P. aphanidermatum inhibition ability of G. lucidum extract under field conditions (pots) was not so much satisfactory.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–819 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

botanical · Pythium aphanidermatum · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 23 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.