Paper · 2009 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Biocontrol potential of cyanobacterial metabolites against damping off disease caused byPythium aphanidermatumin solanaceous vegetables

M. Manjunath; Radha Prasanna; Lata Nain; et al.

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
100
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An investigation was undertaken to explore the biocidal efficacy of fungicidal compound(s) produced by Calothrix elenkenii against damping-off disease in three vegetable crops-tomato, chilli and brinjal. Treatments included application of seeds soaked in water (control), culture filtrate and ethyl acetate extract of Calothrix elenkenii and Metalaxyl in potting mix inoculated with Pythium aphanidermatum in plastic pots. The observations taken after a period of four weeks revealed the superiority of seed treatment with ethyl acetate extracts, in terms of percent mortality and plant parameters. ANOVA revealed that the treatments, crops (tomato, chilli and brinjal) and their interactions exerted a significant influence on the parameters analyzed. Chilli recorded the highest percentage of survivors and responded best to the seed treatment with ethyl acetate extract of Calothrix elenkenii. Future work is being undertaken towards formulation of a biocontrol agent using Calothrix elenkenii and understanding the molecular basis for the biocontrol properties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calothrix ethyl acetate seed treatment was superior for mortality and plant parameters.

Taxon
tomato, chilli and brinjale1
Treatment
seed treatment with ethyl acetate extractse0
Interactor
Pythium aphanidermatumPythium aphanidermatume2pathogen
Outcome
percent mortality and plant parameterse0
Direction
superioritye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“superiority of seed treatment with ethyl acetate extracts, in terms of percent mortality and plant parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–597 · show in text ↑
e1

“three vegetable crops-tomato, chilli and brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–202 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pythium aphanidermatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–405 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment, crop and their interaction significantly influenced the analysed parameters.

Taxon
tomato, chilli and brinjale0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
parameters analyzede0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the treatments, crops (tomato, chilli and brinjal) and their interactions exerted a significant influence on the parameters analyzed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–751 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli had the highest survivor percentage.

Taxon
Chillie0
Outcome
percentage of survivorse0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“Chilli recorded the highest percentage of survivors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli responded best to Calothrix ethyl acetate seed treatment.

Taxon
Chillie0
Treatment
seed treatment with ethyl acetate extract of Calothrix elenkeniie0
Interactor
Calothrix elenkeniie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
responded beste0
Direction
responded beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Chilli recorded the highest percentage of survivors and responded best to the seed treatment with ethyl acetate extract of Calothrix elenkenii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–895 · show in text ↑

botanical · Pythium aphanidermatum · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

seed treatment · Pythium aphanidermatum · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Pythium aphanidermatum · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · Pythium aphanidermatum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

seed treatment · Pythium aphanidermatum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.